Full-Coverage Chiropractic in Medicare: A Proposal to Eliminate Inequities, Improve Outcomes, and Reduce Health Disparities Without Increasing Overall Program Costs

Q3 Health Professions Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.echu.2020.10.002
Robert A. Leach DC, MS
{"title":"Full-Coverage Chiropractic in Medicare: A Proposal to Eliminate Inequities, Improve Outcomes, and Reduce Health Disparities Without Increasing Overall Program Costs","authors":"Robert A. Leach DC, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2020.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this article is to discuss evidence that supports the resolution of inequities for Medicare beneficiaries who receive chiropractic care.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p><span><span>Medicare covers necessary examinations, imaging, exercise instruction, and treatments for beneficiaries with </span>back pain<span><span><span> when provided by medical doctors, osteopaths, and their associated support staff such as nurse practitioners, </span>physician assistants, </span>clinical nurse specialists, and physical therapists. However, if the same patient with back pain presents to a </span></span>chiropractor<span>, then the only service that is covered by Medicare is manipulation of the spine. Current evidence does not support this inequity in Medicare beneficiary service coverage. There is no evidence to show an increase in serious risks associated with chiropractic treatment of neck or back pain in Medicare beneficiaries. Chiropractors support national public health<span> goals and endorse safe, evidence-based practices. Chiropractic care for Medicare beneficiaries has been associated with enhanced clinical outcomes such as faster recovery, fewer back surgeries a year later, reduced opioid-associated disability, fewer traumatic injuries and falls, and slower declines in activities of daily living and disability over time. Further evidence points to lower costs, fewer medical physician visits for low back pain, less opioid-related expense, and less back-surgery expense with chiropractic utilization. Use is lower among vulnerable populations: seniors, lower income women, and black and Hispanic beneficiaries who may be most affected by current inequities associated with the limited coverage. In this era of evidence-based and patient-centered care, beneficiaries who receive chiropractic care are very satisfied with the care they receive.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The current evidence suggests a need for change in US policy toward chiropractic in Medicare and support for HR 3654. Ending inequities by providing patients full coverage for chiropractic services has the potential to enhance care outcomes and reduce health disparities without increasing program costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"27 ","pages":"Pages 29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2020.10.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349920300024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this article is to discuss evidence that supports the resolution of inequities for Medicare beneficiaries who receive chiropractic care.

Discussion

Medicare covers necessary examinations, imaging, exercise instruction, and treatments for beneficiaries with back pain when provided by medical doctors, osteopaths, and their associated support staff such as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, and physical therapists. However, if the same patient with back pain presents to a chiropractor, then the only service that is covered by Medicare is manipulation of the spine. Current evidence does not support this inequity in Medicare beneficiary service coverage. There is no evidence to show an increase in serious risks associated with chiropractic treatment of neck or back pain in Medicare beneficiaries. Chiropractors support national public health goals and endorse safe, evidence-based practices. Chiropractic care for Medicare beneficiaries has been associated with enhanced clinical outcomes such as faster recovery, fewer back surgeries a year later, reduced opioid-associated disability, fewer traumatic injuries and falls, and slower declines in activities of daily living and disability over time. Further evidence points to lower costs, fewer medical physician visits for low back pain, less opioid-related expense, and less back-surgery expense with chiropractic utilization. Use is lower among vulnerable populations: seniors, lower income women, and black and Hispanic beneficiaries who may be most affected by current inequities associated with the limited coverage. In this era of evidence-based and patient-centered care, beneficiaries who receive chiropractic care are very satisfied with the care they receive.

Conclusion

The current evidence suggests a need for change in US policy toward chiropractic in Medicare and support for HR 3654. Ending inequities by providing patients full coverage for chiropractic services has the potential to enhance care outcomes and reduce health disparities without increasing program costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医疗保险中全面覆盖脊椎治疗:在不增加总体项目成本的情况下消除不公平、改善结果和减少健康差距的建议
目的本文的目的是讨论证据,支持解决不公平的医疗保险受益人谁接受脊椎指压治疗。医疗保险涵盖了必要的检查、成像、运动指导和治疗,由医生、整骨治疗师及其相关的支持人员(如执业护士、医师助理、临床护士专家和物理治疗师)提供。然而,如果同一个背部疼痛的病人出现在脊椎指压治疗师面前,那么医疗保险所涵盖的唯一服务就是脊椎的操纵。目前的证据并不支持医疗保险受益人服务覆盖的这种不平等。没有证据表明,在医疗保险受益人中,脊椎指压治疗与颈部或背部疼痛的严重风险增加有关。脊医支持国家公共卫生目标,支持安全、循证的实践。医疗保险受益人的脊椎按摩治疗与增强的临床结果相关,例如更快的恢复,一年后更少的背部手术,减少阿片类药物相关的残疾,更少的创伤性损伤和跌倒,以及随着时间的推移,日常生活活动和残疾的下降速度更慢。进一步的证据表明,更低的成本,更少的下背痛医生就诊,更少的阿片类药物相关费用,更少的背部手术费用与脊椎指压疗法的使用。弱势群体的使用率较低:老年人、低收入妇女、黑人和西班牙裔受益人,他们可能受到目前与有限覆盖相关的不平等现象的影响最大。在这个以证据为基础和以病人为中心的护理时代,接受脊椎指压治疗的受益人对他们得到的护理非常满意。结论:目前的证据表明,美国有必要改变医疗保险对脊椎指压治疗的政策,并支持HR 3654。通过为患者提供脊椎指压治疗服务的全面覆盖来结束不公平现象,有可能在不增加项目成本的情况下提高护理效果和减少健康差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Masthead Table of Contents Ed Board Research Trends in Dry Needling for Neck Pain Treatment: A Bibliometric Analysis Library as a Therapeutic Landscape Promoting Health and Well-Being to Chiropractic Students: A Descriptive Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1