Effects of Preexisting Psychotropic Medication Use on a Cohort of Patients with Ischemic Stroke Outcome.

IF 1.8 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Stroke Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2020-09-22 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/9070486
Adalia H Jun-O'Connell, Dilip K Jayaraman, Nils Henninger, Brian Silver, Majaz Moonis, Anthony J Rothschild
{"title":"Effects of Preexisting Psychotropic Medication Use on a Cohort of Patients with Ischemic Stroke Outcome.","authors":"Adalia H Jun-O'Connell, Dilip K Jayaraman, Nils Henninger, Brian Silver, Majaz Moonis, Anthony J Rothschild","doi":"10.1155/2020/9070486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies investigated the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) after ischemic stroke to improve motor recovery. However, little is known about the effects of preexisting psychotropic medication use (PPMU), such as antidepressants, on a long-term ischemic stroke functional disability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to determine the prevalence of PPMU and whether PPMU relates to the long-term clinical outcome in a cohort of patients presenting with acute ischemic strokes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 323 consecutive patients who presented with an acute ischemic stroke in a single institution between January 2015 and December 2017. Baseline characteristics, functional disability as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and major adverse cardiovascular complications (MACE) within 365 days were recorded. The comparison groups included a control group of ischemic stroke patients who were not on psychotropic medications before and after the index ischemic stroke and a second group of poststroke psychotropic medication use (PoMU), which consisted of patients started on psychotropic medication during the index admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of PPMU in the studied cohort was 21.4% (69/323). There was a greater proportion of females in the PPMU than in the comparison groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001), while vascular risk factors were similar in all groups, except for an increased presence of posterior circulation infarcts in the PPMU (37.4% vs. 18.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Among the patients with available 1-year follow-up data (<i>n</i> = 246), we noted significantly greater improvement in stroke deficits, measured by National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) between PPMU and PoMU vs. control (3 (0-7) versus 1 (0-4), <i>P</i> = 0.041). The 1-year mRS was worse in PPMU and PoMU compared to the control group (2 (IQ 1-3) vs. 2 (IQ 0-3) vs. 1 (IQ 0-2), respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.013), but delta mRS reflecting the degree of mRS improvement showed no significant difference between any PMU and control patients (<i>P</i> = 0.76). There was no statistically significant difference in MACE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPMU in ischemic stroke is common; it can be beneficial in ischemic stroke in the long-term clinical outcome and is not associated with increased risks of MACE.</p>","PeriodicalId":22054,"journal":{"name":"Stroke Research and Treatment","volume":"2020 ","pages":"9070486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7528134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9070486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several studies investigated the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) after ischemic stroke to improve motor recovery. However, little is known about the effects of preexisting psychotropic medication use (PPMU), such as antidepressants, on a long-term ischemic stroke functional disability.

Objective: We sought to determine the prevalence of PPMU and whether PPMU relates to the long-term clinical outcome in a cohort of patients presenting with acute ischemic strokes.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 323 consecutive patients who presented with an acute ischemic stroke in a single institution between January 2015 and December 2017. Baseline characteristics, functional disability as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and major adverse cardiovascular complications (MACE) within 365 days were recorded. The comparison groups included a control group of ischemic stroke patients who were not on psychotropic medications before and after the index ischemic stroke and a second group of poststroke psychotropic medication use (PoMU), which consisted of patients started on psychotropic medication during the index admission.

Results: The prevalence of PPMU in the studied cohort was 21.4% (69/323). There was a greater proportion of females in the PPMU than in the comparison groups (P < 0.001), while vascular risk factors were similar in all groups, except for an increased presence of posterior circulation infarcts in the PPMU (37.4% vs. 18.8%, P < 0.001). Among the patients with available 1-year follow-up data (n = 246), we noted significantly greater improvement in stroke deficits, measured by National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) between PPMU and PoMU vs. control (3 (0-7) versus 1 (0-4), P = 0.041). The 1-year mRS was worse in PPMU and PoMU compared to the control group (2 (IQ 1-3) vs. 2 (IQ 0-3) vs. 1 (IQ 0-2), respectively, P = 0.013), but delta mRS reflecting the degree of mRS improvement showed no significant difference between any PMU and control patients (P = 0.76). There was no statistically significant difference in MACE.

Conclusion: PPMU in ischemic stroke is common; it can be beneficial in ischemic stroke in the long-term clinical outcome and is not associated with increased risks of MACE.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原有精神药物使用对缺血性中风患者队列结果的影响
背景:有几项研究调查了缺血性脑卒中后使用选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)改善运动恢复的情况。然而,人们对缺血性脑卒中长期功能障碍之前使用精神药物(PPMU)(如抗抑郁药)的影响知之甚少:我们试图确定急性缺血性脑卒中患者队列中 PPMU 的发生率以及 PPMU 是否与长期临床结果有关:我们回顾性分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月间在一家机构就诊的 323 名急性缺血性脑卒中连续患者。记录了基线特征、改良Rankin量表(mRS)测量的功能障碍以及365天内的主要不良心血管并发症(MACE)。对比组包括在指数缺血性卒中前后未服用精神药物的缺血性卒中患者对照组和卒中后精神药物使用(PoMU)第二组,后者包括在指数入院期间开始服用精神药物的患者:研究队列中 PPMU 的发病率为 21.4%(69/323)。与对比组相比,PPMU 组中女性比例更高(P < 0.001),而所有组别中的血管风险因素相似,只是 PPMU 组中后循环梗死的发生率更高(37.4% 对 18.8%,P < 0.001)。在有 1 年随访数据的患者(n = 246)中,我们注意到,根据美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)测量,PPMU 和 PoMU 与对照组相比,卒中缺损的改善程度明显更高(3 (0-7) 对 1 (0-4),P = 0.041)。与对照组相比,PPMU 和 PoMU 的 1 年 mRS 更差(分别为 2(IQ 1-3 )对 2(IQ 0-3 )对 1(IQ 0-2),P = 0.013),但反映 mRS 改善程度的 delta mRS 在任何 PMU 和对照组患者之间均无显著差异(P = 0.76)。结论:PPMU在缺血性脑卒中患者中的应用具有重要意义:结论:PPMU 在缺血性脑卒中中很常见;它对缺血性脑卒中的长期临床预后有益,且与 MACE 风险的增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke Research and Treatment
Stroke Research and Treatment PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Action Observation of the Whole Task Influence Mirror Neuron System and Upper Limb Muscle Activity Better Than Part Task in People With Stroke? Evaluation of Contralateral Limb Cross Education and High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Functional Indices of the Affected Upper Limb in Subacute Phase of Stroke External Validation of SAFE Score to Predict Atrial Fibrillation Diagnosis after Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Multicenter Study Modeling Survival Time to Death among Stroke Patients at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Effect of Self-Directed Home Therapy Adherence Combined with TheraBracelet on Poststroke Hand Recovery: A Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1