Ultrasound assessment of postplacental copper intrauterine device position 6 months after placement during cesarean delivery

Q2 Medicine Contraception: X Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2020.100040
Elizabeth P. Gurney , Arden McAllister, Britt Lang, Courtney A. Schreiber, Sarita Sonalkar
{"title":"Ultrasound assessment of postplacental copper intrauterine device position 6 months after placement during cesarean delivery","authors":"Elizabeth P. Gurney ,&nbsp;Arden McAllister,&nbsp;Britt Lang,&nbsp;Courtney A. Schreiber,&nbsp;Sarita Sonalkar","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective was to describe the sonographic position of copper intrauterine devices (IUDs) 6 months after insertion during cesarean delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This prospective, observational study followed participants who received a copper IUD during cesarean delivery. We performed pelvic examination at 6 weeks and 6 months and sonography at 6 months to determine IUD position. Patients had additional examinations as needed to address complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-nine participants provided outcomes through 6 months: 41 (59%) had correctly positioned IUDs, 21 (30%) had malpositioned intrauterine IUDs, 5 experienced expulsion (3 partial, 2 complete), and 2 had elective removal; 52 (75%) had missing strings. Missing strings at 6 weeks predicted an incorrect IUD position in 22 of 52 participants (positive predictive value 42%), and visible or palpable strings predicted a correct IUD position in 7 of 12 participants (negative predictive value 58%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although 59% of copper IUDs placed during cesarean were correctly positioned at 6 months, nearly one third were malpositioned.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Ultrasound may be indicated for patients receiving a copper IUD during cesarean delivery as checking IUD strings alone does not assure correct placement. Providers offering postpartum IUDs should ensure that appropriate processes for the evaluation and management of devices with missing strings or abnormal position are available to all patients regardless of insurance status.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100040"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100040","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259015162030023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective

The objective was to describe the sonographic position of copper intrauterine devices (IUDs) 6 months after insertion during cesarean delivery.

Study design

This prospective, observational study followed participants who received a copper IUD during cesarean delivery. We performed pelvic examination at 6 weeks and 6 months and sonography at 6 months to determine IUD position. Patients had additional examinations as needed to address complications.

Results

Sixty-nine participants provided outcomes through 6 months: 41 (59%) had correctly positioned IUDs, 21 (30%) had malpositioned intrauterine IUDs, 5 experienced expulsion (3 partial, 2 complete), and 2 had elective removal; 52 (75%) had missing strings. Missing strings at 6 weeks predicted an incorrect IUD position in 22 of 52 participants (positive predictive value 42%), and visible or palpable strings predicted a correct IUD position in 7 of 12 participants (negative predictive value 58%).

Conclusion

Although 59% of copper IUDs placed during cesarean were correctly positioned at 6 months, nearly one third were malpositioned.

Implications

Ultrasound may be indicated for patients receiving a copper IUD during cesarean delivery as checking IUD strings alone does not assure correct placement. Providers offering postpartum IUDs should ensure that appropriate processes for the evaluation and management of devices with missing strings or abnormal position are available to all patients regardless of insurance status.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖宫产中放置铜质宫内节育器6个月后位置的超声评估
目的探讨剖宫产术中铜质宫内节育器置入6个月后的超声位置。研究设计:这项前瞻性观察性研究随访了剖宫产期间接受铜宫内节育器的参与者。在6 周和6 个月时进行盆腔检查,6 个月时进行超声检查以确定宫内节育器的位置。根据需要对患者进行额外检查以解决并发症。结果69名参与者提供了6个月的结果:41人(59%)放置了正确的宫内节育器,21人(30%)放置了错误的宫内节育器,5人被排出(3人部分排出,2人完全排出),2人选择性取出;52个(75%)缺少字符串。在52名参与者中,6周时缺失的字符串预测了22个不正确的宫内节育器位置(阳性预测值为42%),在12名参与者中,可见或可触及的字符串预测了7个正确的宫内节育器位置(阴性预测值为58%)。结论剖宫产术中放置的铜宫内节育器在6 个月时定位正确的占59%,但有近1 / 3放置错误。意义在剖宫产过程中接受铜宫内节育器的患者可能需要超声检查,因为仅检查宫内节育器串并不能保证正确放置。提供产后宫内节育器的提供者应确保所有患者都能获得适当的评估和管理程序,无论其保险状况如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Outpatient medical management of later second trimester abortion (18–23.6 weeks) with procedural evacuation backup: A large case series Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use How does person-centered maternity care relate to postpartum contraceptive counseling and use? Evidence from a longitudinal study of women delivering at health facilities in Ethiopia Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15–24 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1