Variation in racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 mortality by age in the United States: A cross-sectional study.

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2020-10-20 eCollection Date: 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003402
Mary T Bassett, Jarvis T Chen, Nancy Krieger
{"title":"Variation in racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 mortality by age in the United States: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Mary T Bassett,&nbsp;Jarvis T Chen,&nbsp;Nancy Krieger","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1003402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native (NHAIAN) populations experience excess COVID-19 mortality, compared to the non-Hispanic White (NHW) population, but racial/ethnic differences in age at death are not known. The release of national COVID-19 death data by racial/ethnic group now permits analysis of age-specific mortality rates for these groups and the non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander (NHAPI) population. Our objectives were to examine variation in age-specific COVID-19 mortality rates by racial/ethnicity and to calculate the impact of this mortality using years of potential life lost (YPLL).</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>This cross-sectional study used the recently publicly available data on US COVID-19 deaths with reported race/ethnicity, for the time period February 1, 2020, to July 22, 2020. Population data were drawn from the US Census. As of July 22, 2020, the number of COVID-19 deaths equaled 68,377 for NHW, 29,476 for NHB, 23,256 for Hispanic, 1,143 for NHAIAN, and 6,468 for NHAPI populations; the corresponding population sizes were 186.4 million, 40.6 million, 2.6 million, 19.5 million, and 57.7 million. Age-standardized rate ratios relative to NHW were 3.6 (95% CI 3.5, 3.8; p < 0.001) for NHB, 2.8 (95% CI 2.7, 3.0; p < 0.001) for Hispanic, 2.2 (95% CI 1.8, 2.6; p < 0.001) for NHAIAN, and 1.6 (95% CI 1.4, 1.7; p < 0.001) for NHAP populations. By contrast, NHB rate ratios relative to NHW were 7.1 (95% CI 5.8, 8.7; p < 0.001) for persons aged 25-34 years, 9.0 (95% CI 7.9, 10.2; p < 0.001) for persons aged 35-44 years, and 7.4 (95% CI 6.9, 7.9; p < 0.001) for persons aged 45-54 years. Even at older ages, NHB rate ratios were between 2.0 and 5.7. Similarly, rate ratios for the Hispanic versus NHW population were 7.0 (95% CI 5.8, 8.7; p < 0.001), 8.8 (95% CI 7.8, 9.9; p < 0.001), and 7.0 (95% CI 6.6, 7.5; p < 0.001) for the corresponding age strata above, with remaining rate ratios ranging from 1.4 to 5.0. Rate ratios for NHAIAN were similarly high through age 74 years. Among NHAPI persons, rate ratios ranged from 2.0 to 2.8 for persons aged 25-74 years and were 1.6 and 1.2 for persons aged 75-84 and 85+ years, respectively. As a consequence, more YPLL before age 65 were experienced by the NHB and Hispanic populations than the NHW population-despite the fact that the NHW population is larger-with a ratio of 4.6:1 and 3.2:1, respectively, for NHB and Hispanic persons. Study limitations include likely lag time in receipt of completed death certificates received by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for transmission to NCHS, with consequent lag in capturing the total number of deaths compared to data reported on state dashboards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we observed racial variation in age-specific mortality rates not fully captured with examination of age-standardized rates alone. These findings suggest the importance of examining age-specific mortality rates and underscores how age standardization can obscure extreme variations within age strata. To avoid overlooking such variation, data that permit age-specific analyses should be routinely publicly available.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1003402"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7575091/pdf/","citationCount":"214","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 214

Abstract

Background: In the United States, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native (NHAIAN) populations experience excess COVID-19 mortality, compared to the non-Hispanic White (NHW) population, but racial/ethnic differences in age at death are not known. The release of national COVID-19 death data by racial/ethnic group now permits analysis of age-specific mortality rates for these groups and the non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander (NHAPI) population. Our objectives were to examine variation in age-specific COVID-19 mortality rates by racial/ethnicity and to calculate the impact of this mortality using years of potential life lost (YPLL).

Methods and findings: This cross-sectional study used the recently publicly available data on US COVID-19 deaths with reported race/ethnicity, for the time period February 1, 2020, to July 22, 2020. Population data were drawn from the US Census. As of July 22, 2020, the number of COVID-19 deaths equaled 68,377 for NHW, 29,476 for NHB, 23,256 for Hispanic, 1,143 for NHAIAN, and 6,468 for NHAPI populations; the corresponding population sizes were 186.4 million, 40.6 million, 2.6 million, 19.5 million, and 57.7 million. Age-standardized rate ratios relative to NHW were 3.6 (95% CI 3.5, 3.8; p < 0.001) for NHB, 2.8 (95% CI 2.7, 3.0; p < 0.001) for Hispanic, 2.2 (95% CI 1.8, 2.6; p < 0.001) for NHAIAN, and 1.6 (95% CI 1.4, 1.7; p < 0.001) for NHAP populations. By contrast, NHB rate ratios relative to NHW were 7.1 (95% CI 5.8, 8.7; p < 0.001) for persons aged 25-34 years, 9.0 (95% CI 7.9, 10.2; p < 0.001) for persons aged 35-44 years, and 7.4 (95% CI 6.9, 7.9; p < 0.001) for persons aged 45-54 years. Even at older ages, NHB rate ratios were between 2.0 and 5.7. Similarly, rate ratios for the Hispanic versus NHW population were 7.0 (95% CI 5.8, 8.7; p < 0.001), 8.8 (95% CI 7.8, 9.9; p < 0.001), and 7.0 (95% CI 6.6, 7.5; p < 0.001) for the corresponding age strata above, with remaining rate ratios ranging from 1.4 to 5.0. Rate ratios for NHAIAN were similarly high through age 74 years. Among NHAPI persons, rate ratios ranged from 2.0 to 2.8 for persons aged 25-74 years and were 1.6 and 1.2 for persons aged 75-84 and 85+ years, respectively. As a consequence, more YPLL before age 65 were experienced by the NHB and Hispanic populations than the NHW population-despite the fact that the NHW population is larger-with a ratio of 4.6:1 and 3.2:1, respectively, for NHB and Hispanic persons. Study limitations include likely lag time in receipt of completed death certificates received by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for transmission to NCHS, with consequent lag in capturing the total number of deaths compared to data reported on state dashboards.

Conclusions: In this study, we observed racial variation in age-specific mortality rates not fully captured with examination of age-standardized rates alone. These findings suggest the importance of examining age-specific mortality rates and underscores how age standardization can obscure extreme variations within age strata. To avoid overlooking such variation, data that permit age-specific analyses should be routinely publicly available.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国按年龄划分的COVID-19死亡率的种族/民族差异差异:一项横断面研究
背景:在美国,与非西班牙裔白人(NHW)相比,非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)、西班牙裔和非西班牙裔美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(NHAIAN)人群的COVID-19死亡率高于非西班牙裔白人(NHW),但死亡年龄的种族/民族差异尚不清楚。按种族/族裔群体发布的全国COVID-19死亡数据现在允许分析这些群体和非西班牙裔亚裔或太平洋岛民(NHAPI)人口的特定年龄死亡率。我们的目标是按种族/民族检查年龄特异性COVID-19死亡率的变化,并使用潜在生命损失年数(YPLL)计算这种死亡率的影响。方法和研究结果:本横断面研究使用了最近公开获得的关于美国2019冠状病毒病死率的数据,其中包括2020年2月1日至2020年7月22日期间报告的种族/民族。人口数据来自美国人口普查。截至2020年7月22日,新冠肺炎死亡人数为NHW 68377人,NHB 29476人,西班牙裔23256人,NHAIAN 1143人,NHAPI 6468人;相应的人口规模分别为1.864亿、4060万、260万、1950万、5770万。与NHW相关的年龄标准化比率为3.6 (95% CI 3.5, 3.8;p < 0.001),为2.8 (95% CI 2.7, 3.0;p < 0.001),西班牙裔为2.2 (95% CI 1.8, 2.6;p < 0.001),为1.6 (95% CI 1.4, 1.7;p < 0.001)。相比之下,NHB率相对于NHW为7.1 (95% CI 5.8, 8.7;p < 0.001), 25-34岁的患者为9.0 (95% CI 7.9, 10.2;p < 0.001)和7.4 (95% CI 6.9, 7.9;P < 0.001)。即使在老年人中,NHB比率也在2.0到5.7之间。同样,西班牙裔与非西班牙裔人群的发病率比为7.0 (95% CI 5.8, 8.7;p < 0.001), 8.8 (95% CI 7.8, 9.9;p < 0.001), 7.0 (95% CI 6.6, 7.5;P < 0.001),剩余比率为1.4 ~ 5.0。NHAIAN的发病率在74岁之前也同样高。在NHAPI人群中,25-74岁人群的比率为2.0 - 2.8,75-84岁和85岁以上人群的比率分别为1.6和1.2。因此,尽管NHW人口更大,但NHB和西班牙裔人口在65岁之前经历的YPLL比NHW人口多,NHB和西班牙裔人口的比例分别为4.6:1和3.2:1。研究的局限性包括,在接收疾病控制和预防中心收到的完整死亡证明并将其传递给国家卫生服务中心时,可能存在滞后时间,因此与各州仪表板上报告的数据相比,在获取死亡总数方面存在滞后。结论:在本研究中,我们观察到年龄特异性死亡率的种族差异,仅通过年龄标准化率的检查无法完全捕获。这些发现表明了检查特定年龄死亡率的重要性,并强调了年龄标准化如何掩盖年龄层内的极端变化。为了避免忽视这种差异,允许特定年龄分析的数据应该定期公开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
期刊最新文献
Correction: How can middle-income countries successfully transition away from international health aid? Estimating population immunity against serotype-two poliomyelitis from the inactivated polio vaccine in routine immunization across 112 countries: A modelling study. Association between COVID-19 vaccination and sudden death in apparently healthy younger individuals: A population-based case-control study. Circulating gut microbial metabolites and risk of coronary heart disease: A prospective multi-stage metabolomics study. Living to our full potential: Reassessing global sex inequalities in life expectancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1