Comparison of Kristjansson Respiratory Score and Wang Respiratory Score in infants with bronchiolitis in a hospital emergency department.

Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-21 DOI:10.1142/S1013702520500146
Frederico Ramos Pinto, Liane Correia-Costa, Inês Azevedo
{"title":"Comparison of Kristjansson Respiratory Score and Wang Respiratory Score in infants with bronchiolitis in a hospital emergency department.","authors":"Frederico Ramos Pinto, Liane Correia-Costa, Inês Azevedo","doi":"10.1142/S1013702520500146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several respiratory scores have been created to evaluate bronchiolitis' severity level, but it is still not clear which is the best score. The aim of this study is to compare the Wang Respiratory Score (WRS) and the Kristjansson Respiratory Score (KRS) in the setting of an emergency room.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective observational study with 60 infants with bronchiolitis admitted to a paediatric emergency department. For both scores, we assessed inter-rater reliability between two different health professionals (physician and physiotherapist), internal consistency, and correlation with SpO<sub>2</sub> testing the intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC), weighted kappa, Cronbach <math><mi>α</mi></math> coefficient and Spearman tests, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-rater reliability was higher in KRS (ICC 0.79) and the Cronbach <math><mi>α</mi></math> and weighted kappa had similar values in KRS versus WRS. The correlation between the KRS/WRS and SpO<sub>2</sub> was poor/moderate upon admission and discharge for the first observer and the second observer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the internal consistency was similar in both scores, inter-rater reliability of KRS was higher than WRS, which allows us to conclude that it would have more consistent results when used to assess bronchiolitis' level of severity by health personnel in a busy hospital emergency room.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702520500146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Several respiratory scores have been created to evaluate bronchiolitis' severity level, but it is still not clear which is the best score. The aim of this study is to compare the Wang Respiratory Score (WRS) and the Kristjansson Respiratory Score (KRS) in the setting of an emergency room.

Methods: We performed a prospective observational study with 60 infants with bronchiolitis admitted to a paediatric emergency department. For both scores, we assessed inter-rater reliability between two different health professionals (physician and physiotherapist), internal consistency, and correlation with SpO2 testing the intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC), weighted kappa, Cronbach α coefficient and Spearman tests, respectively.

Results: The inter-rater reliability was higher in KRS (ICC 0.79) and the Cronbach α and weighted kappa had similar values in KRS versus WRS. The correlation between the KRS/WRS and SpO2 was poor/moderate upon admission and discharge for the first observer and the second observer.

Conclusions: While the internal consistency was similar in both scores, inter-rater reliability of KRS was higher than WRS, which allows us to conclude that it would have more consistent results when used to assess bronchiolitis' level of severity by health personnel in a busy hospital emergency room.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
比较医院急诊科支气管炎患儿的 Kristjansson 呼吸评分和 Wang 呼吸评分。
目的:目前已有几种呼吸评分方法用于评估支气管炎的严重程度,但仍不清楚哪种评分方法最好。本研究旨在比较急诊室环境中的王氏呼吸评分(WRS)和克里斯詹森呼吸评分(KRS):我们对儿科急诊室收治的 60 名患有支气管炎的婴儿进行了前瞻性观察研究。对于这两项评分,我们分别通过类内相关系数(ICC)、加权卡帕、克朗巴赫α系数和斯皮尔曼检验,评估了两名不同医护人员(医生和物理治疗师)之间的评分间可靠性、内部一致性以及与血氧饱和度的相关性:KRS 的评分者间可靠性更高(ICC 0.79),KRS 与 WRS 的 Cronbach α 和加权卡帕值相似。在入院和出院时,第一位观察者和第二位观察者的 KRS/WRS 与 SpO2 之间的相关性较差/中等:虽然两种评分的内部一致性相似,但 KRS 的评分者间可靠性高于 WRS,因此我们认为,在繁忙的医院急诊室,医务人员用 KRS 评估支气管炎的严重程度时,其结果会更加一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1