Prognostic significance of brain invasion in meningiomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Tumor Pathology Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-06 DOI:10.1007/s10014-020-00390-y
Satoshi Nakasu, Yoko Nakasu
{"title":"Prognostic significance of brain invasion in meningiomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Satoshi Nakasu,&nbsp;Yoko Nakasu","doi":"10.1007/s10014-020-00390-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The WHO 2016 classification introduced brain invasion as a standalone criterion for grade II meningioma (GIIM). We systematically reviewed studies published after 2000 and performed a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of the hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) between brain-invasive and noninvasive meningiomas. In five studies that included both benign and higher-grade meningiomas, brain invasion was a significant risk factor for recurrence (HR = 2.45, p = 0.0004). However, in 3 studies comparing \"brain-invasive meningioma with otherwise benign histology (BIOB)\" with grade I meningioma, brain invasion was not a significant predictor of PFS (HR = 1.49, p = 0.23). Among GIIM per the WHO 2000 criteria, brain invasion was a significant predictor of shorter PFS than noninvasive GIIM (HR = 3.40, p = 0.001) but not per the WHO 2016 criteria (HR 1.13, p = 0.54), as the latter includes BIOB. Meta-regression analysis of seven studies of grade II meningioma showed that more frequent BIOB was associated with lower HRs (p < 0.0001). Hence, there is no rationale for brain invasion as a standalone criterion for grade II meningioma, although almost all studies were retrospective and exhibited highly heterogeneous HRs due to differences in brain-tumor interface data availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9226,"journal":{"name":"Brain Tumor Pathology","volume":"38 2","pages":"81-95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10014-020-00390-y","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Tumor Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-020-00390-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The WHO 2016 classification introduced brain invasion as a standalone criterion for grade II meningioma (GIIM). We systematically reviewed studies published after 2000 and performed a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of the hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) between brain-invasive and noninvasive meningiomas. In five studies that included both benign and higher-grade meningiomas, brain invasion was a significant risk factor for recurrence (HR = 2.45, p = 0.0004). However, in 3 studies comparing "brain-invasive meningioma with otherwise benign histology (BIOB)" with grade I meningioma, brain invasion was not a significant predictor of PFS (HR = 1.49, p = 0.23). Among GIIM per the WHO 2000 criteria, brain invasion was a significant predictor of shorter PFS than noninvasive GIIM (HR = 3.40, p = 0.001) but not per the WHO 2016 criteria (HR 1.13, p = 0.54), as the latter includes BIOB. Meta-regression analysis of seven studies of grade II meningioma showed that more frequent BIOB was associated with lower HRs (p < 0.0001). Hence, there is no rationale for brain invasion as a standalone criterion for grade II meningioma, although almost all studies were retrospective and exhibited highly heterogeneous HRs due to differences in brain-tumor interface data availability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑膜瘤脑侵犯的预后意义:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
世卫组织2016年的分类将脑侵犯作为II级脑膜瘤(GIIM)的独立标准。我们系统地回顾了2000年以后发表的研究,并对脑浸润性和非浸润性脑膜瘤的无进展生存(PFS)的风险比(hr)进行了符合prisma标准的荟萃分析。在包括良性和高级别脑膜瘤的5项研究中,脑浸润是复发的重要危险因素(HR = 2.45, p = 0.0004)。然而,在3项比较“具有其他良性组织学的脑浸润性脑膜瘤(BIOB)”与一级脑膜瘤的研究中,脑浸润并不是PFS的显著预测因子(HR = 1.49, p = 0.23)。在WHO 2000标准的GIIM中,脑侵犯是比无创GIIM更短PFS的显著预测因子(HR = 3.40, p = 0.001),但不是WHO 2016标准的预测因子(HR 1.13, p = 0.54),因为后者包括BIOB。7项II级脑膜瘤研究的荟萃回归分析显示,更频繁的BIOB与较低的hr相关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Tumor Pathology
Brain Tumor Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain Tumor Pathology is the official journal of the Japan Society of Brain Tumor Pathology. This international journal documents the latest research and topical debate in all clinical and experimental fields relating to brain tumors, especially brain tumor pathology. The journal has been published since 1983 and has been recognized worldwide as a unique journal of high quality. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts from any country. Membership in the society is not a prerequisite for submission. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, rapid short communications, instructional lectures, review articles, letters to the editor, and topics.Review articles and Topics may be recommended at the annual meeting of the Japan Society of Brain Tumor Pathology. All contributions should be aimed at promoting international scientific collaboration.
期刊最新文献
Primary intracranial sarcoma associated with DICER1 mutant: a case report and preclinical investigation. Tectal glioma: clinical, radiological, and pathological features, and the importance of molecular analysis. Correction: Status of alternative angiogenic pathways in glioblastoma resected under and after bevacizumab treatment. MAPK pathway alterations in polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young: diagnostic considerations. Comparative analyses of immune cells and alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive cells under the immunological microenvironment between with and without dense fibrosis in primary central nervous system lymphoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1