Body Politics in the COVID-19 Era from a Feminist Lens.

Emilia Reyes
{"title":"Body Politics in the COVID-19 Era from a Feminist Lens.","authors":"Emilia Reyes","doi":"10.1057/s41301-020-00266-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The premises of the feminist economist tradition from the Global South center their analysis in the wellbeing of people and the planet, under the human rights framework, gender equality and environmental integrity, as cross-cutting principles. The pandemic brought to the surface what the feminist movement has been saying all along, namely that the wellbeing of persons, and the planet they live in, depends on a complex web of elements beyond a limited notion of bodily health. The current capitalistic system has always kindled a tension between life and profits, a game that has undermined human rights of all persons by prioritizing the circulation of merchandises, goods and capitals. That struggle is more acutely felt now with the confinement measures imposed all around the world, and the ensuing impossibility for millions of people in precarious circumstances of respecting the lockdown measures. Women are even more carrying the burden of subsidizing entire economies. The feminist movement is now looking at solutions of solidarity at the crossroad between and within social movements, public policy, local and community resistance, while refusing to go back to a world where women may have to subsidize even more entire economies under recession.</p>","PeriodicalId":72792,"journal":{"name":"Development (Society for International Development)","volume":"63 2-4","pages":"262-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1057/s41301-020-00266-w","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development (Society for International Development)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-020-00266-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The premises of the feminist economist tradition from the Global South center their analysis in the wellbeing of people and the planet, under the human rights framework, gender equality and environmental integrity, as cross-cutting principles. The pandemic brought to the surface what the feminist movement has been saying all along, namely that the wellbeing of persons, and the planet they live in, depends on a complex web of elements beyond a limited notion of bodily health. The current capitalistic system has always kindled a tension between life and profits, a game that has undermined human rights of all persons by prioritizing the circulation of merchandises, goods and capitals. That struggle is more acutely felt now with the confinement measures imposed all around the world, and the ensuing impossibility for millions of people in precarious circumstances of respecting the lockdown measures. Women are even more carrying the burden of subsidizing entire economies. The feminist movement is now looking at solutions of solidarity at the crossroad between and within social movements, public policy, local and community resistance, while refusing to go back to a world where women may have to subsidize even more entire economies under recession.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女权主义视角下的新冠肺炎时代的身体政治
来自全球南方的女权主义经济学家传统的前提是,在人权框架下,将人类和地球的福祉作为交叉原则进行分析,性别平等和环境完整性。这场大流行病使女权运动一直在说的话浮出水面,即人们的福祉和他们居住的地球取决于一个复杂的网络,超出了有限的身体健康概念。当前的资本主义制度总是在生命和利润之间引发紧张关系,这种游戏通过优先考虑商品、货物和资本的流通,损害了所有人的人权。随着世界各地实施的封锁措施,以及随之而来的数百万处于危险环境中的人不可能遵守封锁措施,这种斗争现在更加强烈。女性甚至更多地承担着补贴整个经济的负担。女权运动现在正在社会运动、公共政策、地方和社区抵抗之间和内部的十字路口寻找团结的解决方案,同时拒绝回到一个女性可能不得不补贴更多经济衰退的世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Getting to COP27: Bridging Generational Divide Low Carbon Mobility Transitions and Justice: A Case of Costa Rica Challenges and Potential to Revamp the Normative Framework on the Right to Development. The Structural Power of the State-Finance Nexus: Systemic Delinking for the Right to Development. The Future is Public! The Global Reclaiming and Democratization of Public Ownership Beyond the Market.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1