GLP-1RA and SGLT2i: Cardiovascular Impact on Diabetic Patients.

IF 1.5 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Current Hypertension Reviews Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1573402116999201124123549
Aschner Pablo, Blanc Evelyn, Folino Claudia, Morosán A Yanina
{"title":"GLP-1RA and SGLT2i: Cardiovascular Impact on Diabetic Patients.","authors":"Aschner Pablo,&nbsp;Blanc Evelyn,&nbsp;Folino Claudia,&nbsp;Morosán A Yanina","doi":"10.2174/1573402116999201124123549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes is a chronic disease with high complexity that demands strategic medical care with a multifactorial risk-reduction approach. Over the past decade, the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has entirely changed. One of the paradigm changes has been the arrival of new drugs that reduce cardiovascular risk beyond the reduction of A1C.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) are two groups of antidiabetics drugs, which have demonstrated superiority compared to placebo for major cardiovascular events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We update and discuss their impact on MACE expressed as relative risk (HR hazard ratio) and as the number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid one cardiovascular event in 5 years. We include the publications of the last 10 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Empagliflozin, Canagliflozin and Dapagliflozin present an HR for MACE of 0.86, 0.86, 0.86 and an NNT of 38, 44, and 33, respectively (Dapagliflozin in secondary prevention). Regarding HHF (Hospitalization for Heart Failure), the HR was 0.65, 0.67, 0.73 and NNT was 44, 62, and 98, respectively. Lixisenatide, Exenatide, Liragutide, Semaglutide, Albiglutide and Dulaglutide presented for MACE an HR of 1.02, 0.91, 0.87, 0.74, 0.78, 0.88, respectively. There was no increase in the risk of HHF, but there was no benefit either.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cardiovascular benefits of the GLP-1RA and the SGLT2i are clinically significant. A number needed to treat under 50 is required to avoid one MACE in five years. These benefits have led to important changes in the Clinical Practice Guidelines and in the care of our patients with T2DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":45941,"journal":{"name":"Current Hypertension Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Hypertension Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573402116999201124123549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Diabetes is a chronic disease with high complexity that demands strategic medical care with a multifactorial risk-reduction approach. Over the past decade, the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has entirely changed. One of the paradigm changes has been the arrival of new drugs that reduce cardiovascular risk beyond the reduction of A1C.

Objective: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) are two groups of antidiabetics drugs, which have demonstrated superiority compared to placebo for major cardiovascular events (MACE).

Methods: We update and discuss their impact on MACE expressed as relative risk (HR hazard ratio) and as the number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid one cardiovascular event in 5 years. We include the publications of the last 10 years.

Results: Empagliflozin, Canagliflozin and Dapagliflozin present an HR for MACE of 0.86, 0.86, 0.86 and an NNT of 38, 44, and 33, respectively (Dapagliflozin in secondary prevention). Regarding HHF (Hospitalization for Heart Failure), the HR was 0.65, 0.67, 0.73 and NNT was 44, 62, and 98, respectively. Lixisenatide, Exenatide, Liragutide, Semaglutide, Albiglutide and Dulaglutide presented for MACE an HR of 1.02, 0.91, 0.87, 0.74, 0.78, 0.88, respectively. There was no increase in the risk of HHF, but there was no benefit either.

Conclusion: Cardiovascular benefits of the GLP-1RA and the SGLT2i are clinically significant. A number needed to treat under 50 is required to avoid one MACE in five years. These benefits have led to important changes in the Clinical Practice Guidelines and in the care of our patients with T2DM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GLP-1RA和SGLT2i:对糖尿病患者心血管的影响。
背景:糖尿病是一种高度复杂的慢性疾病,需要通过多因素降低风险的方法进行战略性医疗护理。在过去的十年中,2型糖尿病(T2DM)的治疗已经完全改变。范式变化之一是,除了降低糖化血红蛋白外,降低心血管风险的新药已经问世。目的:钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2 (SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)是两组降糖药物,在治疗主要心血管事件(MACE)方面表现出与安慰剂相比的优势。方法:我们更新并讨论了它们对MACE的影响,以相对风险(HR危险比)和5年内避免一次心血管事件所需治疗的数量(NNT)来表示。我们收录了最近10年的出版物。结果:恩格列净、卡格列净和达格列净的MACE HR分别为0.86、0.86、0.86,NNT分别为38、44、33(达格列净用于二级预防)。HHF(因心力衰竭住院)的HR分别为0.65、0.67、0.73,NNT分别为44、62、98。利昔那肽、艾塞那肽、利拉古肽、西马鲁肽、阿比鲁肽和杜拉鲁肽的MACE风险比分别为1.02、0.91、0.87、0.74、0.78、0.88。患HHF的风险没有增加,但也没有好处。结论:GLP-1RA和SGLT2i的心血管益处具有临床意义。治疗年龄在50岁以下的患者需要达到5年内避免一次MACE的数量。这些益处导致了临床实践指南和2型糖尿病患者护理方面的重大变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Hypertension Reviews
Current Hypertension Reviews PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Current Hypertension Reviews publishes frontier reviews/ mini-reviews, original research articles and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on hypertension and its related areas e.g. nephrology, clinical care, and therapy. The journal’s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers in the field of hypertension.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Challenges of Recruiting Older People for a Randomised Trial Assessing the Feasibility of Treating White Coat Hypertension in the UK General Practices: A Mixed-methods study. The New Editor-In-Chief Note. Treatment of Hypertension in Children. Screening for Hypertension in Adults of a Northern Delta Province in Vietnam. Highlights from the New European Society of Hypertension Guidelines Document.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1