Effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on cognition and brain in the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience cohort.

Brain and neuroscience advances Pub Date : 2020-10-07 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2398212820961704
Richard N Henson, Sana Suri, Ethan Knights, James B Rowe, Rogier A Kievit, Donald M Lyall, Dennis Chan, Else Eising, Simon E Fisher
{"title":"Effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on cognition and brain in the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience cohort.","authors":"Richard N Henson, Sana Suri, Ethan Knights, James B Rowe, Rogier A Kievit, Donald M Lyall, Dennis Chan, Else Eising, Simon E Fisher","doi":"10.1177/2398212820961704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polymorphisms in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene have been associated with individual differences in cognition, brain structure and brain function. For example, the ε4 allele has been associated with cognitive and brain impairment in old age and increased risk of dementia, while the ε2 allele has been claimed to be neuroprotective. According to the ‘antagonistic pleiotropy’ hypothesis, these polymorphisms have different effects across the lifespan, with ε4, for example, postulated to confer benefits on cognitive and brain functions earlier in life. In this stage 2 of the Registered Report – https://osf.io/bufc4, we report the results from the cognitive and brain measures in the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience cohort (www.cam-can.org). We investigated the antagonistic pleiotropy hypothesis by testing for allele-by-age interactions in approximately 600 people across the adult lifespan (18–88 years), on six outcome variables related to cognition, brain structure and brain function (namely, fluid intelligence, verbal memory, hippocampal grey-matter volume, mean diffusion within white matter and resting-state connectivity measured by both functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography). We found no evidence to support the antagonistic pleiotropy hypothesis. Indeed, Bayes factors supported the null hypothesis in all cases, except for the (linear) interaction between age and possession of the ε4 allele on fluid intelligence, for which the evidence for faster decline in older ages was ambiguous. Overall, these pre-registered analyses question the antagonistic pleiotropy of APOE polymorphisms, at least in healthy adults.","PeriodicalId":72444,"journal":{"name":"Brain and neuroscience advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2398212820961704","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and neuroscience advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2398212820961704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Polymorphisms in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene have been associated with individual differences in cognition, brain structure and brain function. For example, the ε4 allele has been associated with cognitive and brain impairment in old age and increased risk of dementia, while the ε2 allele has been claimed to be neuroprotective. According to the ‘antagonistic pleiotropy’ hypothesis, these polymorphisms have different effects across the lifespan, with ε4, for example, postulated to confer benefits on cognitive and brain functions earlier in life. In this stage 2 of the Registered Report – https://osf.io/bufc4, we report the results from the cognitive and brain measures in the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience cohort (www.cam-can.org). We investigated the antagonistic pleiotropy hypothesis by testing for allele-by-age interactions in approximately 600 people across the adult lifespan (18–88 years), on six outcome variables related to cognition, brain structure and brain function (namely, fluid intelligence, verbal memory, hippocampal grey-matter volume, mean diffusion within white matter and resting-state connectivity measured by both functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography). We found no evidence to support the antagonistic pleiotropy hypothesis. Indeed, Bayes factors supported the null hypothesis in all cases, except for the (linear) interaction between age and possession of the ε4 allele on fluid intelligence, for which the evidence for faster decline in older ages was ambiguous. Overall, these pre-registered analyses question the antagonistic pleiotropy of APOE polymorphisms, at least in healthy adults.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
载脂蛋白E多态性对剑桥老化和神经科学中心队列认知和大脑的影响。
载脂蛋白E (APOE)基因的多态性与认知、脑结构和脑功能的个体差异有关。例如,ε4等位基因与老年认知和脑损伤以及痴呆风险增加有关,而ε2等位基因则被认为具有神经保护作用。根据“拮抗多效性”假说,这些多态性在整个生命周期中有不同的影响,例如,ε4被认为在生命早期对认知和大脑功能有好处。在注册报告的第二阶段- https://osf.io/bufc4中,我们报告了剑桥老龄化和神经科学中心队列(www.cam-can.org)的认知和大脑测量结果。我们研究了拮抗多效性假说,在大约600人的成年寿命(18-88岁)中测试了等位基因随年龄的相互作用,测试了与认知、脑结构和脑功能相关的六个结果变量(即,流体智力、言语记忆、海马灰质体积、白质内平均扩散和静息状态连通性,这两种变量均由功能性磁共振成像和脑磁图测量)。我们没有发现证据支持拮抗多效性假说。事实上,贝叶斯因素在所有情况下都支持原假设,除了年龄和拥有ε4等位基因之间的(线性)相互作用对流体智力的影响,其中年龄越大下降越快的证据是模糊的。总的来说,这些预先登记的分析质疑APOE多态性的拮抗多效性,至少在健康成人中是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Not all plaques are created equal: Uncovering a unique molecular signature in Alzheimer's disease. Children aged 5-13 years show adult-like disgust avoidance, but not proto-nausea. Brain mechanisms of temporal processing in impulsivity: Relevance to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Does theta synchronicity of sensory information enhance associative memory? Replicating the theta-induced memory effect. A multimodal approach connecting cortical and behavioural responses to the visual continuity illusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1