Adverse obstetric outcomes in two Brazilian maternity hospitals.

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE Pub Date : 2021-01-05 DOI:10.1108/IJHCQA-02-2020-0026
Alessa Leila Andrade, Zenewton André da Silva Gama, Marise Reis de Freitas, Wilton Rodrigues Medeiros, Kelienny de Meneses Sousa, Edna Marta Mendes da Silva, Tatyana Souza Rosendo
{"title":"Adverse obstetric outcomes in two Brazilian maternity hospitals.","authors":"Alessa Leila Andrade,&nbsp;Zenewton André da Silva Gama,&nbsp;Marise Reis de Freitas,&nbsp;Wilton Rodrigues Medeiros,&nbsp;Kelienny de Meneses Sousa,&nbsp;Edna Marta Mendes da Silva,&nbsp;Tatyana Souza Rosendo","doi":"10.1108/IJHCQA-02-2020-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Obstetric adverse outcomes (AOs) are an important topic and the use of composite measures may favor the understanding of their impact on patient safety. The aim of the present study was to estimate AO frequency and obstetric care quality in low and high-risk maternity hospitals.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A one-year longitudinal follow-up study in two public Brazilian maternity hospitals. The frequency of AOs was measured in 2,880 randomly selected subjects, 1,440 in each institution, consisting of women and their newborn babies. The frequency of 14 AOs was estimated every two weeks for one year, as well as three obstetric care quality indices based on their frequency and severity as follows: the Adverse Outcome Index (AOI), the Weighted Adverse Outcome Score and the Severity Index.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A significant number of mothers and newborns exhibited AOs. The most prevalent maternal AOs were admission to the ICU and postpartum hysterectomy. Regarding newborns, hospitalization for > seven days and neonatal infection were the most common complications. Adverse outcomes were more frequent at the high-risk maternity, however, they were more severe at the low-risk facility. The AOI was stable at the high-risk center but declined after interventions during the follow-up year.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>High AO frequency was identified in both mothers and newborns. The results demonstrate the need for public patient safety policies for low-risk maternity hospitals, where AOs were less frequent but more severe.</p>","PeriodicalId":47455,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-02-2020-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Obstetric adverse outcomes (AOs) are an important topic and the use of composite measures may favor the understanding of their impact on patient safety. The aim of the present study was to estimate AO frequency and obstetric care quality in low and high-risk maternity hospitals.

Design/methodology/approach: A one-year longitudinal follow-up study in two public Brazilian maternity hospitals. The frequency of AOs was measured in 2,880 randomly selected subjects, 1,440 in each institution, consisting of women and their newborn babies. The frequency of 14 AOs was estimated every two weeks for one year, as well as three obstetric care quality indices based on their frequency and severity as follows: the Adverse Outcome Index (AOI), the Weighted Adverse Outcome Score and the Severity Index.

Findings: A significant number of mothers and newborns exhibited AOs. The most prevalent maternal AOs were admission to the ICU and postpartum hysterectomy. Regarding newborns, hospitalization for > seven days and neonatal infection were the most common complications. Adverse outcomes were more frequent at the high-risk maternity, however, they were more severe at the low-risk facility. The AOI was stable at the high-risk center but declined after interventions during the follow-up year.

Originality/value: High AO frequency was identified in both mothers and newborns. The results demonstrate the need for public patient safety policies for low-risk maternity hospitals, where AOs were less frequent but more severe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西两家妇产医院的不良产科结果。
目的:产科不良结局(AOs)是一个重要的话题,使用复合措施可能有助于了解其对患者安全的影响。本研究的目的是估计低风险和高风险妇产医院的AO频率和产科护理质量。设计/方法/方法:在巴西两家公立妇产医院进行为期一年的纵向随访研究。在随机选择的2880名受试者中,每个机构有1440名受试者,包括妇女和她们的新生儿,测量了aoo的频率。在一年的时间里,每两周估计14例不良反应发生的频率,并根据其发生频率和严重程度评估三个产科护理质量指标:不良结果指数(AOI)、加权不良结果评分和严重程度指数。结果:大量的母亲和新生儿表现出AOs。最常见的产妇不良反应是入住ICU和产后子宫切除术。对于新生儿,住院7天以上和新生儿感染是最常见的并发症。不良后果在高风险产妇中更常见,然而,在低风险设施中更严重。AOI在高风险中心保持稳定,但在随访期间干预后有所下降。独创性/价值:在母亲和新生儿中都发现了高频率的AO。结果表明,低风险妇产医院需要制定公共患者安全政策,在这些医院,不良反应较少但更严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: ■Successful quality/continuous improvement projects ■The use of quality tools and models in leadership management development such as the EFQM Excellence Model, Balanced Scorecard, Quality Standards, Managed Care ■Issues relating to process control such as Six Sigma, Leadership, Managing Change and Process Mapping ■Improving patient care through quality related programmes and/or research Articles that use quantitative and qualitative methods are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
A cross-organizational Lean deployment in an Italian regional healthcare system. The mediating effect of patient trust on the relationship between service quality and patient satisfaction. Evaluating patient and medical staff satisfaction from doctor-patient communication. Lean six sigma and stroke in rural hospital - The case of Baruch Padeh Medical Center. Examining the behavioural intention of inpatients in Indian government hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1