Nasal Carriage by Staphylococcus aureus among Healthcare Workers and Students Attending a University Hospital in Southern Brazil: Prevalence, Phenotypic, and Molecular Characteristics.

Q3 Immunology and Microbiology Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2020-12-03 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/3808036
Tiago Danelli, Felipe Crepaldi Duarte, Thilara Alessandra de Oliveira, Raquel Soares da Silva, Daniela Frizon Alfieri, Guilherme Bartolomeu Gonçalves, Caio Ferreira de Oliveira, Eliandro Reis Tavares, Lucy Megumi Yamauchi, Marcia Regina Eches Perugini, Sueli Fumie Yamada-Ogatta
{"title":"Nasal Carriage by <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> among Healthcare Workers and Students Attending a University Hospital in Southern Brazil: Prevalence, Phenotypic, and Molecular Characteristics.","authors":"Tiago Danelli, Felipe Crepaldi Duarte, Thilara Alessandra de Oliveira, Raquel Soares da Silva, Daniela Frizon Alfieri, Guilherme Bartolomeu Gonçalves, Caio Ferreira de Oliveira, Eliandro Reis Tavares, Lucy Megumi Yamauchi, Marcia Regina Eches Perugini, Sueli Fumie Yamada-Ogatta","doi":"10.1155/2020/3808036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> can asymptomatically colonize the human anterior nares and skin, and nasal colonization by this bacterium represents a potential risk for development of invasive infections. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of <i>S. aureus</i> nasal carriage among healthcare workers and students attending a university hospital and to characterize the isolates phenotypically and molecularly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed with 324 volunteers. Cultures from nasal samples were obtained and <i>S. aureus</i> isolates were characterized according to their antimicrobial susceptibility profile and four virulence factors-encoding genes. MRSA isolates were characterized regarding their oxacillin/cefoxitin susceptibility, SCC<i>mec,</i> and REP-PCR types. Potential risks for <i>S. aureus</i> and MRSA carriage were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 324 nasal samples, 42.9% were identified as <i>S. aureus</i>, of which 28.8% were MRSA. <i>S. aureus</i> carriers were significantly higher in males and students (OR = 2.898, 95%CI 1.553-5.410); however, no variables were associated with MRSA carriage. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and the highest rate of resistance was observed for penicillin (90.6%). All isolates harbored the <i>coa</i> gene, and 97.8%, the <i>icaA</i> gene; 15.8% and 6.5% were positive for <i>tst</i> and <i>lukS-PV/lukF-PV</i> genes, respectively. Among MRSA isolates, 45% carried the <i>mecA</i> gene but were phenotypically susceptible to oxacillin/cefoxitin; two harbored the <i>tst</i> and none had <i>lukS-PV/lukF-PV</i> genes. All MRSAs were distributed into six SCC<i>mec</i> types and type I (62.5%) was the most frequent. REP-PCR typing identified four main clusters among MRSA isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High prevalence of healthcare workers and students were identified as nasal carriers of <i>S. aureus</i> exhibiting different antimicrobial resistance profiles, including <i>mecA</i>-positive oxacillin-susceptible <i>S. aureus</i> (OS-MRSA) and the presence of virulence-encoding genes. Both cohorts may represent potential sources for the emergence of a successful <i>S. aureus</i> strain highly adapted to the hospital environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":39128,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases","volume":"2020 ","pages":"3808036"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3808036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Staphylococcus aureus can asymptomatically colonize the human anterior nares and skin, and nasal colonization by this bacterium represents a potential risk for development of invasive infections. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage among healthcare workers and students attending a university hospital and to characterize the isolates phenotypically and molecularly.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed with 324 volunteers. Cultures from nasal samples were obtained and S. aureus isolates were characterized according to their antimicrobial susceptibility profile and four virulence factors-encoding genes. MRSA isolates were characterized regarding their oxacillin/cefoxitin susceptibility, SCCmec, and REP-PCR types. Potential risks for S. aureus and MRSA carriage were analyzed.

Results: Of 324 nasal samples, 42.9% were identified as S. aureus, of which 28.8% were MRSA. S. aureus carriers were significantly higher in males and students (OR = 2.898, 95%CI 1.553-5.410); however, no variables were associated with MRSA carriage. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and the highest rate of resistance was observed for penicillin (90.6%). All isolates harbored the coa gene, and 97.8%, the icaA gene; 15.8% and 6.5% were positive for tst and lukS-PV/lukF-PV genes, respectively. Among MRSA isolates, 45% carried the mecA gene but were phenotypically susceptible to oxacillin/cefoxitin; two harbored the tst and none had lukS-PV/lukF-PV genes. All MRSAs were distributed into six SCCmec types and type I (62.5%) was the most frequent. REP-PCR typing identified four main clusters among MRSA isolates.

Conclusion: High prevalence of healthcare workers and students were identified as nasal carriers of S. aureus exhibiting different antimicrobial resistance profiles, including mecA-positive oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus (OS-MRSA) and the presence of virulence-encoding genes. Both cohorts may represent potential sources for the emergence of a successful S. aureus strain highly adapted to the hospital environment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西南部一家大学医院的医护人员和学生鼻腔携带金黄色葡萄球菌的情况:流行率、表型和分子特征。
背景:金黄色葡萄球菌可无症状地在人的前鼻孔和皮肤上定植,这种细菌在鼻腔的定植是发生侵袭性感染的潜在风险。本研究旨在确定在一所大学医院就诊的医护人员和学生中金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔携带的流行率,并从表型和分子角度分析分离菌的特征:方法:对 324 名志愿者进行了横断面研究。方法:对 324 名志愿者进行了横断面研究,从鼻腔样本中获得培养物,并根据金黄色葡萄球菌的抗菌药敏感性谱和四种毒力因子编码基因对分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌进行鉴定。对 MRSA 分离物进行了特征描述,包括其对氧氟沙星/青霉素的敏感性、SCCmec 和 REP-PCR 类型。分析了金黄色葡萄球菌和 MRSA 携带的潜在风险:在 324 份鼻腔样本中,42.9% 被鉴定为金黄色葡萄球菌,其中 28.8% 为 MRSA。男性和学生中金黄色葡萄球菌携带者明显较多(OR = 2.898,95%CI 1.553-5.410);但没有变量与 MRSA 携带相关。所有分离株都对万古霉素敏感,青霉素的耐药率最高(90.6%)。所有分离株都携带 coa 基因,97.8%携带 icaA 基因;分别有 15.8% 和 6.5% 的分离株对 tst 和 lukS-PV/lukF-PV 基因呈阳性反应。在MRSA分离物中,45%携带mecA基因,但对奥沙西林/西福菌素表型敏感;2个携带tst基因,没有一个携带lukS-PV/lukF-PV基因。所有 MRSA 均分为六种 SCCmec 类型,其中以 I 型(62.5%)最为常见。REP-PCR分型确定了MRSA分离物中的四个主要群集:结论:研究发现,医护人员和学生是金黄色葡萄球菌的鼻腔携带者,他们的抗菌药耐药性特征各不相同,其中包括 mecA 阳性的奥沙西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(OS-MRSA)和毒力编码基因的存在。这两类菌群都可能是高度适应医院环境的成功金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的潜在来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Monkeypox: Origin, Transmission, Clinical Manifestations, Prevention, and Therapeutic Options. Evaluation of Emerging Antimicrobials Resistance in Nosocomial Infections Caused by E. coli: The Comparison Results of Observed Cases and Compartmental Model. The Role of Obesity in the Poor Prognosis of COVID-19 Infection: A Review of 192 Patients Ebselen: A Promising Repurposing Drug to Treat Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Microorganisms Meningitis and Bacteremia by Unusual Serotype of Salmonella enterica Strain: A Whole Genome Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1