Comparison of the importance and observance of the patient's bill of rights from the perspectives of patients and personnel of hospitals in Kerman.

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICAL ETHICS Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Pub Date : 2020-06-02 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.18502/jmehm.v13i5.4070
Mahlagha Dehghan, Roghayeh Mehdipour-Rabori, Masoud Rayani, Mohammad Ali Zakeri, Mina Mobasher, Maryam Iranmanesh, Narges Rezai
{"title":"Comparison of the importance and observance of the patient's bill of rights from the perspectives of patients and personnel of hospitals in Kerman.","authors":"Mahlagha Dehghan,&nbsp;Roghayeh Mehdipour-Rabori,&nbsp;Masoud Rayani,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Zakeri,&nbsp;Mina Mobasher,&nbsp;Maryam Iranmanesh,&nbsp;Narges Rezai","doi":"10.18502/jmehm.v13i5.4070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients' rights are among the most important criteria for evaluating the quality of health services. The current study aimed to determine the importance and observance of the patient's bill of rights. This cross-sectional study was done in Kerman, Iran. The research samples were 217 patients and 204 personnel. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire in the scope of the patient's bill of rights, and data were analyzed by SPSS 15. The results showed a significant difference between patients and the personnel on the subject of the patient's bill of rights and most of its dimensions (<i>P</i> < 0.01). However, no significant difference was found between their views on the observance of the patient's bill of rights and its dimensions. Also, 35.9% of patients as well as 25% of personnel considered the observance of patients' rights unfavorable. The participants were aware of the importance of the patient's bill of rights. It is necessary, however, to codify and approve the laws related to the rights of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45276,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","volume":"13 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7575912/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v13i5.4070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Patients' rights are among the most important criteria for evaluating the quality of health services. The current study aimed to determine the importance and observance of the patient's bill of rights. This cross-sectional study was done in Kerman, Iran. The research samples were 217 patients and 204 personnel. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire in the scope of the patient's bill of rights, and data were analyzed by SPSS 15. The results showed a significant difference between patients and the personnel on the subject of the patient's bill of rights and most of its dimensions (P < 0.01). However, no significant difference was found between their views on the observance of the patient's bill of rights and its dimensions. Also, 35.9% of patients as well as 25% of personnel considered the observance of patients' rights unfavorable. The participants were aware of the importance of the patient's bill of rights. It is necessary, however, to codify and approve the laws related to the rights of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从克尔曼医院患者和医务人员的角度比较患者权利法案的重要性和遵守情况。
病人的权利是评价保健服务质量的最重要标准之一。目前的研究旨在确定患者权利法案的重要性和遵守情况。这个横断面研究是在伊朗的克尔曼完成的。研究样本为217名患者和204名工作人员。数据收集工具为患者权利法案范围内研究者自行制作的问卷,数据采用SPSS 15进行分析。结果显示,患者与医务人员在患者权利法案主体及其大部分维度上存在显著差异(P < 0.01)。然而,他们对遵守病人权利法案及其维度的看法并无显著差异。此外,35.9%的患者和25%的工作人员认为对患者权利的尊重是不利的。与会者意识到病人权利法案的重要性。但是,有必要编纂和批准与患者权利有关的法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Navigating ethical dilemmas in complementary and alternative medicine: a narrative review. The criterion of human dignity in the Quran. How can physicians' professional reputation be damaged? Patients', nurses' and physicians' viewpoints. Ethical issues experienced by otolaryngologists: a conventional content analysis. Evaluation of medical sciences students' awareness of the patients' rights charter: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1