Transdiagnostic group cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety in bipolar disorder-a pilot feasibility and acceptability study.

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pilot and Feasibility Studies Pub Date : 2020-11-07 DOI:10.1186/s40814-020-00719-6
Tania Perich, Philip B Mitchell, Tanya Meade
{"title":"Transdiagnostic group cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety in bipolar disorder-a pilot feasibility and acceptability study.","authors":"Tania Perich,&nbsp;Philip B Mitchell,&nbsp;Tanya Meade","doi":"10.1186/s40814-020-00719-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Anxiety is prominent for many people living with bipolar disorder, yet the benefit of psychological interventions in treating this co-morbidity has been minimally explored and few studies have been conducted in a group format. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a transdiagnostic cognitive behaviour therapy group anxiety programme (CBTA-BD) for people living with bipolar disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited to take part in a 9-week group therapy programme designed to treat anxiety in bipolar disorder using cognitive behaviour therapy. They were assessed by structured interview (SCID-5 RV) to confirm the diagnosis of bipolar disorder and assessed for anxiety disorders. Self-report questionnaires-DASS (depression, anxiety, stress), ASRM (mania), STAI (state and trait anxiety) and Brief QOL.BD (quality of life) pre- and post-treatment were administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen participants enrolled in the programme, with 10 participants (5 male; 5 female) completing the follow-up assessments. Two groups (one during working hours, the other outside working hours) were conducted. The programme appeared acceptable and feasible with a mean of 6.9 (77%) sessions attended, though five (50%) participants completed less than 3 weeks homework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The transdiagnostic cognitive behaviour therapy group anxiety programme (CBTA-BD) proved feasible and acceptable for participants; however, homework compliance was poor. A larger randomised pilot study is needed to assess the benefits of the intervention on symptom measures and address homework adherence, possibly through providing support between sessions or tailoring it more specifically to participant needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40814-020-00719-6","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00719-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: Anxiety is prominent for many people living with bipolar disorder, yet the benefit of psychological interventions in treating this co-morbidity has been minimally explored and few studies have been conducted in a group format. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a transdiagnostic cognitive behaviour therapy group anxiety programme (CBTA-BD) for people living with bipolar disorder.

Methods: Participants were recruited to take part in a 9-week group therapy programme designed to treat anxiety in bipolar disorder using cognitive behaviour therapy. They were assessed by structured interview (SCID-5 RV) to confirm the diagnosis of bipolar disorder and assessed for anxiety disorders. Self-report questionnaires-DASS (depression, anxiety, stress), ASRM (mania), STAI (state and trait anxiety) and Brief QOL.BD (quality of life) pre- and post-treatment were administered.

Results: Fourteen participants enrolled in the programme, with 10 participants (5 male; 5 female) completing the follow-up assessments. Two groups (one during working hours, the other outside working hours) were conducted. The programme appeared acceptable and feasible with a mean of 6.9 (77%) sessions attended, though five (50%) participants completed less than 3 weeks homework.

Conclusion: The transdiagnostic cognitive behaviour therapy group anxiety programme (CBTA-BD) proved feasible and acceptable for participants; however, homework compliance was poor. A larger randomised pilot study is needed to assess the benefits of the intervention on symptom measures and address homework adherence, possibly through providing support between sessions or tailoring it more specifically to participant needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨诊断组认知行为治疗双相情感障碍焦虑症的可行性和可接受性研究。
目的:焦虑对许多双相情感障碍患者来说是突出的,然而心理干预在治疗这种合并症中的益处却很少被探索,而且很少有以群体形式进行的研究。本研究旨在评估跨诊断认知行为治疗群体焦虑方案(CBTA-BD)对双相情感障碍患者的可行性和可接受性。方法:招募参与者参加为期9周的团体治疗计划,旨在使用认知行为疗法治疗双相情感障碍患者的焦虑。他们通过结构化访谈(SCID-5 RV)进行评估,以确认双相情感障碍的诊断,并评估焦虑障碍。自我报告问卷- dass(抑郁,焦虑,压力),ASRM(躁狂),STAI(状态和特质焦虑)和简要生活质量。治疗前后分别进行BD(生活质量)评价。结果:14名参与者入组,其中10名参与者(5名男性;5名女性)完成随访评估。分为两组,一组在工作时间,另一组在工作时间之外。该计划似乎是可接受和可行的,平均参加了6.9(77%)次,尽管有5(50%)参与者完成了不到3周的家庭作业。结论:跨诊断认知行为治疗小组焦虑方案(CBTA-BD)被证明是可行和可接受的;然而,家庭作业依从性很差。需要一个更大的随机试点研究来评估干预对症状测量和解决家庭作业依从性的益处,可能通过在会议之间提供支持或根据参与者的需求更具体地进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
期刊最新文献
A protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of an online cancer bereavement group. Tommy's Clinical Decision Support Tool: an intervention development and feasibility study to inform a future randomised controlled trial. Study protocol: feasibility of a hearing program in primary care for underserved older adults. A single-centre randomised, feasibility study using point-of-care (POC) testing for respiratory viruses to direct oral corticosteroids use in preschool-aged children with acute wheeze: a protocol. The More Than Words® parent-delivered program for autistic children and those with social communication challenges: a single-arm pragmatic feasibility trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1