[Indigenous peoples' ways of life and the environment: an ecofeminist authority assertion].

IF 0.3 Q4 ETHICS Cuadernos de Bioetica Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.30444/CB.73
Hugo S Ramírez-García
{"title":"[Indigenous peoples' ways of life and the environment: an ecofeminist authority assertion].","authors":"Hugo S Ramírez-García","doi":"10.30444/CB.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What is the ecological value of the indigenous ways of life? For several years now, there has been a widespread conviction, at the institutional and academic levels, that indigenous or native ways of life are a resource for biodiversity conservation. In contrast to this idea, which leads to strategies with significant implicit dangers, this article defends the thesis that the way of life of the original peoples is a valuable experience that contributes to enhance the necessary wisdom to sustain those actions aimed to genuinely repair the current fracture between humanity and nature. With this in mind, the author explores ecofeminist proposals that offer grounds for acknowledging authority over experiences that have remained at the periphery of the modern mainstream: precisely those that are carried out by indigenous peoples.</p>","PeriodicalId":42510,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What is the ecological value of the indigenous ways of life? For several years now, there has been a widespread conviction, at the institutional and academic levels, that indigenous or native ways of life are a resource for biodiversity conservation. In contrast to this idea, which leads to strategies with significant implicit dangers, this article defends the thesis that the way of life of the original peoples is a valuable experience that contributes to enhance the necessary wisdom to sustain those actions aimed to genuinely repair the current fracture between humanity and nature. With this in mind, the author explores ecofeminist proposals that offer grounds for acknowledging authority over experiences that have remained at the periphery of the modern mainstream: precisely those that are carried out by indigenous peoples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[土著人民的生活方式和环境:生态女权主义权威主张]。
土著生活方式的生态价值是什么?几年来,在机构和学术层面上,人们普遍相信,土著或本土的生活方式是保护生物多样性的一种资源。这一观点导致了具有重大隐性危险的策略,与之相反,本文捍卫的论点是,原始民族的生活方式是一种宝贵的经验,有助于增强必要的智慧,以维持那些旨在真正修复当前人类与自然之间裂痕的行动。考虑到这一点,作者探讨了生态女权主义的建议,这些建议为承认那些仍然处于现代主流边缘的经验的权威提供了依据:正是那些由土著人民执行的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: La revista Cuadernos de Bioética, órgano oficial de la Asociación Española de Bioética y Ética Médica, publica cuatrimestralmente artículos y recensiones bibliográficas sobre todas las áreas de la bioética: fundamentación, ética de la investigación, bioética clínica, biojurídica, etc. Estos proceden de los aceptados en la revisión tutelada por los editores de la revista como de otros que por encargo el comité editorial solicite a sus autores. La edicion de la revista se financia con las aportaciones de los socios de AEBI.
期刊最新文献
[Bioethical issues of Covid-19 in Spain. A systematic review]. [Ethical and legal implications of digital mental health applications]. [Human reason versus arrogance technoscience and the replacement shadow. -Ethical evaluation and social control to regain power on the means and ends from the work of José Sanmartín]. [Response to: ″An egg is not a chicken and an embryo is not a child″]. [The proposal for a regulation on the recognition of parenthood: An attempt to recognize surrogacy in the European Union?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1