The multiplex social environments of young Black men who have sex with men: How online and offline social structures impact HIV prevention and sex behavior engagement.

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Social Structure Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.21307/joss-2019-007
Lindsay E Young, Kayo Fujimoto, Leigh Alon, Liang Zhang, John A Schneider
{"title":"The multiplex social environments of young Black men who have sex with men: How online and offline social structures impact HIV prevention and sex behavior engagement.","authors":"Lindsay E Young,&nbsp;Kayo Fujimoto,&nbsp;Leigh Alon,&nbsp;Liang Zhang,&nbsp;John A Schneider","doi":"10.21307/joss-2019-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United States, young Black men who have sex with men (YBMSM) remain disproportionately affected by HIV. The social networks in which YBMSM are embedded are generally understood to be critical factors in understanding their vulnerability. In this study, we acknowledge the relational richness of YBMSMs' social environments (what we define as multiplexity) and their increasing prioritization of online social networking sites (SNS). Specifically, we investigate whether protective and/or risky features of YBMSMs' Facebook friendships and group affiliations are related to their HIV prevention and sex behavior engagement, while also accounting for features of their offline confidant (or support) and sex networks. Using data from a population-based cohort study of YBMSM living in Chicago (N=268), we perform a series of multiple logistic regression analyses to examine associations between features of YBMSMs' Facebook, confidant, and sexual networks with three prevention outcomes and three sex behavior outcomes, while also controlling for factors at the individual and structural levels. Results show that network features play a more significant role in predicting engagement in sex behaviors than prevention behaviors. Specifically, having more confidants, having confidants who are family members, meeting sex partners online, having more YBMSM Facebook friends, belonging to Facebook groups with an LGBTQ focus, and having greater subject diversity in one's Facebook group affiliations were significantly associated with one or more sex behavior outcomes. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of our findings for HIV prevention intervention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":35236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Structure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449318/pdf/nihms-1035645.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Structure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/joss-2019-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In the United States, young Black men who have sex with men (YBMSM) remain disproportionately affected by HIV. The social networks in which YBMSM are embedded are generally understood to be critical factors in understanding their vulnerability. In this study, we acknowledge the relational richness of YBMSMs' social environments (what we define as multiplexity) and their increasing prioritization of online social networking sites (SNS). Specifically, we investigate whether protective and/or risky features of YBMSMs' Facebook friendships and group affiliations are related to their HIV prevention and sex behavior engagement, while also accounting for features of their offline confidant (or support) and sex networks. Using data from a population-based cohort study of YBMSM living in Chicago (N=268), we perform a series of multiple logistic regression analyses to examine associations between features of YBMSMs' Facebook, confidant, and sexual networks with three prevention outcomes and three sex behavior outcomes, while also controlling for factors at the individual and structural levels. Results show that network features play a more significant role in predicting engagement in sex behaviors than prevention behaviors. Specifically, having more confidants, having confidants who are family members, meeting sex partners online, having more YBMSM Facebook friends, belonging to Facebook groups with an LGBTQ focus, and having greater subject diversity in one's Facebook group affiliations were significantly associated with one or more sex behavior outcomes. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of our findings for HIV prevention intervention efforts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻黑人男男性行为的多重社会环境:线上和线下社会结构如何影响艾滋病预防和性行为参与。
在美国,与男性发生性关系的年轻黑人男性(YBMSM)仍然不成比例地受到艾滋病毒的影响。人们普遍认为,YBMSM所处的社会网络是了解其脆弱性的关键因素。在本研究中,我们承认年轻男同性恋者社交环境的关系丰富性(我们将其定义为多样性)以及他们对在线社交网站(SNS)的日益重视。具体来说,我们调查了YBMSMs的Facebook友谊和团体关系的保护性和/或风险特征是否与他们的艾滋病毒预防和性行为参与有关,同时也考虑了他们的离线知己(或支持)和性网络的特征。利用一项基于人群的队列研究数据(N=268),我们进行了一系列多元逻辑回归分析,以检验YBMSM的Facebook、知己和性网络特征与三种预防结果和三种性行为结果之间的关系,同时还控制了个体和结构层面的因素。结果表明,网络特征对性行为投入的预测作用比预防行为更显著。具体来说,有更多的知己,有家庭成员的知己,在网上结识性伴侣,有更多的YBMSM Facebook好友,属于关注LGBTQ的Facebook群组,以及在Facebook群组中拥有更大的主题多样性,这些都与一种或多种性行为结果显著相关。最后,我们讨论了我们的研究结果对艾滋病预防干预工作的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social Structure
Journal of Social Structure Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Living in Networks: The Dynamics of Social Relations A Network Analysis of Twitter's Crackdown on the QAnon Conversation An Analysis of Relations Among European Countries Based on UEFA European Football Championship Syndicate Women: Gender and Networks in Chicago Organized Crime Advances in Network Clustering and Blockmodeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1