Sustainability of residential environmental interventions and health outcomes in the elderly.

David A Turcotte, Susan Woskie, Rebecca Gore, Emily Chaves, Kelechi L Adejumo, Kim-Judy You
{"title":"Sustainability of residential environmental interventions and health outcomes in the elderly.","authors":"David A Turcotte,&nbsp;Susan Woskie,&nbsp;Rebecca Gore,&nbsp;Emily Chaves,&nbsp;Kelechi L Adejumo,&nbsp;Kim-Judy You","doi":"10.1186/s40733-020-00066-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research has documented that housing conditions can negatively impact the health of residents. Asthma has many known indoor environmental triggers including dust, pests, smoke and mold, as evidenced by the 25 million people in the U.S. population who have asthma. The paper describes a follow-up study involving elder adults with asthma who participated in a multifaceted home educational and environmental intervention shown to produce significant health benefits. On average the time between the end of the prior intervention study and the follow-up was 2.3 years. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether improvements in environmental conditions and health outcomes resulting from the original Older Adult Study (OAS, multifaceted educational and environmental interventions) would be maintained or decline over time for these low income seniors with asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Health assessment included data on respiratory health outcomes included the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Asthma Control Test from the original Older Adult Study (OAS) and this follow-up Older Adult Study (OAFS) along with health care utilization data. Environmental assessments included evaluation of asthma trigger activities (ATAs) and exposures before and after the original healthy homes intervention (questionnaire, home survey) and at this follow-up. Assessments were conducted in English, Khmer and Spanish.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At assessment in the Older Adult Follow-up Study (OAFS), the older adults maintained some of the health improvements gained during the OAS when compared to the OAS pre-intervention baseline. However, health outcomes declined from the OAS final assessment to the OAFS (only the SGRQ Impact scores were significantly different).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that further study with a larger population is needed to determine if the significant health outcome improvements from multifaceted home educational and environmental interventions (OAS) could be more strongly maintained by providing additional follow-up \"booster\" interventions to this older adult population with asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":8572,"journal":{"name":"Asthma research and practice","volume":"6 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40733-020-00066-6","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asthma research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40733-020-00066-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Research has documented that housing conditions can negatively impact the health of residents. Asthma has many known indoor environmental triggers including dust, pests, smoke and mold, as evidenced by the 25 million people in the U.S. population who have asthma. The paper describes a follow-up study involving elder adults with asthma who participated in a multifaceted home educational and environmental intervention shown to produce significant health benefits. On average the time between the end of the prior intervention study and the follow-up was 2.3 years. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether improvements in environmental conditions and health outcomes resulting from the original Older Adult Study (OAS, multifaceted educational and environmental interventions) would be maintained or decline over time for these low income seniors with asthma.

Methods: Health assessment included data on respiratory health outcomes included the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Asthma Control Test from the original Older Adult Study (OAS) and this follow-up Older Adult Study (OAFS) along with health care utilization data. Environmental assessments included evaluation of asthma trigger activities (ATAs) and exposures before and after the original healthy homes intervention (questionnaire, home survey) and at this follow-up. Assessments were conducted in English, Khmer and Spanish.

Results: At assessment in the Older Adult Follow-up Study (OAFS), the older adults maintained some of the health improvements gained during the OAS when compared to the OAS pre-intervention baseline. However, health outcomes declined from the OAS final assessment to the OAFS (only the SGRQ Impact scores were significantly different).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that further study with a larger population is needed to determine if the significant health outcome improvements from multifaceted home educational and environmental interventions (OAS) could be more strongly maintained by providing additional follow-up "booster" interventions to this older adult population with asthma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人住宅环境干预措施的可持续性和健康结果。
背景:研究证明,住房条件会对居民的健康产生负面影响。哮喘有许多已知的室内环境诱因,包括灰尘、害虫、烟雾和霉菌,美国2500万哮喘患者就是证据。这篇论文描述了一项随访研究,涉及患有哮喘的老年人,他们参加了多方面的家庭教育和环境干预,显示出显著的健康益处。从先前干预研究结束到随访的平均时间为2.3年。本研究的目的是评估最初的老年人研究(OAS,多面教育和环境干预)对这些低收入哮喘老年人的环境条件和健康结果的改善是否会随着时间的推移而保持或下降。方法:健康评估包括呼吸健康结果的数据,包括来自原始老年人研究(OAS)的圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)和哮喘控制测试,以及本次随访的老年人研究(OAFS)以及医疗保健利用数据。环境评估包括在最初的健康家庭干预(问卷调查、家庭调查)前后和随访期间对哮喘诱发活动(ATAs)和暴露的评估。评估以英文、高棉语和西班牙语进行。结果:在老年人随访研究(OAFS)的评估中,与OAS干预前基线相比,老年人在OAS期间保持了一些健康改善。然而,从OAS最终评估到OAFS,健康结果有所下降(只有SGRQ影响得分显著不同)。结论:这些发现表明,需要在更大的人群中进行进一步的研究,以确定多方面的家庭教育和环境干预(OAS)是否可以通过对老年哮喘患者提供额外的随访“助推器”干预来更有力地维持健康结果的显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Asthma Research and Practice is the official publication of Interasma and publishes cutting edge basic, clinical and translational research in addition to hot topic reviews and debate articles relevant to asthma and related disorders (such as rhinitis, COPD overlapping syndrome, sinusitis). The journal has a specialized section which focusses on pediatric asthma research. Asthma Research and Practice aims to serve as an international platform for the dissemination of research of interest to pulmonologists, allergologists, primary care physicians and family doctors, ENTs and other health care providers interested in asthma, its mechanisms and comorbidities.
期刊最新文献
Psychological distress and associated factors among asthmatic patients in Southern, Ethiopia, 2021. Retrospective assessment of a collaborative digital asthma program for Medicaid-enrolled children in southwest Detroit: reductions in short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) medication use. Nonadherence to antiasthmatic medications and its predictors among asthmatic patients in public hospitals of Bahir Dar City, North West Ethiopia: using ASK-12 tool. The hen and the egg question in atopic dermatitis: allergy or eczema comes first. Medication regimen complexity and its impact on medication adherence and asthma control among patients with asthma in Ethiopian referral hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1