The role of UGT1A1 (c.-3279 T > G) gene polymorphisms in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia susceptibility.

4区 医学 Q4 Medicine BMC Medical Genetics Pub Date : 2020-11-06 DOI:10.1186/s12881-020-01155-2
Zijin Li, Li Song, Lihong Hao
{"title":"The role of UGT1A1 (c.-3279 T > G) gene polymorphisms in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia susceptibility.","authors":"Zijin Li,&nbsp;Li Song,&nbsp;Lihong Hao","doi":"10.1186/s12881-020-01155-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (NNH) is a common disease in newborns. This research study aimed to assess the associations between uridine diphospho-glucuronate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1, c.-3279 T > G) polymorphisms and NNH risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Embase electronic databases. All published eligible studies before July 1, 2019, were searched for this meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 7 independent studies including 1560 cases. The data showed that in the general population, compared with the GT + GG vs TT and GG vs TT, c.-3279 T > G (rs4124874) was significantly related to a higher NNH risk (GG vs TT: OR = 1.865, 95% CI: 1.031-3.373, P = 0.039; GT + GG vs TT: OR = 1.331, 95% CI: 1.055-1.679, P = 0.016). Although not statistically significant, the data showed that c.3279 T > G had a tendency to be associated with NNH under the allele model and GG vs GT + TT in the overall population (G vs T: OR = 1.288, 95% CI: 0.982-1.689, P = 0.067; GG vs TT + GT: OR = 1.583, 95% CI: 0.947-2.647, P = 0.080).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The UGT1A1 gene c.-3279 T > G (rs4124874) polymorphism increased susceptibility to NNH, especially for the comparison of GT + GG vs TT and GG vs TT. In the future, we can use homozygous state of the UGT1A1 gene c.-3279 T > G (rs4124874) polymorphism for the diagnosis and screening of molecular biomarkers in NNH patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9015,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12881-020-01155-2","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-020-01155-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (NNH) is a common disease in newborns. This research study aimed to assess the associations between uridine diphospho-glucuronate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1, c.-3279 T > G) polymorphisms and NNH risk.

Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Embase electronic databases. All published eligible studies before July 1, 2019, were searched for this meta-analysis.

Results: We identified 7 independent studies including 1560 cases. The data showed that in the general population, compared with the GT + GG vs TT and GG vs TT, c.-3279 T > G (rs4124874) was significantly related to a higher NNH risk (GG vs TT: OR = 1.865, 95% CI: 1.031-3.373, P = 0.039; GT + GG vs TT: OR = 1.331, 95% CI: 1.055-1.679, P = 0.016). Although not statistically significant, the data showed that c.3279 T > G had a tendency to be associated with NNH under the allele model and GG vs GT + TT in the overall population (G vs T: OR = 1.288, 95% CI: 0.982-1.689, P = 0.067; GG vs TT + GT: OR = 1.583, 95% CI: 0.947-2.647, P = 0.080).

Conclusion: The UGT1A1 gene c.-3279 T > G (rs4124874) polymorphism increased susceptibility to NNH, especially for the comparison of GT + GG vs TT and GG vs TT. In the future, we can use homozygous state of the UGT1A1 gene c.-3279 T > G (rs4124874) polymorphism for the diagnosis and screening of molecular biomarkers in NNH patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
UGT1A1 (c -3279 T > G)基因多态性在新生儿高胆红素血症易感性中的作用
背景:新生儿高胆红素血症(NNH)是新生儿常见病。本研究旨在评估尿苷二磷酸-葡萄糖醛酸-葡萄糖醛酸基转移酶1A1 (UGT1A1, c -3279 T > G)多态性与NNH风险之间的关系。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase电子数据库。本荟萃分析检索了2019年7月1日之前发表的所有符合条件的研究。结果:我们纳入了7项独立研究,包括1560例病例。数据显示,在一般人群中,与GT + GG vs TT和GG vs TT相比,c -3279 T > G (rs4124874)与NNH风险升高显著相关(GG vs TT: OR = 1.865, 95% CI: 1.031-3.373, P = 0.039;GT + GG vs TT: = 1.331, 95%置信区间CI: 1.055 - -1.679, P = 0.016)。虽然没有统计学意义,但数据显示,在等位基因模型下,c.3279 T > G倾向于与NNH相关,总体上GG vs GT + TT倾向于与NNH相关(G vs T: OR = 1.288, 95% CI: 0.982 ~ 1.689, P = 0.067;GG vs TT + GT: = 1.583, 95%置信区间CI: 0.947 - -2.647, P = 0.080)。结论:UGT1A1基因c -3279 T > G (rs4124874)多态性增加了NNH的易感性,特别是GT + GG vs TT和GG vs TT的比较。未来,我们可以利用UGT1A1基因c -3279 T > G (rs4124874)多态性的纯合状态进行NNH患者分子生物标志物的诊断和筛选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Genetics
BMC Medical Genetics 医学-遗传学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Genetics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the effects of genetic variation in individuals, families and among populations in relation to human health and disease. Note: BMC Medical Genetics is now closed. This journal has merged with BMC Medical Genomics, a broad-scope, open access community journal for all medical genetics and genomics research.
期刊最新文献
Retraction Note: lncRNA TINCR sponges miR-214-5p to upregulate ROCK1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. A non-synonymous variant rs12614 of complement factor B associated with risk of chronic hepatitis B in a Korean population. Application of next generation sequencing in genetic counseling a case of a couple at risk of cystinosis. DGAT1 mutations leading to delayed chronic diarrhoea: a case report. Case report: progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 with compound heterozygous ABCB4 variants diagnosed 15 years after liver transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1