Sticks or Carrots? How an Easy-to-Implement Incentive Plan Improved Our Performance on the In-training Exam.

Jacob G Fowler, David P VanEenenaam, Kathleen N Johnson, Justin R Traunero, John E Reynolds
{"title":"Sticks or Carrots? How an Easy-to-Implement Incentive Plan Improved Our Performance on the In-training Exam.","authors":"Jacob G Fowler,&nbsp;David P VanEenenaam,&nbsp;Kathleen N Johnson,&nbsp;Justin R Traunero,&nbsp;John E Reynolds","doi":"10.46374/volxxii-issue3-Reynolds","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-training examinations (ITEs) are commonly used by residency programs to measure competency in their respective fields. It has been demonstrated that success on the ITE is correlated to First Time Pass Rate (FTPR) on the boards. Therefore, it is important to motivate residents to perform well on these exams. Previous studies indicate positive incentivization may contribute to improvement on examinations. The objective of our study was to determine whether introduction of a positive incentive could improve resident performance on the ITE and/or FTPR on the advanced certifying exam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A positive incentive was introduced in 2017 (certificate of commendation, curriculum vitae honor, public recognition, and $500 in their books/travel allowance) to residents who achieved the target score on the ITE (80th percentile). A survey was then provided to these residents to determine which incentives contributed most to their motivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before the incentivization, 21 (15.1%) of the previous 149 senior residents reached the target score on the annual ITE. After incentivization, this improved to 28 (30.9%) of 81 (<i>P</i> = .0056). The FTPR on the advanced certifying exam was 90% before incentivization and 97.6% after (<i>P</i> = .14). The survey found that the primary motivators were extra funding, honor on their curriculum vitae, and public recognition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that our residents had significant improvements on the annual ITE after the introduction of positive incentives. This incentivization may be easily implemented by program directors in their respective medical residencies to increase examination performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"22 3","pages":"E647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7664600/pdf/i2333-0406-22-3-reynolds.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxii-issue3-Reynolds","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: In-training examinations (ITEs) are commonly used by residency programs to measure competency in their respective fields. It has been demonstrated that success on the ITE is correlated to First Time Pass Rate (FTPR) on the boards. Therefore, it is important to motivate residents to perform well on these exams. Previous studies indicate positive incentivization may contribute to improvement on examinations. The objective of our study was to determine whether introduction of a positive incentive could improve resident performance on the ITE and/or FTPR on the advanced certifying exam.

Methods: A positive incentive was introduced in 2017 (certificate of commendation, curriculum vitae honor, public recognition, and $500 in their books/travel allowance) to residents who achieved the target score on the ITE (80th percentile). A survey was then provided to these residents to determine which incentives contributed most to their motivation.

Results: Before the incentivization, 21 (15.1%) of the previous 149 senior residents reached the target score on the annual ITE. After incentivization, this improved to 28 (30.9%) of 81 (P = .0056). The FTPR on the advanced certifying exam was 90% before incentivization and 97.6% after (P = .14). The survey found that the primary motivators were extra funding, honor on their curriculum vitae, and public recognition.

Conclusions: We found that our residents had significant improvements on the annual ITE after the introduction of positive incentives. This incentivization may be easily implemented by program directors in their respective medical residencies to increase examination performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大棒还是胡萝卜?一个易于实施的激励计划如何提高我们在培训考试中的表现。
背景:实习考试(ITEs)通常被住院医师项目用来衡量他们各自领域的能力。已经证明,在ITE上的成功与董事会的首次通过率(FTPR)相关。因此,激励住院医生在这些考试中表现良好是很重要的。先前的研究表明,积极的激励可能有助于提高考试成绩。我们研究的目的是确定引入积极的激励措施是否可以提高住院医师在高级认证考试中的表现。方法:2017年对达到目标分数(第80百分位)的居民实施了积极的激励措施(表彰证书、简历荣誉、公众认可和500美元的书籍/旅行津贴)。然后向这些居民提供一项调查,以确定哪些激励措施对他们的动机贡献最大。结果:在激励前,149名老年居民中有21人(15.1%)达到了年度ITE目标得分。在激励之后,这一比例提高到28 (30.9%)/ 81 (P = 0.0056)。激励前高级认证考试的FTPR为90%,激励后为97.6% (P = .14)。调查发现,主要的激励因素是额外的资助、简历上的荣誉以及公众的认可。结论:我们发现,在引入积极的激励措施后,我国居民的年度ITE有了显著的改善。这种激励可以很容易地由项目主管在各自的医疗住院医师中实施,以提高考试成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographical Distribution of Newly Accredited Anesthesiology Training Programs in Relation to Health Professional Shortage Areas and Medically Underserved Populations. Identification of Candidate Characteristics that Predicted a Successful Anesthesiology Residency Program Match in 2024: An Anonymous, Prospective Survey. The Role of Ombuds in Graduate Medical Education: Fostering Wellness and Psychological Safety. Assessment and Recommendations for the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Fellowship Websites. Development of a Prioritized Anesthesiology Residency Critical Care Content Outline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1