Who is in the revolving door? Policy and practice implications of recurrent reports to adult protective services.

IF 1.6 2区 心理学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.1080/08946566.2020.1852142
Julia M Rowan, Jeanine Yonashiro-Cho, Kathleen H Wilber, Zachary D Gassoumis
{"title":"Who is in the revolving door? Policy and practice implications of recurrent reports to adult protective services.","authors":"Julia M Rowan,&nbsp;Jeanine Yonashiro-Cho,&nbsp;Kathleen H Wilber,&nbsp;Zachary D Gassoumis","doi":"10.1080/08946566.2020.1852142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Repeat referral to adult protective services APS (recurrence) is a much-discussed topic among APS agencies as it may indicate ongoing harm, yet there is limited research examining prevalence or causes. This paper provides a foundational investigation of recurrence within a California APS county program. Drawing from thirty-three months of de-identified reports, we used logistic regression to examine the impact of intake report characteristics on repeat referral within one year after baseline case closure. One-fifth of the sample was recurrent (19.9%, n=987/4,958), with self-neglect being the most common type of report to recur (14.3%, n=307/2,141). Overall recurrence was predicted by female gender, older age, living alone, and multiple elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) types reported at baseline, and report placed by social service provider, friends, family, landlords, and victim self-reports. Reporters personally related to the victim and social service providers are potential partners in identifying ANE, and alternate intervention approaches may be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":46983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08946566.2020.1852142","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2020.1852142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Repeat referral to adult protective services APS (recurrence) is a much-discussed topic among APS agencies as it may indicate ongoing harm, yet there is limited research examining prevalence or causes. This paper provides a foundational investigation of recurrence within a California APS county program. Drawing from thirty-three months of de-identified reports, we used logistic regression to examine the impact of intake report characteristics on repeat referral within one year after baseline case closure. One-fifth of the sample was recurrent (19.9%, n=987/4,958), with self-neglect being the most common type of report to recur (14.3%, n=307/2,141). Overall recurrence was predicted by female gender, older age, living alone, and multiple elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) types reported at baseline, and report placed by social service provider, friends, family, landlords, and victim self-reports. Reporters personally related to the victim and social service providers are potential partners in identifying ANE, and alternate intervention approaches may be necessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁在旋转门里?定期报告对成人保护服务的政策和实践影响。
重复转介到成人保护服务APS(复发)是APS机构之间讨论较多的话题,因为它可能表明持续的危害,但对患病率或原因的研究有限。本文提供了加州APS县程序内复发的基础调查。从33个月的去识别报告中,我们使用逻辑回归来检查入院报告特征对基线病例结束后一年内重复转诊的影响。五分之一的样本复发(19.9%,n=987/ 4958),自我忽视是最常见的复发类型(14.3%,n=307/ 2141)。总体复发预测因素包括女性性别、年龄较大、独居、多重虐待、忽视和剥削(ANE)类型基线报告,以及社会服务提供者、朋友、家人、房东和受害者自我报告。与受害者有个人关系的记者和社会服务提供者是确定ANE的潜在合作伙伴,可能需要替代干预方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect is the peer-reviewed quarterly journal that explores the advances in research, policy and practice, and clinical and ethical issues surrounding the abuse and neglect of older people. This unique forum provides state-of-the-art research and practice that is both international and multidisciplinary in scope. The journal"s broad, comprehensive approach is only one of its strengths—it presents training issues, research findings, case studies, practice and policy issues, book and media reviews, commentary, and historical background on a wide range of topics. Readers get tools and techniques needed for better detecting and responding to actual or potential elder abuse and neglect.
期刊最新文献
Older adults who use drugs: an examination of policy and preparedness in nursing facilities. Transforming learning for adult protective services caseworker certification training: program evaluation of simulation training. Correction. Elder mistreatment and cognitive functioning among Chinese older adults in the U.S. Loneliness could lead to risk of fraud victimization for middle-aged and older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1