Lateral entorhinal cortex lesions impair both egocentric and allocentric object-place associations.

Brain and neuroscience advances Pub Date : 2020-07-14 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2398212820939463
Maneesh V Kuruvilla, David I G Wilson, James A Ainge
{"title":"Lateral entorhinal cortex lesions impair both egocentric and allocentric object-place associations.","authors":"Maneesh V Kuruvilla,&nbsp;David I G Wilson,&nbsp;James A Ainge","doi":"10.1177/2398212820939463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During navigation, landmark processing is critical either for generating an allocentric-based cognitive map or in facilitating egocentric-based strategies. Increasing evidence from manipulation and single-unit recording studies has highlighted the role of the entorhinal cortex in processing landmarks. In particular, the lateral (LEC) and medial (MEC) sub-regions of the entorhinal cortex have been shown to attend to proximal and distal landmarks, respectively. Recent studies have identified a further dissociation in cue processing between the LEC and MEC based on spatial frames of reference. Neurons in the LEC preferentially encode egocentric cues while those in the MEC encode allocentric cues. In this study, we assessed the impact of disrupting the LEC on landmark-based spatial memory in both egocentric and allocentric reference frames. Animals that received excitotoxic lesions of the LEC were significantly impaired, relative to controls, on both egocentric and allocentric versions of an object-place association task. Notably, LEC lesioned animals performed at chance on the egocentric version but above chance on the allocentric version. There was no significant difference in performance between the two groups on an object recognition and spatial T-maze task. Taken together, these results indicate that the LEC plays a role in feature integration more broadly and in specifically processing spatial information within an egocentric reference frame.</p>","PeriodicalId":72444,"journal":{"name":"Brain and neuroscience advances","volume":"4 ","pages":"2398212820939463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2398212820939463","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and neuroscience advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2398212820939463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

During navigation, landmark processing is critical either for generating an allocentric-based cognitive map or in facilitating egocentric-based strategies. Increasing evidence from manipulation and single-unit recording studies has highlighted the role of the entorhinal cortex in processing landmarks. In particular, the lateral (LEC) and medial (MEC) sub-regions of the entorhinal cortex have been shown to attend to proximal and distal landmarks, respectively. Recent studies have identified a further dissociation in cue processing between the LEC and MEC based on spatial frames of reference. Neurons in the LEC preferentially encode egocentric cues while those in the MEC encode allocentric cues. In this study, we assessed the impact of disrupting the LEC on landmark-based spatial memory in both egocentric and allocentric reference frames. Animals that received excitotoxic lesions of the LEC were significantly impaired, relative to controls, on both egocentric and allocentric versions of an object-place association task. Notably, LEC lesioned animals performed at chance on the egocentric version but above chance on the allocentric version. There was no significant difference in performance between the two groups on an object recognition and spatial T-maze task. Taken together, these results indicate that the LEC plays a role in feature integration more broadly and in specifically processing spatial information within an egocentric reference frame.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外侧内嗅皮层病变损害了自我中心和异中心的客体-地点联系。
在导航过程中,地标处理对于生成基于非中心的认知地图或促进基于自我中心的策略至关重要。越来越多来自操作和单单元记录研究的证据强调了内嗅皮层在处理地标中的作用。特别是,内嗅皮层的外侧(LEC)和内侧(MEC)亚区已被证明分别参与近端和远端地标。最近的研究发现,在空间参考框架的基础上,LEC和MEC之间的线索加工进一步分离。LEC的神经元优先编码自我中心信号,而MEC的神经元优先编码异中心信号。在本研究中,我们评估了在自我中心和非中心参考框架下,破坏LEC对基于地标的空间记忆的影响。与对照组相比,接受LEC兴奋毒性损伤的动物在自我中心和异中心的物体-地点关联任务中都明显受损。值得注意的是,LEC损伤的动物在自我中心版本上的表现是偶然的,但在非中心版本上的表现是偶然的。两组在物体识别和空间t型迷宫任务上的表现无显著差异。综上所述,这些结果表明LEC在特征整合中发挥了更广泛的作用,特别是在以自我为中心的参考框架内处理空间信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of the gastric physiology of disgust: Proto-nausea as an under-explored facet of the gut-brain axis. From neurophobia to neurophilia: Fostering confidence and passion for neurology in medical students. Are all neuroscience degrees the same? A comparison of undergraduate neuroscience degrees across the United Kingdom. Centralising a loss of consciousness to the central medial thalamus. Genetically modified animals as models of neurodevelopmental conditions: A review of systematic review reporting quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1