Aristotle's lobster: the image in the text.

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY Theory in Biosciences Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-13 DOI:10.1007/s12064-020-00322-6
Alexander Fürst von Lieven, Marcel Humar, Gerhard Scholtz
{"title":"Aristotle's lobster: the image in the text.","authors":"Alexander Fürst von Lieven,&nbsp;Marcel Humar,&nbsp;Gerhard Scholtz","doi":"10.1007/s12064-020-00322-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Anatomai, a lost work written by Aristotle, must have contained a collection of various drawings and figures of species as well as their organs. In his texts (mainly the Historia animalium), Aristotle is often referring to the drawings after the description of species. Our study applies the method of the comparative view ('Vergleichendes Sehen') to provide an access to and reconstruction of Aristotle's lost illustrations based on his textual descriptions. As an example, we chose the treatment of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus L., 1758) in the Aristotelian corpus as a case study. First, we analyse the etymology of the Greek term astakós referring to the lobster and provide an overview on the putative synonyms. Second, we confront the textual basis of the description with several questions concerning the degree of abstraction, the relation between text and image, and the spatial orientation of the image. Finally, we present a step-by-step reconstruction of Aristotle's illustrations of the lobster based on the various passages dealing with its anatomy in the text of the Historia animalium. The problems which arise by a confrontation of the textual basis with hypothetical images are discussed at a more general level. We conclude that this kind of a text-based image reconstruction is only possible if the object described by Aristotle is unambiguously identifiable and still visually accessible.</p>","PeriodicalId":54428,"journal":{"name":"Theory in Biosciences","volume":"140 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12064-020-00322-6","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory in Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-020-00322-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Anatomai, a lost work written by Aristotle, must have contained a collection of various drawings and figures of species as well as their organs. In his texts (mainly the Historia animalium), Aristotle is often referring to the drawings after the description of species. Our study applies the method of the comparative view ('Vergleichendes Sehen') to provide an access to and reconstruction of Aristotle's lost illustrations based on his textual descriptions. As an example, we chose the treatment of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus L., 1758) in the Aristotelian corpus as a case study. First, we analyse the etymology of the Greek term astakós referring to the lobster and provide an overview on the putative synonyms. Second, we confront the textual basis of the description with several questions concerning the degree of abstraction, the relation between text and image, and the spatial orientation of the image. Finally, we present a step-by-step reconstruction of Aristotle's illustrations of the lobster based on the various passages dealing with its anatomy in the text of the Historia animalium. The problems which arise by a confrontation of the textual basis with hypothetical images are discussed at a more general level. We conclude that this kind of a text-based image reconstruction is only possible if the object described by Aristotle is unambiguously identifiable and still visually accessible.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚里士多德的龙虾:文本中的形象。
《解剖学》是亚里士多德写的一本失传的著作,其中一定包含了各种各样的物种及其器官的图画和图形。在他的著作(主要是《动物历史》)中,亚里士多德经常在描述物种之后引用图画。我们的研究采用比较观点(Vergleichendes Sehen)的方法,根据亚里士多德的文本描述,提供了对他丢失的插图的访问和重建。作为一个例子,我们选择了亚里士多德语料库中对欧洲龙虾(Homarus gammarus L., 1758)的处理作为案例研究。首先,我们分析了希腊词汇astakós所指的龙虾的词源,并概述了假定的同义词。其次,我们面对描述的文本基础,涉及抽象程度,文本与图像之间的关系以及图像的空间方向等几个问题。最后,我们将根据《动物历史》中有关龙虾解剖的不同段落,逐步重建亚里士多德关于龙虾的插图。在更一般的层面上讨论了文本基础与假设图像的对抗所产生的问题。我们得出的结论是,这种基于文本的图像重建只有在亚里士多德描述的对象是明确可识别的并且仍然可以在视觉上访问时才有可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Theory in Biosciences
Theory in Biosciences 生物-生物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Theory in Biosciences focuses on new concepts in theoretical biology. It also includes analytical and modelling approaches as well as philosophical and historical issues. Central topics are: Artificial Life; Bioinformatics with a focus on novel methods, phenomena, and interpretations; Bioinspired Modeling; Complexity, Robustness, and Resilience; Embodied Cognition; Evolutionary Biology; Evo-Devo; Game Theoretic Modeling; Genetics; History of Biology; Language Evolution; Mathematical Biology; Origin of Life; Philosophy of Biology; Population Biology; Systems Biology; Theoretical Ecology; Theoretical Molecular Biology; Theoretical Neuroscience & Cognition.
期刊最新文献
Symmetry breaking and mismatch in the torsional mechanism of ATP synthesis by FOF1-ATP synthase: mathematical number theory proof and its chemical and biological implications. Forbidden codon combinations in error-detecting circular codes. A new symbiotic, holistic and gradualist model proposal for the concept of "living organism". Mathematical model of tumor immune microenvironment with application to the combined therapy targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and IL-10 cytokine antibody. Revisiting institutional punishment in the N-person prisoner's dilemma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1