[Impact and prestige indicators of SciELO network health sciences journals: comparative study.]

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Revista Espanola De Salud Publica Pub Date : 2020-09-09
Cristina Bojo Canales, Javier Sanz-Valero
{"title":"[Impact and prestige indicators of SciELO network health sciences journals: comparative study.]","authors":"Cristina Bojo Canales, Javier Sanz-Valero","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of bibliometric indicators to measure the quality of scientific journals is a general practice in all areas of science. The WoS and Scopus databases continue to be the reference sources to obtain bibliographic indicators. Others such as SciELO network offer indicators about Ibero-American science, which are scarcely collected in WoS and Scopus. The aim of this work was to analyze the association of the indicators proposed by SciELO for health sciences journals, with the most widely used impact and indicators and to study the complementarity of the existing prestige indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analytical correlational study between SciELO indicators, with impact and prestige indicators from Journal Citation Report, Scopus and Web of Science. The results refer to 2018, the most recent and complete data available. Association between the qualitative variables was analyzed using the chi-square test, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for the quantitative variables using the Tukey method as a post hoc test. To obtain the relationship between quantitative variables, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used and Spearman's coefficient for ordinal variables. The level of significance used in all the hypothesis tests was α≤0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SciELO Impact Factor showed a weak correlation both, with Journal Citation Report (R=0.36; p=0.003), and Scopus Cite Score (R=0.39; p=0.001). The association between the H index of the Web of Science andthe H index of Scopus with the H index of SciELO was weak in both cases (R=0.45; p<0.001 and R=0.340; p=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Indicators proposed by SciELO, for health journals, did not show an association with those of WoS or Scopus. The weak correlation between Impact Factor and Cite Score with SciELO Impact Factor, converts the latter into a necessary \"metrics\" to assess journals excluded from the \"mainstream\" and fundamentally those from the Latin American region. The need of using the prestige indicators to fill in the impact indicators, has not been proven in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":47152,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","volume":"94 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11582893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The use of bibliometric indicators to measure the quality of scientific journals is a general practice in all areas of science. The WoS and Scopus databases continue to be the reference sources to obtain bibliographic indicators. Others such as SciELO network offer indicators about Ibero-American science, which are scarcely collected in WoS and Scopus. The aim of this work was to analyze the association of the indicators proposed by SciELO for health sciences journals, with the most widely used impact and indicators and to study the complementarity of the existing prestige indicators.

Methods: Analytical correlational study between SciELO indicators, with impact and prestige indicators from Journal Citation Report, Scopus and Web of Science. The results refer to 2018, the most recent and complete data available. Association between the qualitative variables was analyzed using the chi-square test, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for the quantitative variables using the Tukey method as a post hoc test. To obtain the relationship between quantitative variables, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used and Spearman's coefficient for ordinal variables. The level of significance used in all the hypothesis tests was α≤0.05.

Results: The SciELO Impact Factor showed a weak correlation both, with Journal Citation Report (R=0.36; p=0.003), and Scopus Cite Score (R=0.39; p=0.001). The association between the H index of the Web of Science andthe H index of Scopus with the H index of SciELO was weak in both cases (R=0.45; p<0.001 and R=0.340; p=0.003).

Conclusions: Indicators proposed by SciELO, for health journals, did not show an association with those of WoS or Scopus. The weak correlation between Impact Factor and Cite Score with SciELO Impact Factor, converts the latter into a necessary "metrics" to assess journals excluded from the "mainstream" and fundamentally those from the Latin American region. The need of using the prestige indicators to fill in the impact indicators, has not been proven in this study.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[SciELO网络健康科学期刊的影响力和声望指标:比较研究]。
目的:使用文献计量指标来衡量科学期刊的质量是所有科学领域的普遍做法。WoS 和 Scopus 数据库仍然是获取文献指标的参考来源。其他一些数据库,如 SciELO 网络,提供了 WoS 和 Scopus 很少收集的伊比利亚-美洲科学指标。这项工作的目的是分析 SciELO 提出的健康科学期刊指标与最广泛使用的影响和指标之间的关联,并研究现有声望指标的互补性:方法:SciELO指标与期刊引文报告、Scopus和Web of Science中的影响力和声望指标之间的相关性分析研究。研究结果参考了 2018 年的最新完整数据。定性变量之间的关联采用卡方检验进行分析,定量变量采用方差分析(ANOVA),并使用Tukey法进行事后检验。定量变量之间的关系采用皮尔逊相关系数,序数变量采用斯皮尔曼系数。所有假设检验的显著性水平均为α≤0.05:结果:SciELO 影响因子与期刊引文报告(R=0.36;P=0.003)和 Scopus 引用得分(R=0.39;P=0.001)均呈弱相关。Web of Science 的 H 指数和 Scopus 的 H 指数与 SciELO 的 H 指数之间的联系都很弱(R=0.45;p 结论:SciELO提出的健康期刊指标与WoS或Scopus的指标没有关联。影响因子和引文分数与 SciELO 影响因子之间的相关性很弱,这使后者成为评估被排除在 "主流 "期刊之外的期刊的必要 "指标",从根本上说,也是评估拉丁美洲地区期刊的必要 "指标"。本研究并未证明有必要使用声望指标来填补影响指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Recommendations for the patient during the treatment of colorectal cancer through the enhanced recovery.] [Chemical pollution, exposome and health in the Canary Islands population: An assessment of the situation.] [World Breastfeeding Week 2022: a call for deliberation.] [COVID-19 exposure setting, social and gender determinants in a mediterranean region.] [Effect of prebiotics, probiotics, and symbiotics on molecular markers of inflammation in obesity.]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1