Higher Self-Control, Less Deception: The Effect of Self-Control on Deception Behaviors.

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Cognitive Psychology Pub Date : 2020-07-14 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5709/acp-0299-3
Wei Fan, Mengmeng Ren, Wenjie Zhang, Pengxiang Xiao, Yiping Zhong
{"title":"Higher Self-Control, Less Deception: The Effect of Self-Control on Deception Behaviors.","authors":"Wei Fan,&nbsp;Mengmeng Ren,&nbsp;Wenjie Zhang,&nbsp;Pengxiang Xiao,&nbsp;Yiping Zhong","doi":"10.5709/acp-0299-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The self-control ability and self-control resources have a different influence on deception, but the cognition mechanism of this different influence has not been described yet. In this study, the event-related potentials (ERPs) technique was utilized to conduct two experiments exploring the effects of self-control ability and self-control resources on deception from two approaches. In Experiment 1, participants with different levels of self-control ability performed a visual perception task to measure deception and deception tendencies. The results revealed that individuals with low self-control ability exhibited more deceptive behaviors than did individuals with high self-control ability. Furthermore, individuals with high self-control ability evoked larger N2 and smaller P3 amplitudes than did individuals with low self-control ability. Experiment 2 involved selecting individuals with medium self-control ability. The Stroop task and a visual perception task were employed to investigate the influence of self-control resources on deception. The results showed that the depletion of self-control resources facilitated smaller N2 and larger P3 amplitudes than did non-depletion of self-control resources. In conclusion, these results suggest that individuals with high self-control ability are less likely to deceive others in order to obtain more benefits. When individuals have sufficient self-control resources, they resist temptation and reduce deception behaviors. Deception and deception tendencies may be more likely in people with low of self-control and whose self-control resources are depleted. In people with moderate self-control, deception was still regulated by self-depletion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51754,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","volume":"16 3","pages":"228-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/85/acp-16-3-302.PMC7562985.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0299-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The self-control ability and self-control resources have a different influence on deception, but the cognition mechanism of this different influence has not been described yet. In this study, the event-related potentials (ERPs) technique was utilized to conduct two experiments exploring the effects of self-control ability and self-control resources on deception from two approaches. In Experiment 1, participants with different levels of self-control ability performed a visual perception task to measure deception and deception tendencies. The results revealed that individuals with low self-control ability exhibited more deceptive behaviors than did individuals with high self-control ability. Furthermore, individuals with high self-control ability evoked larger N2 and smaller P3 amplitudes than did individuals with low self-control ability. Experiment 2 involved selecting individuals with medium self-control ability. The Stroop task and a visual perception task were employed to investigate the influence of self-control resources on deception. The results showed that the depletion of self-control resources facilitated smaller N2 and larger P3 amplitudes than did non-depletion of self-control resources. In conclusion, these results suggest that individuals with high self-control ability are less likely to deceive others in order to obtain more benefits. When individuals have sufficient self-control resources, they resist temptation and reduce deception behaviors. Deception and deception tendencies may be more likely in people with low of self-control and whose self-control resources are depleted. In people with moderate self-control, deception was still regulated by self-depletion.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高自控、低欺骗:自我控制对欺骗行为的影响。
自我控制能力和自我控制资源对欺骗有不同的影响,但这种不同影响的认知机制尚未被描述。本研究利用事件相关电位(event- correlation potential, ERPs)技术,从两个角度探讨了自我控制能力和自我控制资源对欺骗行为的影响。在实验1中,不同自我控制能力的被试通过视觉感知任务来测量欺骗行为和欺骗倾向。结果表明,自我控制能力低的个体比自我控制能力高的个体表现出更多的欺骗行为。自我控制能力高的个体比自我控制能力低的个体产生更大的N2和更小的P3波幅。实验二选择自我控制能力中等的个体。采用Stroop任务和视觉感知任务考察自我控制资源对欺骗行为的影响。结果表明,自我控制资源耗竭比自我控制资源未耗竭时,N2值更小,P3值更大。综上所述,这些结果表明,自我控制能力强的人不太可能为了获得更多的利益而欺骗他人。当个体有足够的自我控制资源时,他们会抵制诱惑,减少欺骗行为。欺骗和欺骗倾向可能更容易发生在自控能力低和自控能力枯竭的人身上。在适度自我控制的人群中,欺骗仍然受到自我消耗的调节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Cognitive Psychology
Advances in Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Coronavirus Anxiety as Mediator in the Relationship of Depression and Fear of Death among Polish Adults in the Second Half of Life Detrimental and Beneficial Effects in Ongoing and Lasting Collaborative Memory: Insight From the Emotional Timeout Procedure Sensory Overlap for Specific Memories Only Matters for Poor Memory Traces The Influence of Fit Between Regulatory Focus and Decision-Making Strategies on Moral Judgment The Two-Factor Structure of Cognitive Flexibility: Tempo of Switching and Overcoming of Prepotent Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1