A Survey on Prevalence and Knowledge of Family Planning among Women of Childbearing Age in the Provincial Settings of the Gambia: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.

Advances in Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2020-11-05 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/8862290
Amadou Barrow
{"title":"A Survey on Prevalence and Knowledge of Family Planning among Women of Childbearing Age in the Provincial Settings of the Gambia: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Amadou Barrow","doi":"10.1155/2020/8862290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family planning (FP) is one of the fundamental pillars of safe motherhood and reproductive health rights. In developing countries, women with unmet need for FP constitute a significant proportion of all women of reproductive age and it is an ongoing public health challenge in the Gambia. The study aimed to determine the women's proportion of contraceptive uptake and knowledge of FP methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a community-based descriptive cross-sectional study conducted for 643 women of reproductive age (15-49 years) from the selected clusters in rural Gambia through a multistage sampling technique. A pretested structured interview questionnaire was used to collect data. Univariate analysis using frequencies and percentages were used to present results in this study. Data entry and analysis were done using IBM SPSS version 24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall contraceptive prevalence rate was 30.4%, while the CPR for married or in the union was 34.2%. About 86% of women reported child spacing as the major benefits of FP, while 49.5% reported amenorrhea as the most common side effect of contraceptives. Injectable (Depo-Provera, Noristerat, and ) and pills (progesterone and combined) were the two most common FP methods used at 58.5% and 44.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study showed a moderately low contraceptive uptake. Thus, there is a need to focus FP services for women in rural areas, emphasizing the quality of services and gender equality. The study further recommends strengthening and mainstreaming of male involvement and religious leaders participation in FP interventions and the initiation of a communication program that explicitly promotes interspousal communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":7388,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Preventive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/8862290","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8862290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: Family planning (FP) is one of the fundamental pillars of safe motherhood and reproductive health rights. In developing countries, women with unmet need for FP constitute a significant proportion of all women of reproductive age and it is an ongoing public health challenge in the Gambia. The study aimed to determine the women's proportion of contraceptive uptake and knowledge of FP methods.

Methods: The study employed a community-based descriptive cross-sectional study conducted for 643 women of reproductive age (15-49 years) from the selected clusters in rural Gambia through a multistage sampling technique. A pretested structured interview questionnaire was used to collect data. Univariate analysis using frequencies and percentages were used to present results in this study. Data entry and analysis were done using IBM SPSS version 24.

Results: The overall contraceptive prevalence rate was 30.4%, while the CPR for married or in the union was 34.2%. About 86% of women reported child spacing as the major benefits of FP, while 49.5% reported amenorrhea as the most common side effect of contraceptives. Injectable (Depo-Provera, Noristerat, and ) and pills (progesterone and combined) were the two most common FP methods used at 58.5% and 44.0%, respectively.

Conclusion: The present study showed a moderately low contraceptive uptake. Thus, there is a need to focus FP services for women in rural areas, emphasizing the quality of services and gender equality. The study further recommends strengthening and mainstreaming of male involvement and religious leaders participation in FP interventions and the initiation of a communication program that explicitly promotes interspousal communication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冈比亚省育龄妇女计划生育知识和普及情况调查:一项描述性横断面研究。
背景:计划生育是安全孕产和生殖健康权利的基本支柱之一。在发展中国家,计划生育需求未得到满足的妇女占所有育龄妇女的很大比例,这是冈比亚持续面临的公共卫生挑战。该研究旨在确定妇女避孕的摄取比例和计划生育方法的知识。方法:该研究采用基于社区的描述性横断面研究,通过多阶段抽样技术,从冈比亚农村选定的集群中对643名育龄妇女(15-49岁)进行研究。采用预先测试的结构化访谈问卷收集数据。使用频率和百分比的单变量分析来呈现本研究的结果。使用IBM SPSS version 24进行数据录入和分析。结果:总体避孕普及率为30.4%,已婚或同居者CPR普及率为34.2%。大约86%的妇女报告生育间隔是计划生育的主要好处,而49.5%的妇女报告闭经是避孕药最常见的副作用。注射(Depo-Provera, Noristerat,和)和片剂(孕酮和联合用药)是两种最常见的计划生育方法,分别占58.5%和44.0%。结论:本研究显示了适度低的避孕药摄取。因此,有必要着重为农村地区妇女提供计划生育服务,强调服务质量和性别平等。该研究进一步建议加强男性参与和宗教领袖参与计划生育干预并将其纳入主流,并启动一项明确促进配偶间沟通的沟通计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Factors Associated with Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in an Ethiopian Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Financial Losses Arising from Cattle Organ and Carcass Condemnation at Lokoloko Abattoir in Wau, South Sudan. Clinical and Histopathological Factors Associated with the Tumoral Expression of TGF-β1, MED15, CD16, and CD57 in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Prevalence of Caries among School Children in Saudi Arabia: A Meta-Analysis. Effectiveness of a Community Health Worker-Led Intervention on Knowledge, Perception, and Prostate Cancer Screening among Men in Rural Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1