Evaluation of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Incidence of Surgical Site Infection at Borumeda Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Pub Date : 2020-12-04 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S280442
Getachew Moges, Lielet Belete, Yohannes Mengesha, Solomon Ahmed
{"title":"Evaluation of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Incidence of Surgical Site Infection at Borumeda Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Getachew Moges, Lielet Belete, Yohannes Mengesha, Solomon Ahmed","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S280442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infections are global healthcare problems. Although surgical site infections are preventable, they still cause significant morbidity, high death rates, and financial stress on national budgets and individual patients. Inappropriate uses of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis are increasing and worsening patients' quality of life. This study determined the incidence and risk factors of surgical site infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Institution-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured data abstraction format on patients who were attending at the surgical ward of Borumeda hospital from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2019. The data were collected during July 15-30, 2019. A systematic random sampling technique was employed to select 227 surgical cases. Multivariate logistic regression was computed using the statistical package for social sciences version 23.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of surgical site infections was 46.7%. Prophylaxis was administered to 188 (82.8%) surgical cases. Prophylaxis was recommended for 151 (66.5%). Out of these, only 143 (94.7%) received prophylaxis. One hundred seventy-four (78.4%) of the procedures had appropriate indication. The compliance of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis use was 13.7%. The predictors of surgical site infections were receiving prophylaxis more than 24 h after surgery (AOR=3.53, 95% CI: 1.22-10.17), clean-contaminated wounds (AOR=4.54, 95% CI: 1.33-15.53), surgical procedure of thyroidectomy (AOR=5.2, 95% CI: 0.9-21.4), appendectomy (AOR = 29, 95% CI: 6.2-141.7), cholecystectomy (AOR = 21, 95% CI: 3.5 -126.7), hernia (AOR= 8.8, 95% CI: 1.2-62.2), skin and deep tissue (AOR = 125, 95% CI: 7.8-196.7), and orthopedic (AOR=57, 95% CI: 1.6-209.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was high inconsistency between surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice and international surgical site infections prevention guideline. Wrong selection of antimicrobial agents was the most noncompliant to the guidelines. The incidence of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was high and requires due attention. The duration of postoperative prophylaxis should be kept to less than 24 h.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b3/b6/dhps-12-257.PMC7723029.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S280442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections are global healthcare problems. Although surgical site infections are preventable, they still cause significant morbidity, high death rates, and financial stress on national budgets and individual patients. Inappropriate uses of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis are increasing and worsening patients' quality of life. This study determined the incidence and risk factors of surgical site infections.

Methods: Institution-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured data abstraction format on patients who were attending at the surgical ward of Borumeda hospital from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2019. The data were collected during July 15-30, 2019. A systematic random sampling technique was employed to select 227 surgical cases. Multivariate logistic regression was computed using the statistical package for social sciences version 23.

Results: The incidence of surgical site infections was 46.7%. Prophylaxis was administered to 188 (82.8%) surgical cases. Prophylaxis was recommended for 151 (66.5%). Out of these, only 143 (94.7%) received prophylaxis. One hundred seventy-four (78.4%) of the procedures had appropriate indication. The compliance of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis use was 13.7%. The predictors of surgical site infections were receiving prophylaxis more than 24 h after surgery (AOR=3.53, 95% CI: 1.22-10.17), clean-contaminated wounds (AOR=4.54, 95% CI: 1.33-15.53), surgical procedure of thyroidectomy (AOR=5.2, 95% CI: 0.9-21.4), appendectomy (AOR = 29, 95% CI: 6.2-141.7), cholecystectomy (AOR = 21, 95% CI: 3.5 -126.7), hernia (AOR= 8.8, 95% CI: 1.2-62.2), skin and deep tissue (AOR = 125, 95% CI: 7.8-196.7), and orthopedic (AOR=57, 95% CI: 1.6-209.5).

Conclusion: There was high inconsistency between surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice and international surgical site infections prevention guideline. Wrong selection of antimicrobial agents was the most noncompliant to the guidelines. The incidence of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was high and requires due attention. The duration of postoperative prophylaxis should be kept to less than 24 h.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚东北部 Borumeda 医院对手术抗菌药预防措施和手术部位感染发生率的评估:回顾性横断面研究。
背景:手术部位感染是全球性的医疗保健问题。尽管手术部位感染是可以预防的,但它仍然会导致严重的发病率、高死亡率,并对国家预算和患者个人造成经济压力。手术抗菌药预防性使用不当的情况正在增加,并恶化了患者的生活质量。本研究确定了手术部位感染的发生率和风险因素:采用结构化数据摘要格式,对2017年4月1日至2019年3月31日期间在博罗梅达医院外科病房就诊的患者进行了基于机构的回顾性横断面研究。数据收集时间为 2019 年 7 月 15 日至 30 日。采用系统随机抽样技术选取了 227 例手术病例。使用社会科学统计软件包 23 版计算多变量逻辑回归:手术部位感染发生率为 46.7%。188例(82.8%)手术病例采取了预防措施。建议对 151 例(66.5%)采取预防措施。其中只有 143 例(94.7%)接受了预防性治疗。174例(78.4%)手术有适当的适应症。手术抗菌药物预防的依从性为 13.7%。手术部位感染的预测因素包括术后 24 小时以上接受预防(AOR=3.53,95% CI:1.22-10.17)、伤口清洁污染(AOR=4.54,95% CI:1.33-15.53)、甲状腺切除术(AOR=5.2,95% CI:0.结论:甲状腺切除术(AOR=5.2,95% CI:0.9-21.4)、阑尾切除术(AOR=29,95% CI:6.2-141.7)、胆囊切除术(AOR=21,95% CI:3.5-126.7)、疝气(AOR=8.8,95% CI:1.2-62.2)、皮肤和深层组织(AOR=125,95% CI:7.8-196.7)以及骨科(AOR=57,95% CI:1.6-209.5)的手术过程之间存在高度不一致性:结论:外科抗菌药物预防实践与国际手术部位感染预防指南之间存在高度不一致。抗菌药物的错误选择是最不符合指南要求的。手术抗菌预防的发生率很高,需要引起足够重视。术后预防用药时间应控制在 24 小时以内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Heart Failure Patient with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Single Center Retrospective Study in Saudi Arabia. Adverse Events Following Immunization with Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2, and the Experience and Challenges of Reporting in Sierra Leone [Response to Letter]. Baloxavir Resistance Markers in Influenza A and B Viruses in the Americas. Adverse Events Following Immunization with Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2, and the Experience and Challenges of Reporting in Sierra Leone [Letter]. Adverse Drug Reactions Related with Antibiotic Medicines in Malawi: A Retrospective Analysis of Prevalence and Associated Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1