Development and Validation of a Resilience Questionnaire for Patients During Stroke Rehabilitation in China.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Rehabilitation Nursing Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000295
Lian-Huan Cai, Qi Zhang, Shu-Qin Pang, Hui Chen, Ming Li
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Resilience Questionnaire for Patients During Stroke Rehabilitation in China.","authors":"Lian-Huan Cai,&nbsp;Qi Zhang,&nbsp;Shu-Qin Pang,&nbsp;Hui Chen,&nbsp;Ming Li","doi":"10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to develop a comprehensive questionnaire for assessing resilience in patients with stroke during rehabilitation and examine the questionnaire's reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A four-phased design was used to develop and validate the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The preliminary items of the Resilience Questionnaire for Stroke Rehabilitation (RQSR) were generated through a literature review and a qualitative study. Twenty experts were consulted for content validation and modification of the questionnaire. A pilot study was conducted with 55 patients with stroke. A total of 510 participants from seven rehabilitation centers or hospitals were subsequently recruited to examine the psychometric properties of the RQSR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RQSR consists of 35 items within three dimensions. Dimensions include effective rehabilitation training, accessible support system, and appropriate self-regulation. The content validity index of the total questionnaire was .9335. Seven factors were derived through factor analysis, and cumulative contribution rate of variance was 65.455%. Cronbach's alpha of the total questionnaire was .957, with each dimension ranging from .731 to .918, demonstrating high levels of reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RQSR has sound reliability and validity and can be used as an appropriate tool for assessing resilience for patients with stroke during rehabilitation to facilitate effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49631,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to develop a comprehensive questionnaire for assessing resilience in patients with stroke during rehabilitation and examine the questionnaire's reliability and validity.

Design: A four-phased design was used to develop and validate the questionnaire.

Methods: The preliminary items of the Resilience Questionnaire for Stroke Rehabilitation (RQSR) were generated through a literature review and a qualitative study. Twenty experts were consulted for content validation and modification of the questionnaire. A pilot study was conducted with 55 patients with stroke. A total of 510 participants from seven rehabilitation centers or hospitals were subsequently recruited to examine the psychometric properties of the RQSR.

Results: The RQSR consists of 35 items within three dimensions. Dimensions include effective rehabilitation training, accessible support system, and appropriate self-regulation. The content validity index of the total questionnaire was .9335. Seven factors were derived through factor analysis, and cumulative contribution rate of variance was 65.455%. Cronbach's alpha of the total questionnaire was .957, with each dimension ranging from .731 to .918, demonstrating high levels of reliability.

Conclusion: The RQSR has sound reliability and validity and can be used as an appropriate tool for assessing resilience for patients with stroke during rehabilitation to facilitate effective interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国脑卒中康复患者心理弹性问卷的编制与验证。
目的:设计一份评估脑卒中患者康复过程中心理弹性的综合问卷,并对问卷的信效度进行检验。设计:采用四阶段设计来开发和验证问卷。方法:通过文献查阅和质性研究,编制脑卒中康复弹性问卷(RQSR)的初步项目。咨询了20位专家对问卷进行内容验证和修改。对55名中风患者进行了一项初步研究。随后,共有510名来自7个康复中心或医院的参与者被招募来检查RQSR的心理测量特性。结果:RQSR在三个维度中包含35个条目。维度包括有效的康复训练、可获得的支持系统和适当的自我调节。整个问卷的内容效度指数为。9335。通过因子分析导出7个因子,累积方差贡献率为65.455%。整个问卷的Cronbach's alpha值为0.957,各维度的取值范围为0.731 ~ 0.918,信度较高。结论:RQSR具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评估脑卒中患者康复过程中恢复力的合适工具,为有效干预提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitation Nursing
Rehabilitation Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Nursing is a refereed, award-winning publication and is the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses. Its purpose is to provide rehabilitation professionals with high-quality articles with a primary focus on rehabilitation nursing. Topics range from administration and research to education and clinical topics, and nursing perspectives, with continuing education opportunities in every issue. Articles range from administration and research to education and clinical topics; nursing perspectives, resource reviews, and product information; and continuing education opportunities in every issue.
期刊最新文献
Implementing Remote Patient Monitoring of Physical Activity in Clinical Practice. The Role of Nursing Staff Regarding Goal Setting and Achieving in Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Focus Group Study. The Effect of Motivational Interview-Based Counseling in Individuals With Amputation: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Turkey. The Value of Connectedness. Efficacy of Rapid Rehabilitation Nursing in Postoperative Care in China: A Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1