Failure of Nonoperative Management following Angioembolization for Blunt Splenic and Pancreatic Tail Injury.

Case Reports in Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2020-10-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/8863885
Kazuhiro Nishida, Tadao Kubota
{"title":"Failure of Nonoperative Management following Angioembolization for Blunt Splenic and Pancreatic Tail Injury.","authors":"Kazuhiro Nishida,&nbsp;Tadao Kubota","doi":"10.1155/2020/8863885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over several decades, standard management of blunt spleen injury (BSI) has been changed from operative intervention to the selective operative and nonoperative management (NOM). However, some patient needs laparotomy first. This article describes a case of a BSI patient who failed nonoperative management after angioembolization (AE). <i>Case Presentation</i>. A 58-year-old man fell from his motorcycle and was brought to our hospital. His vital sign was stable after extracellular fluid bolus. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen showed AAST grade V spleen injury. AE was performed for the splenic artery, but his systolic blood pressure suddenly dropped under 60 mmHg. The resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta was inserted, and immediate laparotomy was performed. A pancreatic tail injury was detected, and the splenic artery and vein were burst at the pancreatic tail and controlled by hemostatic suture. After splenectomy, a drain was placed at the pancreatic tail and the abdomen was temporally closed. The postoperative course was not remarkable except for abdominal abscess treated with antibiotics, and he was discharged on foot.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although NOM is becoming one of the choices for severe BSI, there will still be a patient who requires surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the mechanism of injury and the limitation of AE as an adjunct to NOM. Patient selection for initial NOM and timing to convert to laparotomy are important.</p>","PeriodicalId":9624,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/8863885","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8863885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over several decades, standard management of blunt spleen injury (BSI) has been changed from operative intervention to the selective operative and nonoperative management (NOM). However, some patient needs laparotomy first. This article describes a case of a BSI patient who failed nonoperative management after angioembolization (AE). Case Presentation. A 58-year-old man fell from his motorcycle and was brought to our hospital. His vital sign was stable after extracellular fluid bolus. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen showed AAST grade V spleen injury. AE was performed for the splenic artery, but his systolic blood pressure suddenly dropped under 60 mmHg. The resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta was inserted, and immediate laparotomy was performed. A pancreatic tail injury was detected, and the splenic artery and vein were burst at the pancreatic tail and controlled by hemostatic suture. After splenectomy, a drain was placed at the pancreatic tail and the abdomen was temporally closed. The postoperative course was not remarkable except for abdominal abscess treated with antibiotics, and he was discharged on foot.

Conclusion: Although NOM is becoming one of the choices for severe BSI, there will still be a patient who requires surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the mechanism of injury and the limitation of AE as an adjunct to NOM. Patient selection for initial NOM and timing to convert to laparotomy are important.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钝性脾胰尾损伤血管栓塞后非手术治疗的失败。
背景:几十年来,钝性脾损伤(BSI)的标准治疗已经从手术干预转变为选择性手术和非手术治疗(NOM)。然而,有些病人需要先剖腹手术。本文描述了一例BSI患者在血管栓塞(AE)后非手术治疗失败的病例。案例演示。一名58岁男子从他的摩托车上摔下来,被送到我们医院。注射细胞外液后生命体征稳定。腹部增强计算机断层扫描显示AAST V级脾脏损伤。对脾动脉行AE,患者收缩压突然降至60mmhg以下。复苏血管内球囊阻塞主动脉,立即开腹手术。胰尾损伤,胰尾脾动静脉破裂,止血缝合控制。脾切除术后,胰尾放置引流管并暂时关闭腹部。术后除腹部脓肿用抗生素治疗外,病程无明显变化,步行出院。结论:尽管NOM正在成为严重BSI的选择之一,但仍有患者需要手术治疗。外科医生应该意识到损伤机制和AE作为NOM辅助手段的局限性。初始NOM的患者选择和转为剖腹手术的时机是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous Extensive Type A Aortic Dissection in an Older Female with No Risk Factors: A Rare Clinical Presentation. HHV-6 Meningoencephalitis in a Healthy Adult Female. Diagnosing Cellulitis of the Penis with Point-of-Care Ultrasonography in a Resource-Limited Setting. Digoxin for the Management of Unstable Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia in a Patient Who Refused Electrical Cardioversion in a Rural Hospital. Large Thrombus Entrapped in a Patent Foramen Ovale during Inferior Vena Cava Filter Protection for Venous Thromboembolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1