Comparison of 12-Week Additional Effect Features of Formoterol Co-Inhalation and Tulobuterol Patch on Budesonide Inhalation in Elderly Patients With Asthma.

IF 2.3 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Allergy & Rhinology Pub Date : 2020-12-13 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2152656720980416
Susumu Fukahori, Tetsuya Kawano, Yasushi Obase, Jun Iriki, Tomoko Tsuchida-Yabe, Shinya Tomari, Chizu Fukushima, Hiroto Matsuse, Hiroshi Mukae
{"title":"Comparison of 12-Week Additional Effect Features of Formoterol Co-Inhalation and Tulobuterol Patch on Budesonide Inhalation in Elderly Patients With Asthma.","authors":"Susumu Fukahori,&nbsp;Tetsuya Kawano,&nbsp;Yasushi Obase,&nbsp;Jun Iriki,&nbsp;Tomoko Tsuchida-Yabe,&nbsp;Shinya Tomari,&nbsp;Chizu Fukushima,&nbsp;Hiroto Matsuse,&nbsp;Hiroshi Mukae","doi":"10.1177/2152656720980416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For asthma strategy, to avoid the aggravation of bronchial inflammation and contraction, the long acting beta agonist (LABA) addition on inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) has been recommended.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To know whether there is any clinical difference between the additional efficacies of Formoterol (FOR) and Tulobuterol (TUL) onto Budesonide (BUD) may be useful for the elderly patients' asthma treatment strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen outpatients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma with FEV1.0% < 80% treated by intermediate ICS dosages visited Respiratory Division of Nagasaki University Hospital or Isahaya General Hospital, Japan Community Health care Organization were subjected, and were randomly assigned (9 cases per group) to either the FBC group (BUD/FOR 160/4.5 µg, 2 inhalations twice daily) or BUD + TUL group (BUD 200 mcg: 2 inhalations twice daily + TUL 2 mg daily) and were compared in parallel with 2 arms for 12 weeks prospectively. Peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, impulse oscillometry (IOS), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), Asthma Control Questionnaire, mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ), and occurrence of adverse reactions were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The \"Fres\" of IOS was improved in FBC group (p = 0.03). The \"emotion\" domain of mini-AQLQ was improved in BUD + TUL group (p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By changing the drug formulation, the patch was superior in terms of satisfaction, but it was thought that the inhaled combination was superior in improving the respiratory function itself. It is necessary to pay attention to the characteristics of the patient when selecting treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656720980416","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656720980416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: For asthma strategy, to avoid the aggravation of bronchial inflammation and contraction, the long acting beta agonist (LABA) addition on inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) has been recommended.

Objectives: To know whether there is any clinical difference between the additional efficacies of Formoterol (FOR) and Tulobuterol (TUL) onto Budesonide (BUD) may be useful for the elderly patients' asthma treatment strategy.

Methods: Eighteen outpatients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma with FEV1.0% < 80% treated by intermediate ICS dosages visited Respiratory Division of Nagasaki University Hospital or Isahaya General Hospital, Japan Community Health care Organization were subjected, and were randomly assigned (9 cases per group) to either the FBC group (BUD/FOR 160/4.5 µg, 2 inhalations twice daily) or BUD + TUL group (BUD 200 mcg: 2 inhalations twice daily + TUL 2 mg daily) and were compared in parallel with 2 arms for 12 weeks prospectively. Peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, impulse oscillometry (IOS), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), Asthma Control Questionnaire, mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ), and occurrence of adverse reactions were compared.

Results: The "Fres" of IOS was improved in FBC group (p = 0.03). The "emotion" domain of mini-AQLQ was improved in BUD + TUL group (p = 0.03).

Conclusion: By changing the drug formulation, the patch was superior in terms of satisfaction, but it was thought that the inhaled combination was superior in improving the respiratory function itself. It is necessary to pay attention to the characteristics of the patient when selecting treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福莫特罗联合吸入与妥洛特罗贴片对老年哮喘患者布地奈德吸入12周附加效果的比较。
背景:对于哮喘策略,为了避免支气管炎症和收缩的加重,推荐在吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)上添加长效β受体激动剂(LABA)。目的:了解福莫特罗(Formoterol, FOR)与妥洛特罗(Tulobuterol, TUL)加用布地奈德(budd)的临床疗效是否存在差异,为老年哮喘患者的治疗策略提供参考。方法:18例FEV1.0%的轻中度支气管哮喘门诊患者。结果:FBC组患者IOS“Fres”有所改善(p = 0.03)。BUD + TUL组mini-AQLQ的“情绪”域明显改善(p = 0.03)。结论:通过改变药物配方,贴片在满意度上更胜一筹,但吸入联合用药在改善呼吸功能方面更胜一筹。在选择治疗方法时要注意患者的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Allergy & Rhinology
Allergy & Rhinology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
11
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Incidence of Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients with COVID-19 in a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia. Inverted Papilloma of the Middle Ear: Two New Cases and Systematic Review. Management Strategy of Intracranial Complications of Sinusitis: Our Experience and Review of the Literature. Serial Convalescent Plasma Infusions for the Initial COVID-19 Infections in the Appalachian Region of West Virginia. Long-term Outcomes Following Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency Neurolysis for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1