Quantitative metric for assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treatment response in T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Joy Liau, Srinivasan Vedantham, Hani M Babiker, Travis McGlothin, Diego R Martin
{"title":"Quantitative metric for assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treatment response in T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.","authors":"Joy Liau, Srinivasan Vedantham, Hani M Babiker, Travis McGlothin, Diego R Martin","doi":"10.21037/apc-20-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We theoretically derived a new quantitative metric reflecting the product of T1 signal intensity and contrast media concentration (<i>T1C</i>) using first principles for the signal provided by the gradient echo sequence. This metric can be used with conventional gadolinium contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) exams. We used this metric to test our hypothesis that gadolinium enhancement changes with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) treatment response, and that this metric may differentiate responders from non-responders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Out of 264 initially identified patients, a final total of 35 patients with PDA were included in a retrospective study of responders (n=24) and non-responders (n=11), which used changes in cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and tumor size as reference standards. <i>T1C</i> was computed for the pancreatic mass in the arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases in pre-treatment and post-treatment MRIs. Changes in measurements and correlations with treatment response were assessed by repeated measures analysis of variance and paired <i>t</i>-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the treatment responder group, <i>T1C</i> significantly increased in the arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases (P=7.57e-5, P=3.25e-4, P=1.75e-4). In the non-responder group, <i>T1C</i> did not significantly change in any phase (P>0.58). Post-treatment <i>T1C</i> significantly differed between responders and non-responders (P=0.044) by repeated measures analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>T1C</i> significantly increases in all phases of CE-MRI in responders to treatment, but does not change in non-responders. <i>T1C</i> correlates with treatment response, can be computed from clinical MRI exams, and may be useful as an additional metric to stratify patients undergoing treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8372,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pancreatic Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/c7/nihms-1650141.PMC7755136.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pancreatic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apc-20-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: We theoretically derived a new quantitative metric reflecting the product of T1 signal intensity and contrast media concentration (T1C) using first principles for the signal provided by the gradient echo sequence. This metric can be used with conventional gadolinium contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) exams. We used this metric to test our hypothesis that gadolinium enhancement changes with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) treatment response, and that this metric may differentiate responders from non-responders.
Methods: Out of 264 initially identified patients, a final total of 35 patients with PDA were included in a retrospective study of responders (n=24) and non-responders (n=11), which used changes in cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and tumor size as reference standards. T1C was computed for the pancreatic mass in the arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases in pre-treatment and post-treatment MRIs. Changes in measurements and correlations with treatment response were assessed by repeated measures analysis of variance and paired t-tests.
Results: In the treatment responder group, T1C significantly increased in the arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases (P=7.57e-5, P=3.25e-4, P=1.75e-4). In the non-responder group, T1C did not significantly change in any phase (P>0.58). Post-treatment T1C significantly differed between responders and non-responders (P=0.044) by repeated measures analysis of variance.
Conclusions: T1C significantly increases in all phases of CE-MRI in responders to treatment, but does not change in non-responders. T1C correlates with treatment response, can be computed from clinical MRI exams, and may be useful as an additional metric to stratify patients undergoing treatment.
背景:我们从理论上推导了一个新的定量度量,反映T1信号强度和造影剂浓度(T1C)的乘积,利用第一性原理为梯度回波序列提供的信号。该指标可用于常规钆对比增强磁共振成像(CE-MRI)检查。我们使用这个指标来检验我们的假设,即钆增强随胰腺导管腺癌(PDA)治疗反应的改变,并且这个指标可以区分反应者和无反应者。方法:以肿瘤抗原19-9 (CA 19-9)变化和肿瘤大小作为参考标准,在最初确定的264例患者中,最终共有35例PDA患者被纳入有反应(n=24)和无反应(n=11)的回顾性研究。在治疗前和治疗后的mri中计算动脉、门静脉和延迟期胰腺肿块的T1C。测量值的变化及与治疗反应的相关性通过重复测量方差分析和配对t检验进行评估。结果:治疗反应组动脉期、门静脉期、延迟期T1C均显著升高(P=7.57e-5, P=3.25e-4, P=1.75e-4)。无应答组各期T1C无明显变化(P>0.58)。经重复测量方差分析,治疗后缓解者与无缓解者的T1C差异有统计学意义(P=0.044)。结论:对治疗有反应的患者的T1C在CE-MRI的所有阶段均显著升高,但在无反应的患者中没有变化。T1C与治疗反应相关,可以从临床MRI检查中计算出来,并且可以作为对接受治疗的患者进行分层的额外指标。