Clinician Perspectives on Ethics and COVID-19: Minding the Gap in Sexual and Reproductive Health.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1363/psrh.12156
Mary A Ott, Caitlin Bernard, Tracey A Wilkinson, Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds
{"title":"Clinician Perspectives on Ethics and COVID-19: Minding the Gap in Sexual and Reproductive Health.","authors":"Mary A Ott, Caitlin Bernard, Tracey A Wilkinson, Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds","doi":"10.1363/psrh.12156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, policies and practices enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic— such as social distancing, sheltering in place, shifting to telemedicine and limiting care to ‚essential‛ procedures—are widening gaps in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes and access to services. As obstetricians-gynecologists, pediatricians and adolescent medicine specialists who are frontline providers of SRH services, we are seeing firsthand the documented decreases in access to SRH education, abortion and contraceptives (particularly long-acting reversible contraceptives, or LARCs), and increases in reports of gender-based violence.1–4 These trends have disproportionately affected minoritized and marginalized groups, including adolescents, people of color, those living in poverty, immigrants and undocumented individuals, and those living in rural areas.5,6 In this viewpoint, we provide a clinician’s perspective on the gaps in services and outcomes between these and more privileged groups, and make recommendations to narrow these gaps, both now and in the future. In some cases, the gaps in access to SRH services have been an unintended effect of COVID-19–related policies. For example, access to SRH services at federally qualified health centers and community-based clinics has been limited because of budgetary constraints, A cc ep te d A rti cl e","PeriodicalId":47632,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":"52 3","pages":"145-149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1363/psrh.12156","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

In the United States, policies and practices enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic— such as social distancing, sheltering in place, shifting to telemedicine and limiting care to ‚essential‛ procedures—are widening gaps in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes and access to services. As obstetricians-gynecologists, pediatricians and adolescent medicine specialists who are frontline providers of SRH services, we are seeing firsthand the documented decreases in access to SRH education, abortion and contraceptives (particularly long-acting reversible contraceptives, or LARCs), and increases in reports of gender-based violence.1–4 These trends have disproportionately affected minoritized and marginalized groups, including adolescents, people of color, those living in poverty, immigrants and undocumented individuals, and those living in rural areas.5,6 In this viewpoint, we provide a clinician’s perspective on the gaps in services and outcomes between these and more privileged groups, and make recommendations to narrow these gaps, both now and in the future. In some cases, the gaps in access to SRH services have been an unintended effect of COVID-19–related policies. For example, access to SRH services at federally qualified health centers and community-based clinics has been limited because of budgetary constraints, A cc ep te d A rti cl e
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医生对伦理和COVID-19的看法:注意性健康和生殖健康的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health provides the latest peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other developed countries. For more than four decades, Perspectives has offered unique insights into how reproductive health issues relate to one another; how they are affected by policies and programs; and their implications for individuals and societies. Published four times a year, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health includes original research, special reports and commentaries on the latest developments in the field of sexual and reproductive health, as well as staff-written summaries of recent findings in the field.
期刊最新文献
Sexual choking/strangulation and its association with condom and contraceptive use: Findings from a survey of students at a university in the Midwestern United States. Understanding abortion legality and trimester of abortion care in Ohio, West Virginia and Kentucky, three abortion‐restrictive states Abortion assistance fund staff and volunteers as patient navigators following an abortion ban in Texas. Abortion-related crowdfunding post-Dobbs. Medicaid's role in alleviating some of the financial burden of abortion: Findings from the 2021-2022 Abortion Patient Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1