{"title":"Comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time PCR assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis.","authors":"Konstantin Tanida, Andreas Hahn, Hagen Frickmann","doi":"10.1556/1886.2020.00030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was a comparative evaluation of in-house real-time PCR and commercial real-time PCR (Fast Track Diagnostics (FTD), ampliCube/Mikrogen) targeting enteropathogenic bacteria from stool in preparation of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both 241 stool samples from patients and 100 samples from German laboratory control schemes (\"Ringversuche\") were used to comparatively assess in-house real-time PCR, the FTD bacterial gastroenteritis kit, and the ampliCube gastrointestinal bacterial panels 1&2 either with the in-house PCRs as gold standard and as a test comparison without gold standard applying latent class analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, intra- and inter-assay variation and Cohen's kappa were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison with the gold standard, sensitivity was 75-100% for strongly positive samples, 20-100% for weakly positive samples, and specificity ranged from 96 to 100%. Latent class analysis suggested that sensitivity ranges from 81.2 to 100% and specificity from 58.5 to 100%. Cohen's kappa varied between moderate and nearly perfect agreement, intra- and inter-assay variation was 1-3 to 1-4 Ct values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acceptable agreement and performance characteristics suggested replaceability of the in-house PCR assays by the commercial approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":11929,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology","volume":"10 4","pages":"210-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/4f/eujmi-10-210.PMC7753976.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1886.2020.00030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was a comparative evaluation of in-house real-time PCR and commercial real-time PCR (Fast Track Diagnostics (FTD), ampliCube/Mikrogen) targeting enteropathogenic bacteria from stool in preparation of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices.
Methods: Both 241 stool samples from patients and 100 samples from German laboratory control schemes ("Ringversuche") were used to comparatively assess in-house real-time PCR, the FTD bacterial gastroenteritis kit, and the ampliCube gastrointestinal bacterial panels 1&2 either with the in-house PCRs as gold standard and as a test comparison without gold standard applying latent class analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, intra- and inter-assay variation and Cohen's kappa were assessed.
Results: In comparison with the gold standard, sensitivity was 75-100% for strongly positive samples, 20-100% for weakly positive samples, and specificity ranged from 96 to 100%. Latent class analysis suggested that sensitivity ranges from 81.2 to 100% and specificity from 58.5 to 100%. Cohen's kappa varied between moderate and nearly perfect agreement, intra- and inter-assay variation was 1-3 to 1-4 Ct values.
Conclusion: Acceptable agreement and performance characteristics suggested replaceability of the in-house PCR assays by the commercial approaches.