Robot-mediated therapy to reduce worrying in persons with visual and intellectual disabilities.

Evelien van Wingerden, Emilia Barakova, Tino Lourens, Paula S Sterkenburg
{"title":"Robot-mediated therapy to reduce worrying in persons with visual and intellectual disabilities.","authors":"Evelien van Wingerden, Emilia Barakova, Tino Lourens, Paula S Sterkenburg","doi":"10.1111/jar.12801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study explored the use of a robot-mediated therapeutic intervention in persons with visual and intellectual disabilities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Three robot-mediated intervention sessions were developed to teach three coping skills for worrying. Effectiveness was examined using a multiple-baseline case study design (N = 7). Baseline, pre-intervention and post-intervention assessments included social validity, severity of worrying (PSWQ-C-NL), and observations by caregivers (SDQ). Short checklists on worrying were repeated throughout baseline and intervention stages. Transcripts of the sessions were analysed for participants' emotional openness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Social validity was equally high before and after the intervention. The intervention did not impact the severity of worrying, although mentor caregivers reported a lower impact of personal difficulties for participants. We found no change in self-disclosure towards the robot over sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The participants' positive responses warrant further exploration of using robot-mediated therapy for persons with visual and intellectual disabilities. Recommendations for additional adaptations are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","volume":"34 1","pages":"229-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/50/76/JAR-34-229.PMC7821017.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study explored the use of a robot-mediated therapeutic intervention in persons with visual and intellectual disabilities.

Method: Three robot-mediated intervention sessions were developed to teach three coping skills for worrying. Effectiveness was examined using a multiple-baseline case study design (N = 7). Baseline, pre-intervention and post-intervention assessments included social validity, severity of worrying (PSWQ-C-NL), and observations by caregivers (SDQ). Short checklists on worrying were repeated throughout baseline and intervention stages. Transcripts of the sessions were analysed for participants' emotional openness.

Results: Social validity was equally high before and after the intervention. The intervention did not impact the severity of worrying, although mentor caregivers reported a lower impact of personal difficulties for participants. We found no change in self-disclosure towards the robot over sessions.

Conclusions: The participants' positive responses warrant further exploration of using robot-mediated therapy for persons with visual and intellectual disabilities. Recommendations for additional adaptations are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以机器人为媒介的治疗,减少视力和智力残疾人的担忧。
背景本研究探讨了以机器人为媒介的治疗干预在视障和智障人士中的应用:方法:开发了三个以机器人为媒介的干预课程,教授三种应对担忧的技能。采用多基线案例研究设计(N = 7)对干预效果进行了检验。基线、干预前和干预后评估包括社会有效性、担忧的严重程度(PSWQ-C-NL)和护理人员的观察结果(SDQ)。在整个基线和干预阶段,都会重复进行有关担忧的简短核对表。对参与者的情绪开放性进行了分析:结果:干预前后的社会效度同样很高。虽然指导照顾者报告说参与者个人困难的影响较小,但干预并没有影响担忧的严重程度。结论:参与者的积极反应值得我们进一步探讨:结论:参与者的积极反应表明,我们有理由进一步探索针对视障和智障人士使用机器人辅助治疗的方法。本文还讨论了其他调整建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Burnout Among Staff Working in Services for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Outcomes of a Creative Ability-Based Intervention: Advancing Independence in Learners With Severe Intellectual Disability. Childhood and Adulthood Predictors of Community Participation by Autistic Adults With and Without Intellectual Disability. Proxy-report in individuals with intellectual disability: A scoping review. Video-blogs and linguistic simplification for students with intellectual disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1