Rosa Grazia Bellomo, Teresa Paolucci, Aristide Saggino, Letizia Pezzi, Alessia Bramanti, Vincenzo Cimino, Marco Tommasi, Raoul Saggini
{"title":"The WeReha Project for an Innovative Home-Based Exercise Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Clinical Study.","authors":"Rosa Grazia Bellomo, Teresa Paolucci, Aristide Saggino, Letizia Pezzi, Alessia Bramanti, Vincenzo Cimino, Marco Tommasi, Raoul Saggini","doi":"10.1177/1179573520979866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telerehabilitation (TR) in chronic stroke patients has emerged as a promising modality to deliver rehabilitative treatment-at-home. The primary objective of our methodical clinical study was to determine the efficacy of a novel rehabilitative device in terms of recovery of function in daily activities and patient satisfaction and acceptance of the medical device provided.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 12-week physiotherapy program (balance exercises, upper and lower limb exercises with specific motor tasks using a biofeedback system and exergaming) was administered using the WeReha device. Twenty-five (<i>N</i> = 25) chronic stroke outpatients were enrolled, and the data of 22 patients was analyzed. Clinical data and functional parameters were collected by Berg Balance scale (BBS), Barthel Index (BI), Fugl-Meyer scale (FM), Modified Rankin scale (mRS), and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire at baseline (T0), after treatment (T1), and at the 12-week follow-up (T2). Statistical tests were used to detect significant differences (<i>P</i> < .05), and Cohen's (Co) value was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BI scores improved significantly after treatment (<i>P</i> = .036; Co 0.776, medium), as well as BBS scores (<i>P</i> = .008; Co 1.260, high). The results in FM scale (<i>P</i> = .003) and mRS scores (<i>P</i> = .047) were significant post treatment. Follow-up scores remained stable across all scales, except the BI. The A and C sub-scales of the TAM correlated significantly to only a T2 to T1 difference for BI scores with <i>P</i> = .021 and <i>P</i> = .042.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Currently, the WeReha program is not the conventional therapy for stroke patients, but it could be an integrative telerehabilitative resource for such patients as a conventional exercise program-at-home.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03964662.</p>","PeriodicalId":15218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"1179573520979866"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179573520979866","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179573520979866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Background: Telerehabilitation (TR) in chronic stroke patients has emerged as a promising modality to deliver rehabilitative treatment-at-home. The primary objective of our methodical clinical study was to determine the efficacy of a novel rehabilitative device in terms of recovery of function in daily activities and patient satisfaction and acceptance of the medical device provided.
Methods: A 12-week physiotherapy program (balance exercises, upper and lower limb exercises with specific motor tasks using a biofeedback system and exergaming) was administered using the WeReha device. Twenty-five (N = 25) chronic stroke outpatients were enrolled, and the data of 22 patients was analyzed. Clinical data and functional parameters were collected by Berg Balance scale (BBS), Barthel Index (BI), Fugl-Meyer scale (FM), Modified Rankin scale (mRS), and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire at baseline (T0), after treatment (T1), and at the 12-week follow-up (T2). Statistical tests were used to detect significant differences (P < .05), and Cohen's (Co) value was calculated.
Results: BI scores improved significantly after treatment (P = .036; Co 0.776, medium), as well as BBS scores (P = .008; Co 1.260, high). The results in FM scale (P = .003) and mRS scores (P = .047) were significant post treatment. Follow-up scores remained stable across all scales, except the BI. The A and C sub-scales of the TAM correlated significantly to only a T2 to T1 difference for BI scores with P = .021 and P = .042.
Conclusion: Currently, the WeReha program is not the conventional therapy for stroke patients, but it could be an integrative telerehabilitative resource for such patients as a conventional exercise program-at-home.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03964662.