Variations in exercise ventilation in hypoxia will affect oxygen uptake.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Physiology international Pub Date : 2020-10-03 Print Date: 2020-10-17 DOI:10.1556/2060.2020.00031
J A Loeppky, R M Salgado, A C Sheard, D O Kuethe, C M Mermier
{"title":"Variations in exercise ventilation in hypoxia will affect oxygen uptake.","authors":"J A Loeppky,&nbsp;R M Salgado,&nbsp;A C Sheard,&nbsp;D O Kuethe,&nbsp;C M Mermier","doi":"10.1556/2060.2020.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports of VO2 response differences between normoxia and hypoxia during incremental exercise do not agree. In this study VO2 and VE were obtained from 15-s averages at identical work rates during continuous incremental cycle exercise in 8 subjects under ambient pressure (633 mmHg ≈1,600 m) and during duplicate tests in acute hypobaric hypoxia (455 mmHg ≈4,350 m), ranging from 49 to 100% of VO2 peak in hypoxia and 42-87% of VO2 peak in normoxia. The average VO2 was 96 mL/min (619 mL) lower at 455 mmHg (n.s. P = 0.15) during ramp exercises. Individual response points were better described by polynomial than linear equations (mL/min/W). The VE was greater in hypoxia, with marked individual variation in the differences which correlated significantly and directly with the VO2 difference between 455 mmHg and 633 mmHg (P = 0.002), likely related to work of breathing (Wb). The greater VE at 455 mmHg resulted from a greater breathing frequency. When a subject's hypoxic ventilatory response is high, the extra work of breathing reduces mechanical efficiency (E). Mean ∆E calculated from individual linear slopes was 27.7 and 30.3% at 633 and 455 mmHg, respectively (n.s.). Gross efficiency (GE) calculated from mean VO2 and work rate and correcting for Wb from a VE-VO2 relationship reported previously, gave corresponding values of 20.6 and 21.8 (P = 0.05). Individual variation in VE among individuals overshadows average trends, as also apparent from other reports comparing hypoxia and normoxia during progressive exercise and must be considered in such studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20058,"journal":{"name":"Physiology international","volume":"107 3","pages":"431-443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2060.2020.00031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reports of VO2 response differences between normoxia and hypoxia during incremental exercise do not agree. In this study VO2 and VE were obtained from 15-s averages at identical work rates during continuous incremental cycle exercise in 8 subjects under ambient pressure (633 mmHg ≈1,600 m) and during duplicate tests in acute hypobaric hypoxia (455 mmHg ≈4,350 m), ranging from 49 to 100% of VO2 peak in hypoxia and 42-87% of VO2 peak in normoxia. The average VO2 was 96 mL/min (619 mL) lower at 455 mmHg (n.s. P = 0.15) during ramp exercises. Individual response points were better described by polynomial than linear equations (mL/min/W). The VE was greater in hypoxia, with marked individual variation in the differences which correlated significantly and directly with the VO2 difference between 455 mmHg and 633 mmHg (P = 0.002), likely related to work of breathing (Wb). The greater VE at 455 mmHg resulted from a greater breathing frequency. When a subject's hypoxic ventilatory response is high, the extra work of breathing reduces mechanical efficiency (E). Mean ∆E calculated from individual linear slopes was 27.7 and 30.3% at 633 and 455 mmHg, respectively (n.s.). Gross efficiency (GE) calculated from mean VO2 and work rate and correcting for Wb from a VE-VO2 relationship reported previously, gave corresponding values of 20.6 and 21.8 (P = 0.05). Individual variation in VE among individuals overshadows average trends, as also apparent from other reports comparing hypoxia and normoxia during progressive exercise and must be considered in such studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缺氧时运动通气的变化会影响摄氧量。
关于增量运动中常氧和低氧的VO2反应差异的报道并不一致。在本研究中,8名受试者在环境压力(633 mmHg≈1,600 m)和急性低压缺氧(455 mmHg≈4,350 m)的重复测试中,以相同的工作速率连续增量循环运动15秒的平均值获得了VO2和VE,在缺氧时为VO2峰值的49%至100%,在正常缺氧时为VO2峰值的42-87%。在斜坡运动期间,平均VO2在455 mmHg时降低了96 mL/min (619 mL) (n.s P = 0.15)。用多项式比用线性方程(mL/min/W)更好地描述个体反应点。缺氧时VE较大,个体差异显著,与455 mmHg和633 mmHg的VO2差异直接相关(P = 0.002),可能与呼吸功(Wb)有关。455mmhg时,呼吸频率越高,肺活量越大。当受试者缺氧通气反应高时,额外的呼吸功会降低机械效率(E)。在633和455 mmHg时,由单个线性斜率计算的平均∆E分别为27.7和30.3% (n.s)。总效率(GE)由平均VO2和工作速率计算,并根据先前报道的VE-VO2关系校正Wb,相应值为20.6和21.8 (P = 0.05)。个体间VE的个体差异掩盖了平均趋势,其他比较渐进式运动中缺氧和常氧的报告也很明显,这在此类研究中必须加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiology international
Physiology international Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The journal provides a forum for important new research papers written by eminent scientists on experimental medical sciences. Papers reporting on both original work and review articles in the fields of basic and clinical physiology, pathophysiology (from the subcellular organization level up to the oranizmic one), as well as related disciplines, including history of physiological sciences, are accepted.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTION NOTE TO: The effects of sericin in recovering spermatogenesis and sexual hormone levels in diabetic rats. RETRACTION NOTE TO: The effects of sericin in recovering spermatogenesis and sexual hormone levels in diabetic rats. Sesamol protects against LPS-induced inflammation in rat peritoneal macrophages by promoting SIRT1-induced repression of NF-κB. The Hungarian adaptation of the functional status questionnaire: Examination of validity and reliability. Analysis of results of radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1