Non-Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Overview.

IF 0.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal Tumors Pub Date : 2020-07-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-20 DOI:10.1159/000507701
Melanie Tepus, Tung On Yau
{"title":"Non-Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Overview.","authors":"Melanie Tepus,&nbsp;Tung On Yau","doi":"10.1159/000507701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) follows a protracted stepwise progression, from benign adenomas to malignant adenocarcinomas. If detected early, 90% of deaths are preventable. However, CRC is asymptomatic in its early-stage and arises sporadically within the population. Therefore, CRC screening is a public health priority.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is gradually replacing guaiac faecal occult blood test and is now the most commonly used screening tool for CRC screening program globally. However, FIT is still limited by the haemoglobin degradation and the intermittent bleeding patterns, so that one in four CRC cases are still diagnosed in a late stage, leading to poor prognosis. A multi-target stool DNA test (Cologuard, a combination of <i>NDRG4</i> and <i>BMP3</i> DNA methylation, <i>KRAS</i> mutations, and haemoglobin) and a plasma <i>SEPT9</i> DNA methylation test (Epi proColon) are non-invasive tools also approved by the US FDA, but those screening approaches are not cost-effective, and the detection accuracies remain unsatisfactory. In addition to the approved tests, faecal-/blood-based microRNA and CRC-related gut microbiome screening markers are under development, with work ongoing to find the best combination of molecular biomarkers which maximise the screening sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Key message: </strong>Maximising the detection accuracy with a cost-effective approach for non-invasive CRC screening is urgently needed to further reduce the incidence of CRC and associated mortality rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"7 3","pages":"62-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000507701","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000507701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) follows a protracted stepwise progression, from benign adenomas to malignant adenocarcinomas. If detected early, 90% of deaths are preventable. However, CRC is asymptomatic in its early-stage and arises sporadically within the population. Therefore, CRC screening is a public health priority.

Summary: Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is gradually replacing guaiac faecal occult blood test and is now the most commonly used screening tool for CRC screening program globally. However, FIT is still limited by the haemoglobin degradation and the intermittent bleeding patterns, so that one in four CRC cases are still diagnosed in a late stage, leading to poor prognosis. A multi-target stool DNA test (Cologuard, a combination of NDRG4 and BMP3 DNA methylation, KRAS mutations, and haemoglobin) and a plasma SEPT9 DNA methylation test (Epi proColon) are non-invasive tools also approved by the US FDA, but those screening approaches are not cost-effective, and the detection accuracies remain unsatisfactory. In addition to the approved tests, faecal-/blood-based microRNA and CRC-related gut microbiome screening markers are under development, with work ongoing to find the best combination of molecular biomarkers which maximise the screening sensitivity and specificity.

Key message: Maximising the detection accuracy with a cost-effective approach for non-invasive CRC screening is urgently needed to further reduce the incidence of CRC and associated mortality rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非侵入性结直肠癌筛查综述
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)从良性腺瘤逐步发展为恶性腺癌。如果及早发现,90%的死亡是可以预防的。然而,结直肠癌在早期是无症状的,在人群中零星发生。因此,CRC筛查是一项公共卫生优先事项。摘要:粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)正逐渐取代愈创木粪便潜血试验,成为目前全球最常用的CRC筛查工具。然而,FIT仍然受到血红蛋白降解和间歇性出血模式的限制,因此四分之一的CRC病例仍然在晚期诊断,导致预后较差。多靶点粪便DNA检测(Cologuard, NDRG4和BMP3 DNA甲基化、KRAS突变和血红蛋白的组合)和血浆SEPT9 DNA甲基化检测(Epi proColon)也是美国FDA批准的非侵入性工具,但这些筛查方法不具有成本效益,检测准确性仍然令人不满意。除了已批准的测试外,基于粪便/血液的microRNA和crc相关的肠道微生物组筛选标记物正在开发中,正在进行的工作是寻找分子生物标记物的最佳组合,从而最大限度地提高筛选的敏感性和特异性。关键信息:为了进一步降低结直肠癌的发病率和相关死亡率,迫切需要以一种具有成本效益的方法最大化检测准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal Tumors
Gastrointestinal Tumors GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Novel Urinary Biomarkers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in a Predominantly African American Population: A Case-Control Study. Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers. Association between Serum Zinc Levels and Clinicopathological Characteristics in Patients with Gastric Cancer. Mixed Neuroendocrine and Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasm of Pancreas: What Do We Know, What Have We Learnt? Mast Cell Sarcoma of Small Intestine, Early Diagnosis, and Good Prognosis: An Extremely Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1