Optimizing Sample Size Allocation and Power in a Bayesian Two-Stage Drop-The-Losers Design.

IF 1.8 4区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY American Statistician Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-06-24 DOI:10.1080/00031305.2019.1610065
Alex Karanevich, Richard Meier, Stefan Graw, Anna McGlothlin, Byron Gajewski
{"title":"Optimizing Sample Size Allocation and Power in a Bayesian Two-Stage Drop-The-Losers Design.","authors":"Alex Karanevich,&nbsp;Richard Meier,&nbsp;Stefan Graw,&nbsp;Anna McGlothlin,&nbsp;Byron Gajewski","doi":"10.1080/00031305.2019.1610065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When a researcher desires to test several treatment arms against a control arm, a two-stage adaptive design can be more efficient than a single-stage design where patients are equally allocated to all treatment arms and the control. We see this type of approach in clinical trials as a seamless Phase II - Phase III design. These designs require more statistical support and are less straightforward to plan and analyze than a standard single-stage design. To diminish the barriers associated with a Bayesian two-stage drop-the-losers design, we built a user-friendly point-and-click graphical user interface with <i>R Shiny</i> to aid researchers in planning such designs by allowing them to easily obtain trial operating characteristics, estimate statistical power and sample size, and optimize patient allocation in each stage to maximize power. We assume that endpoints are distributed normally with unknown but common variance between treatments. We recommend this software as an easy way to engage statisticians and researchers in two-stage designs as well as to actively investigate the power of two-stage designs relative to more traditional approaches. The software is freely available at https://github.com/stefangraw/Allocation-Power-Optimizer.</p>","PeriodicalId":50801,"journal":{"name":"American Statistician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00031305.2019.1610065","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Statistician","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1610065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When a researcher desires to test several treatment arms against a control arm, a two-stage adaptive design can be more efficient than a single-stage design where patients are equally allocated to all treatment arms and the control. We see this type of approach in clinical trials as a seamless Phase II - Phase III design. These designs require more statistical support and are less straightforward to plan and analyze than a standard single-stage design. To diminish the barriers associated with a Bayesian two-stage drop-the-losers design, we built a user-friendly point-and-click graphical user interface with R Shiny to aid researchers in planning such designs by allowing them to easily obtain trial operating characteristics, estimate statistical power and sample size, and optimize patient allocation in each stage to maximize power. We assume that endpoints are distributed normally with unknown but common variance between treatments. We recommend this software as an easy way to engage statisticians and researchers in two-stage designs as well as to actively investigate the power of two-stage designs relative to more traditional approaches. The software is freely available at https://github.com/stefangraw/Allocation-Power-Optimizer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝叶斯两阶段输掉输家设计中的样本容量分配和功率优化。
当研究人员希望测试几个治疗组和一个对照组时,两阶段自适应设计可能比单阶段设计更有效,单阶段设计将患者平均分配到所有治疗组和对照组。我们认为这种方法在临床试验中是一种无缝的II期- III期设计。这些设计需要更多的统计支持,并且比标准的单级设计更不容易规划和分析。为了减少与贝叶斯两阶段抛弃失败者设计相关的障碍,我们使用R Shiny构建了一个用户友好的点击式图形用户界面,帮助研究人员规划此类设计,使他们能够轻松获得试验操作特征,估计统计功率和样本量,并优化每个阶段的患者分配以最大化功率。我们假设端点正态分布,处理之间有未知但共同的方差。我们推荐这个软件作为一个简单的方法,让统计学家和研究人员参与两阶段设计,并积极调查两阶段设计相对于更传统的方法的力量。该软件可在https://github.com/stefangraw/Allocation-Power-Optimizer免费获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Statistician
American Statistician 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Are you looking for general-interest articles about current national and international statistical problems and programs; interesting and fun articles of a general nature about statistics and its applications; or the teaching of statistics? Then you are looking for The American Statistician (TAS), published quarterly by the American Statistical Association. TAS contains timely articles organized into the following sections: Statistical Practice, General, Teacher''s Corner, History Corner, Interdisciplinary, Statistical Computing and Graphics, Reviews of Books and Teaching Materials, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Causal Inference with Complex Surveys: A Unified Perspective on Sample Selection and Exposure Selection Performance Analysis of NSUM Estimators in Social-Network Topologies Cross-validatory Z-Residual for Diagnosing Shared Frailty Models A Pareto tail plot without moment restrictions Sparse-group boosting: Unbiased group and variable selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1