Physician-patient agreement at a rheumatology consultation - construction and validation of a consultation assessment instrument.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY Acta reumatologica portuguesa Pub Date : 2020-04-01
Joana Ramos Rodrigues, Diogo Fonseca, Vera Vicente, Daniela Faria, Joana Neves, Joana Silva, Soraia Azevedo, Daniela Peixoto, Sérgio Alcino, Carmo Afonso, Filipa Texeira, José António Costa
{"title":"Physician-patient agreement at a rheumatology consultation - construction and validation of a consultation assessment instrument.","authors":"Joana Ramos Rodrigues,&nbsp;Diogo Fonseca,&nbsp;Vera Vicente,&nbsp;Daniela Faria,&nbsp;Joana Neves,&nbsp;Joana Silva,&nbsp;Soraia Azevedo,&nbsp;Daniela Peixoto,&nbsp;Sérgio Alcino,&nbsp;Carmo Afonso,&nbsp;Filipa Texeira,&nbsp;José António Costa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>After consultations, the physician's perceptions differ from the patient's perceptions concerning illness level, cause, and nature of the problem and content of the consultation. Agreement on problems requiring follow-up was associated with a better outcome. The primary aim of this study was to build and validate an instrument that could assess physician-patient agreement in the rheumatology consultation. The secondary objective was to assess agreement association with patient's clinical and sociodemographic data.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A ten-item questionnaire - \"Consultation Assessment Instrument\" (CAI) - was developed for this study to assess the physician-patient agreement. Ten physicians and 102 patients diagnosed with an inflammatory joint disease under biological therapy were included. The items were evaluated and the index of proportional agreement for the dichotomized answers \"agree\" (Ppos) and \"disagree\" (Pneg) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consultation satisfaction was the item with the highest agreement. On the opposite end, the item about the explanation of treatment importance was the item with the lowest agreement between patient and physician. Except for one item, the high level of agreement between patient and physician was due to a higher Ppos. Index of proportional agreement was high for 9 of the 10 items (0.816≤ Iv ≤0.990). Patients with lower disease activity scores had a more positive experience. A good internal consistency was obtained for both patient's and physician's questionnaire (α = 0.88 and α = 0.80, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both patient and physician showed a positive experience towards Rheumatology consultation. Physician-patient agreement was high in the majority of the consultation aspects (mean Iv = 0,93). A good internal consistency was obtained for both patient's and physician's questionnaire. CAI could be useful as a mental checklist in daily practice or as an educational tool for training consultation skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":7229,"journal":{"name":"Acta reumatologica portuguesa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta reumatologica portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: After consultations, the physician's perceptions differ from the patient's perceptions concerning illness level, cause, and nature of the problem and content of the consultation. Agreement on problems requiring follow-up was associated with a better outcome. The primary aim of this study was to build and validate an instrument that could assess physician-patient agreement in the rheumatology consultation. The secondary objective was to assess agreement association with patient's clinical and sociodemographic data.

Materials and methods: A ten-item questionnaire - "Consultation Assessment Instrument" (CAI) - was developed for this study to assess the physician-patient agreement. Ten physicians and 102 patients diagnosed with an inflammatory joint disease under biological therapy were included. The items were evaluated and the index of proportional agreement for the dichotomized answers "agree" (Ppos) and "disagree" (Pneg) was calculated.

Results: Consultation satisfaction was the item with the highest agreement. On the opposite end, the item about the explanation of treatment importance was the item with the lowest agreement between patient and physician. Except for one item, the high level of agreement between patient and physician was due to a higher Ppos. Index of proportional agreement was high for 9 of the 10 items (0.816≤ Iv ≤0.990). Patients with lower disease activity scores had a more positive experience. A good internal consistency was obtained for both patient's and physician's questionnaire (α = 0.88 and α = 0.80, respectively).

Conclusions: Both patient and physician showed a positive experience towards Rheumatology consultation. Physician-patient agreement was high in the majority of the consultation aspects (mean Iv = 0,93). A good internal consistency was obtained for both patient's and physician's questionnaire. CAI could be useful as a mental checklist in daily practice or as an educational tool for training consultation skills.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风湿病会诊的医患协议——会诊评估工具的构建和验证。
目的:会诊后,医生对疾病程度、病因、问题性质和会诊内容的看法与患者不同。在需要随访的问题上达成一致与更好的结果相关。本研究的主要目的是建立并验证一种可以评估风湿病会诊中医患一致性的工具。次要目的是评估与患者临床和社会人口数据的一致性关联。材料与方法:本研究采用“会诊评估工具”(CAI)十项问卷来评估医患协议。10名医生和102名诊断为炎症性关节疾病的患者接受了生物治疗。对题项进行评价,计算二分类答案“同意”(Ppos)和“不同意”(Pneg)的比例一致性指数。结果:咨询满意度是满意度最高的项目。另一方面,关于治疗重要性的解释是患者和医生之间一致性最低的项目。除了一项外,医患之间的高度一致是由于更高的Ppos。10个项目中有9个项目比例一致性指数较高(0.816≤Iv≤0.990)。疾病活动度得分较低的患者有更积极的体验。患者问卷与医师问卷具有较好的内部一致性(α = 0.88、α = 0.80)。结论:患者和医生对风湿病会诊都表现出积极的体验。在大多数咨询方面,医患一致性很高(平均Iv = 0.93)。患者问卷与医师问卷具有良好的内部一致性。CAI可以作为日常实践中的心理检查表或作为培训咨询技能的教育工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta reumatologica portuguesa
Acta reumatologica portuguesa 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Reumatólogica Portuguesa is a scientific peer reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatic diseases and related to Rheumatology. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, clinical cases, images in rheumatology, letters to the editor and clinical teaching (e.g. guidelines and clinical protocols). Published since 1973, Acta Reumatológica Portuguesa is the official scientific publication of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology, a non-profit organization that promotes the knowledge and investigation of rheumatic diseases and the development of Rheumatology.
期刊最新文献
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis - the incomplete puzzle. Large-vessel vasculitis induced by pegfilgrastim. How did we get here? Do mobility exercises in different environments have different effects in ankylosing spondylitis? Evolution of clinical, histological and serological features in a Primary Sjὄgren´s Syndrome cohort and the limitations of the current classification criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1