Efficacy and Tolerability of Lamotrigine in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Q3 Medicine Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2020-09-14
Mehak Pahwa, Nicolas A Nuñez, Boney Joseph, Ashok Seshadri, Danielle J Gerberi, Mark A Frye, Balwinder Singh
{"title":"Efficacy and Tolerability of Lamotrigine in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mehak Pahwa, Nicolas A Nuñez, Boney Joseph, Ashok Seshadri, Danielle J Gerberi, Mark A Frye, Balwinder Singh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) have a high prevalence of mood disorders. Lamotrigine (LAM) is often used as an off-label therapeutic option for BPD. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and tolerability of LAM for the treatment of BPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We comprehensively searched electronic databases for eligible studies from the inception of databases to September 2019. Outcomes investigated were BPD dimensions, tolerability, and adverse events. Quality assessments were completed for the included studies. Data were summarized using random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 619 records, five studies, including three randomized controlled trials (RCT; N = 330) were included for the qualitative analysis. A meta-analysis conducted on two RCTs measuring LAM efficacy at 12 weeks, showed no statistically significant difference at 12 weeks (SMD: -0.04; 95% CI: -0.49, 0.41; p = 0.87; I<sup>2</sup> = 38%) and at study endpoints (SMD: 0.18, 95%CI: -0.89, 1.26; p = 0.74; I<sup>2</sup> = 86%) as compared to placebo. Sensitivity analysis on three RCTs measuring impulsivity/aggression showed no statistically significant difference between LAM and placebo (SMD: -1.84, 95% CI: -3.94, 0.23; p = 0.08; I<sup>2</sup> = 95%). LAM was well tolerated, and quality assessment of the included trials was good.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest there is limited data regarding efficacy of lamotrigine in BPD. There was no consistent evidence of lamotrigine's efficacy for the core symptom domains of BPD. Future studies should focus on examining targeted domains of BPD to clarify sub-phenotypes and individualized treatment for patients with BPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"50 4","pages":"118-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511148/pdf/PB-50-4-118.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) have a high prevalence of mood disorders. Lamotrigine (LAM) is often used as an off-label therapeutic option for BPD. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and tolerability of LAM for the treatment of BPD.

Methods: We comprehensively searched electronic databases for eligible studies from the inception of databases to September 2019. Outcomes investigated were BPD dimensions, tolerability, and adverse events. Quality assessments were completed for the included studies. Data were summarized using random-effects model.

Results: Of the 619 records, five studies, including three randomized controlled trials (RCT; N = 330) were included for the qualitative analysis. A meta-analysis conducted on two RCTs measuring LAM efficacy at 12 weeks, showed no statistically significant difference at 12 weeks (SMD: -0.04; 95% CI: -0.49, 0.41; p = 0.87; I2 = 38%) and at study endpoints (SMD: 0.18, 95%CI: -0.89, 1.26; p = 0.74; I2 = 86%) as compared to placebo. Sensitivity analysis on three RCTs measuring impulsivity/aggression showed no statistically significant difference between LAM and placebo (SMD: -1.84, 95% CI: -3.94, 0.23; p = 0.08; I2 = 95%). LAM was well tolerated, and quality assessment of the included trials was good.

Conclusions: Our results suggest there is limited data regarding efficacy of lamotrigine in BPD. There was no consistent evidence of lamotrigine's efficacy for the core symptom domains of BPD. Future studies should focus on examining targeted domains of BPD to clarify sub-phenotypes and individualized treatment for patients with BPD.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉莫三嗪治疗边缘型人格障碍的疗效和耐受性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者有较高的情绪障碍患病率。拉莫三嗪(lamotriine, LAM)常被用作BPD的非适应症治疗选择。我们旨在进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估LAM治疗BPD的疗效和耐受性。方法:从数据库建立到2019年9月,我们全面检索电子数据库中符合条件的研究。研究结果包括BPD尺寸、耐受性和不良事件。对纳入的研究完成了质量评估。采用随机效应模型对数据进行汇总。结果:在619份记录中,5项研究,包括3项随机对照试验(RCT;N = 330)进行定性分析。对两项测量12周LAM疗效的随机对照试验进行荟萃分析,结果显示12周时无统计学差异(SMD: -0.04;95% ci: -0.49, 0.41;P = 0.87;I2 = 38%)和在研究终点(SMD: 0.18, 95%CI: -0.89, 1.26;P = 0.74;I2 = 86%)。对三个测量冲动/攻击的随机对照试验的敏感性分析显示,LAM与安慰剂之间无统计学差异(SMD: -1.84, 95% CI: -3.94, 0.23;P = 0.08;I2 = 95%)。LAM耐受性良好,纳入试验的质量评价良好。结论:我们的研究结果表明,关于拉莫三嗪治疗BPD的疗效的数据有限。没有一致的证据表明拉莫三嗪对BPD的核心症状域有效。未来的研究应侧重于检测BPD的靶向区域,以阐明BPD患者的亚表型和个体化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology bulletin
Psychopharmacology bulletin PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Related to Duloxetine-Atomoxetine Combination in an Adolescent with ADHD and Comorbid GAD. On the Origins of MAOI Misconceptions: Reaffirming their Role in Melancholic Depression. Alzheimer's and Dementia Guidelines and Tables. Captagone & Morbid Jealousy. Are Standardized Tests Sensitive to Early Cognitive Change in Parkinson's Disease?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1