Anesthesia Resident Training Experience Minimally Impacts Emergence Time, Making Correlation of Resident Competency With This Operational Metric Difficult.

Luke Fitzgerald Miles, Janeway Granche, Christopher Ryan Hoffman, Michael Stuart Green
{"title":"Anesthesia Resident Training Experience Minimally Impacts Emergence Time, Making Correlation of Resident Competency With This Operational Metric Difficult.","authors":"Luke Fitzgerald Miles,&nbsp;Janeway Granche,&nbsp;Christopher Ryan Hoffman,&nbsp;Michael Stuart Green","doi":"10.46374/volxxii-issue4-hoffman","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anesthesia residents are deemed competent based on subjective and objective metrics. Knowledge acquisition and procedural skill is often difficult to accurately measure. Inspecting tangible metrics of perioperative efficiency may provide a source for reliable evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective case-log database review yielded 3072 surgical cases involving residents over 5 years. Primary variable investigated was the time from surgery completion to exit from operating room. Other variables recorded included day of week, attending anesthesiologist name, attending surgeon name, patient age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) classification, and inpatient versus day surgery status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for procedure duration time, inpatient status, ASA PS, surgeon, and attending anesthesiologist, resident training time had high statistical significance. In the fully adjusted model, 1 year of resident training was associated with a reduction in emergence time by 28 seconds. A 1-hour increase in procedure time was associated with an increase in emergence time of 34 seconds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although a statistically significant correlation between anesthesia resident training time and emergence time was demonstrated, the clinical significance is likely low given the relatively small amount of actual time saved. We caution the value of using perioperative metrics (e.g., emergence time) for evaluating anesthesia resident competency, until such metrics have undergone significant validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"22 4","pages":"E651"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792564/pdf/i2333-0406-22-4-hoffman.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxii-issue4-hoffman","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anesthesia residents are deemed competent based on subjective and objective metrics. Knowledge acquisition and procedural skill is often difficult to accurately measure. Inspecting tangible metrics of perioperative efficiency may provide a source for reliable evaluation.

Methods: Retrospective case-log database review yielded 3072 surgical cases involving residents over 5 years. Primary variable investigated was the time from surgery completion to exit from operating room. Other variables recorded included day of week, attending anesthesiologist name, attending surgeon name, patient age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) classification, and inpatient versus day surgery status.

Results: After controlling for procedure duration time, inpatient status, ASA PS, surgeon, and attending anesthesiologist, resident training time had high statistical significance. In the fully adjusted model, 1 year of resident training was associated with a reduction in emergence time by 28 seconds. A 1-hour increase in procedure time was associated with an increase in emergence time of 34 seconds.

Conclusions: Although a statistically significant correlation between anesthesia resident training time and emergence time was demonstrated, the clinical significance is likely low given the relatively small amount of actual time saved. We caution the value of using perioperative metrics (e.g., emergence time) for evaluating anesthesia resident competency, until such metrics have undergone significant validation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉住院医师的培训经验对急救时间的影响最小,使得住院医师的能力与这一操作指标的相关性变得困难。
简介:麻醉住院医师被认为是有能力的基于主观和客观指标。知识获取和程序技能往往难以准确衡量。检查围手术期效率的有形指标可以提供可靠评估的来源。方法:回顾性病例-日志数据库回顾了3072例住院5年以上的外科病例。调查的主要变量是手术完成到离开手术室的时间。记录的其他变量包括星期几、主治麻醉师姓名、主治外科医生姓名、患者年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会身体状态(ASA PS)分类、住院与日间手术状态。结果:在控制手术时间、住院情况、ASA PS、外科医生、主治麻醉师后,住院医师培训时间具有高度统计学意义。在完全调整的模型中,1年的住院医师培训与急救时间减少28秒相关。手术时间每增加1小时,急诊时间增加34秒。结论:虽然麻醉住院医师培训时间与急诊时间之间存在统计学上的显著相关性,但考虑到实际节省的时间相对较少,临床意义可能较低。我们提醒使用围手术期指标(如急诊时间)来评估麻醉住院医师能力的价值,直到这些指标经过了重要的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographical Distribution of Newly Accredited Anesthesiology Training Programs in Relation to Health Professional Shortage Areas and Medically Underserved Populations. Identification of Candidate Characteristics that Predicted a Successful Anesthesiology Residency Program Match in 2024: An Anonymous, Prospective Survey. The Role of Ombuds in Graduate Medical Education: Fostering Wellness and Psychological Safety. Assessment and Recommendations for the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Fellowship Websites. Development of a Prioritized Anesthesiology Residency Critical Care Content Outline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1