Differences in cardiorespiratory responses of young and senior male endurance athletes to maximal graded exercise test.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Physiology international Pub Date : 2020-09-29 Print Date: 2020-10-17 DOI:10.1556/2060.2020.00032
M Michalis, K J Finn, R Podstawski, S Gabnai, Á Koller, A Cziráki, M Szántó, Z Alföldi, F Ihász
{"title":"Differences in cardiorespiratory responses of young and senior male endurance athletes to maximal graded exercise test.","authors":"M Michalis,&nbsp;K J Finn,&nbsp;R Podstawski,&nbsp;S Gabnai,&nbsp;Á Koller,&nbsp;A Cziráki,&nbsp;M Szántó,&nbsp;Z Alföldi,&nbsp;F Ihász","doi":"10.1556/2060.2020.00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within recent years the popularity of sportive activities amongst older people, particularly competitive activities within certain age groups has increased. The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in the cardiorespiratory output at anaerobic threshold and at maximal power, output during an incremental exercise, among senior and young athletes. Ten elderly male subjects [mean (SD) age: 68.45 ± 9.32 years] and eight young male subjects [mean (SD) age: 25.87 ± 5.87 years] performed an incremental exercise test on a treadmill ergometer. No significant differences in body size were evident; however, the differences between the groups for peak power (451.62 ± 49 vs. 172.4 ± 32.2 W), aerobic capacity (57.97 ± 7.5 vs. 40.36 ± 8.6 mL kg-1 min-1), maximal heart rate (190.87 ± 9.2 vs. 158.5 ± 9.1 beats min-1), peak blood lactate (11 ± 1.7 vs. 7.3 ± 1.4 mmol L-1), and % VO2max at ventilatory thresholds (93.18 ± 4.3 vs. 79.29 ± 9.9%) were significantly lower in the senior athletes. The power output at anaerobic threshold was also higher (392 ± 48 vs. 151 ± 23 W) in the young athletes, explaining the significant difference in terms of performance between these groups. We have observed an evident deterioration in some of the cardiovascular parameters; however, the submaximal exercise economy seems to be preserved with aging. Exercise economy (i.e. metabolic cost of sustained submaximal exercise) was not different considerably with age in endurance-trained adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":20058,"journal":{"name":"Physiology international","volume":"107 3","pages":"444-454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2060.2020.00032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Within recent years the popularity of sportive activities amongst older people, particularly competitive activities within certain age groups has increased. The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in the cardiorespiratory output at anaerobic threshold and at maximal power, output during an incremental exercise, among senior and young athletes. Ten elderly male subjects [mean (SD) age: 68.45 ± 9.32 years] and eight young male subjects [mean (SD) age: 25.87 ± 5.87 years] performed an incremental exercise test on a treadmill ergometer. No significant differences in body size were evident; however, the differences between the groups for peak power (451.62 ± 49 vs. 172.4 ± 32.2 W), aerobic capacity (57.97 ± 7.5 vs. 40.36 ± 8.6 mL kg-1 min-1), maximal heart rate (190.87 ± 9.2 vs. 158.5 ± 9.1 beats min-1), peak blood lactate (11 ± 1.7 vs. 7.3 ± 1.4 mmol L-1), and % VO2max at ventilatory thresholds (93.18 ± 4.3 vs. 79.29 ± 9.9%) were significantly lower in the senior athletes. The power output at anaerobic threshold was also higher (392 ± 48 vs. 151 ± 23 W) in the young athletes, explaining the significant difference in terms of performance between these groups. We have observed an evident deterioration in some of the cardiovascular parameters; however, the submaximal exercise economy seems to be preserved with aging. Exercise economy (i.e. metabolic cost of sustained submaximal exercise) was not different considerably with age in endurance-trained adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青年和老年男性耐力运动员心肺反应对最大分级运动试验的差异。
近年来,老年人中体育活动,特别是某些年龄组的竞争性活动越来越受欢迎。本研究的目的是评估老年和年轻运动员在无氧阈值和最大功率时,增量运动中心肺输出量的差异。10名老年男性受试者[平均(SD)年龄:68.45±9.32岁]和8名年轻男性受试者[平均(SD)年龄:25.87±5.87岁]在跑步机测力仪上进行增量运动试验。体型差异无统计学意义;然而,老年运动员的峰值功率(451.62±49 vs. 172.4±32.2 W)、有氧能力(57.97±7.5 vs. 40.36±8.6 mL kg-1 min-1)、最大心率(190.87±9.2 vs. 158.5±9.1次min-1)、峰值血乳酸(11±1.7 vs. 7.3±1.4 mmol L-1)和呼吸阈值% VO2max(93.18±4.3 vs. 79.29±9.9%)组间差异明显较低。年轻运动员在无氧阈下的功率输出也更高(392±48 W vs 151±23 W),这解释了两组之间表现的显著差异。我们观察到一些心血管参数明显恶化;然而,亚极限运动经济似乎随着年龄的增长而保持不变。在耐力训练的成年人中,运动经济性(即持续亚极限运动的代谢成本)与年龄没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiology international
Physiology international Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The journal provides a forum for important new research papers written by eminent scientists on experimental medical sciences. Papers reporting on both original work and review articles in the fields of basic and clinical physiology, pathophysiology (from the subcellular organization level up to the oranizmic one), as well as related disciplines, including history of physiological sciences, are accepted.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTION NOTE TO: The effects of sericin in recovering spermatogenesis and sexual hormone levels in diabetic rats. RETRACTION NOTE TO: The effects of sericin in recovering spermatogenesis and sexual hormone levels in diabetic rats. Sesamol protects against LPS-induced inflammation in rat peritoneal macrophages by promoting SIRT1-induced repression of NF-κB. The Hungarian adaptation of the functional status questionnaire: Examination of validity and reliability. Analysis of results of radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1