Supreme Court 2019-2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA-And a Pandemic.

Journal of health service psychology Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-29 DOI:10.1007/s42843-020-00021-2
Steven R Smith
{"title":"Supreme Court 2019-2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA-And a Pandemic.","authors":"Steven R Smith","doi":"10.1007/s42843-020-00021-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2019-2020 Supreme Court session was an extraordinary session. One major ruling involved insanity defense and whether the two prongs of cognitive capacity and moral capacity were required. Sexual identity was ruled to be covered by the Civil Rights Act in relation to employment. Unanimous criminal jury decisions were ruled a required condition for conviction. The rescindment of DACA was overturned on procedural grounds. Other decisions related to conditions of abortion, habitual residence in international custody cases, police immunity from civil liability, guns, HIV, and capital punishment. Thirty-five percent of cases were unanimous (down from the recent average), and 22% were decided by a 5-4 vote (slightly above the recent average).</p>","PeriodicalId":73770,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health service psychology","volume":"46 4","pages":"181-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s42843-020-00021-2","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health service psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42843-020-00021-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The 2019-2020 Supreme Court session was an extraordinary session. One major ruling involved insanity defense and whether the two prongs of cognitive capacity and moral capacity were required. Sexual identity was ruled to be covered by the Civil Rights Act in relation to employment. Unanimous criminal jury decisions were ruled a required condition for conviction. The rescindment of DACA was overturned on procedural grounds. Other decisions related to conditions of abortion, habitual residence in international custody cases, police immunity from civil liability, guns, HIV, and capital punishment. Thirty-five percent of cases were unanimous (down from the recent average), and 22% were decided by a 5-4 vote (slightly above the recent average).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最高法院2019-2020:精神错乱、歧视、daca——以及流行病。
2019-2020年最高法院是一次特别会议。一项主要裁决涉及精神错乱辩护,以及是否需要认知能力和道德能力这两个方面。在与就业有关的问题上,《民权法案》规定了性别认同的范围。一致的刑事陪审团裁决被裁定为定罪的必要条件。DACA的撤销因程序原因被推翻。其他决定涉及堕胎条件、国际拘留案件中的惯常居住地、警察民事责任豁免、枪支、艾滋病毒和死刑。35%的案件获得一致通过(低于最近的平均水平),22%的案件以5比4的投票结果决定(略高于最近的平均水平)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychologists’ Role in Promoting Brain Health Equity in an Aging and Increasingly Diverse Society Integrating Digital Therapeutics With Mental Healthcare Delivery Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Promote Recovery from Pediatric Concussion Beyond Boundaries: Inclusive and Innovative Strategies for Diverse Clientele Advancing Cognitive Health in Aging Populations by Leveraging Digital Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1