Does timeframe adjustment of the Life Orientation Test-Revised assess optimism as a state?: Data from the PEACE-III trial in patients with heart disease.

The Journal of Positive Psychology Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-02-12 DOI:10.1080/17439760.2019.1579355
Jeff C Huffman, Sean Legler, Rachel A Millstein, Federico Gomez-Bernal, Christopher M Celano, Wei-Jean Chung, Brian C Healy
{"title":"Does timeframe adjustment of the Life Orientation Test-Revised assess optimism as a state?: Data from the PEACE-III trial in patients with heart disease.","authors":"Jeff C Huffman,&nbsp;Sean Legler,&nbsp;Rachel A Millstein,&nbsp;Federico Gomez-Bernal,&nbsp;Christopher M Celano,&nbsp;Wei-Jean Chung,&nbsp;Brian C Healy","doi":"10.1080/17439760.2019.1579355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimism is prospectively associated with superior health outcomes in cardiac patients, making it an attractive target for well-being interventions in this population. However, optimism measured by the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) has largely been considered a static, dispositional construct. Among 125 patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome who received a positive psychology intervention, we assessed the properties of a modified LOT-R that changed the timeframe of items from general dispositional statements to queries about 'right now.' We aimed to learn whether this modified LOT-R was more dynamic than the original LOT-R via administration of both instruments at three timepoints over the 16-week study period. Contrary to our hypothesis, this modified LOT-R showed no greater change in mean score or intra-individual variance than the original LOT-R over 16 weeks. This suggests that simply changing the timeframe of the LOT-R may not facilitate assessment of more state-like optimism in medical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":515224,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Positive Psychology","volume":"14 6","pages":"799-806"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17439760.2019.1579355","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Positive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1579355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Optimism is prospectively associated with superior health outcomes in cardiac patients, making it an attractive target for well-being interventions in this population. However, optimism measured by the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) has largely been considered a static, dispositional construct. Among 125 patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome who received a positive psychology intervention, we assessed the properties of a modified LOT-R that changed the timeframe of items from general dispositional statements to queries about 'right now.' We aimed to learn whether this modified LOT-R was more dynamic than the original LOT-R via administration of both instruments at three timepoints over the 16-week study period. Contrary to our hypothesis, this modified LOT-R showed no greater change in mean score or intra-individual variance than the original LOT-R over 16 weeks. This suggests that simply changing the timeframe of the LOT-R may not facilitate assessment of more state-like optimism in medical patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生活取向测试修订后的时间框架调整是否将乐观作为一种状态进行评估?:心脏病患者的PEACE-III试验数据。
乐观预期与心脏病患者的良好健康结果相关,使其成为该人群中健康干预的一个有吸引力的目标。然而,生活取向测试(LOT-R)所测量的乐观主义在很大程度上被认为是一种静态的、性格的结构。在125名近期接受积极心理干预的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,我们评估了一种改进的LOT-R的特性,它将项目的时间范围从一般的性格陈述改为关于“现在”的询问。我们的目的是通过在16周的研究期间的三个时间点给药两种仪器来了解这种改良的LOT-R是否比原始的LOT-R更具活力。与我们的假设相反,这种改进的LOT-R在16周内的平均评分或个体内方差没有比原始LOT-R更大的变化。这表明,简单地改变LOT-R的时间框架可能不会促进对医疗患者更乐观的状态的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The world as I see it: genetic and environmental influences on primal world beliefs in a large Swedish twin sample Implications of daily world beliefs for relationship satisfaction: The role of positive relationship illusions Systems-informed PERMA+4 and psychological safety: predicting work-related well-being and performance across an international sample Engagement with art and meaning in life: the predictive roles of awe, interest, supernatural attributions Gratitude, indebtedness, and God: gratitude and indebtedness to God are more strongly correlated to each other than gratitude and indebtedness to a person or an object
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1