Coffee & Cases: Peer learning in prehospital care.

The clinical teacher Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-07 DOI:10.1111/tct.13326
Jonathan Martin, Joyce Kam, Shadman Aziz
{"title":"Coffee & Cases: Peer learning in prehospital care.","authors":"Jonathan Martin, Joyce Kam, Shadman Aziz","doi":"10.1111/tct.13326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prehospital care programme (PCP) at King's College London Medical School is a student-run programme that arranges for medical and nursing students to shadow clinicians from the London Ambulance Service. The programme aims to increase interprofessional understanding of the roles and expertise within prehospital medicine, as well as observing the patient journey and the prehospital clinical environment. As the programme's organisers, we recognise that whilst creating excellent learning opportunities, there is an additional emotional burden on students, particularly when they are exposed to complex or distressing prehospital patient cases.1 Students in a prehospital environment, compared to hospital settings, may be more likely to sustain ‘moral injury’,1 a term which describes the transgression of moral codes. Therefore, it has been suggested that more debriefing opportunities should be made available to these students.1 Where there is a lack of formal debriefing opportunities, informal near-peer debriefing can potentially play a protective role against moral injury. However, we felt that creating a rigid or overly formal debriefing process could discourage students who would otherwise engage well, as they may shy away for fear of apparent authority.2 In addition, traditional case discussions at nursing and medical schools focus mainly on the clinical aspects of a case, without time being spent looking at either the emotional burden on those involved, or considering the interprofessional relationships during the incident. In recognition of this need to review, learn and reflect, during the academic year of 2019–20 we started ‘Coffee and Cases’ (C&C), a monthly peer-led case review group for PCP students. The aim was to create an informal environment of case discussion, run by nearpeers also on the PCP programme, at differing stages of their medical education. We hoped that C&C would become an opportunity for students to reflect on the more challenging patient presentations and learn from this as shown in Figure 1. The small meeting of up to 15 students took inspiration from a Balint group: a structured forum to discuss the patient's treatment and emotions arising from the experience. One student would share their experience in detail and after clarifying questions, the other members of the group would reflect and discuss the events.3 This reflection focussed on both the emotional understanding of the encounter and learning from the actions of the prehospital clinician.We hoped that C&C would become an opportunity for students to reflect on the more challenging patient presentations One of the main objectives of C&C is to allow the PCP team to check on students’ well-being, especially if they attended to patients in situations which may need further debriefing such as road traffic collisions, mental health crises and deaths. The depth of discussion and willingness of students to contribute indicated C&C to be a safe platform. We noted with interest that what junior medical students found distressing was not what we expected, for instance, complicated patient-family relations and difficult communications with patients and their families.","PeriodicalId":74987,"journal":{"name":"The clinical teacher","volume":"18 4","pages":"370-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/tct.13326","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The clinical teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The prehospital care programme (PCP) at King's College London Medical School is a student-run programme that arranges for medical and nursing students to shadow clinicians from the London Ambulance Service. The programme aims to increase interprofessional understanding of the roles and expertise within prehospital medicine, as well as observing the patient journey and the prehospital clinical environment. As the programme's organisers, we recognise that whilst creating excellent learning opportunities, there is an additional emotional burden on students, particularly when they are exposed to complex or distressing prehospital patient cases.1 Students in a prehospital environment, compared to hospital settings, may be more likely to sustain ‘moral injury’,1 a term which describes the transgression of moral codes. Therefore, it has been suggested that more debriefing opportunities should be made available to these students.1 Where there is a lack of formal debriefing opportunities, informal near-peer debriefing can potentially play a protective role against moral injury. However, we felt that creating a rigid or overly formal debriefing process could discourage students who would otherwise engage well, as they may shy away for fear of apparent authority.2 In addition, traditional case discussions at nursing and medical schools focus mainly on the clinical aspects of a case, without time being spent looking at either the emotional burden on those involved, or considering the interprofessional relationships during the incident. In recognition of this need to review, learn and reflect, during the academic year of 2019–20 we started ‘Coffee and Cases’ (C&C), a monthly peer-led case review group for PCP students. The aim was to create an informal environment of case discussion, run by nearpeers also on the PCP programme, at differing stages of their medical education. We hoped that C&C would become an opportunity for students to reflect on the more challenging patient presentations and learn from this as shown in Figure 1. The small meeting of up to 15 students took inspiration from a Balint group: a structured forum to discuss the patient's treatment and emotions arising from the experience. One student would share their experience in detail and after clarifying questions, the other members of the group would reflect and discuss the events.3 This reflection focussed on both the emotional understanding of the encounter and learning from the actions of the prehospital clinician.We hoped that C&C would become an opportunity for students to reflect on the more challenging patient presentations One of the main objectives of C&C is to allow the PCP team to check on students’ well-being, especially if they attended to patients in situations which may need further debriefing such as road traffic collisions, mental health crises and deaths. The depth of discussion and willingness of students to contribute indicated C&C to be a safe platform. We noted with interest that what junior medical students found distressing was not what we expected, for instance, complicated patient-family relations and difficult communications with patients and their families.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咖啡与案例:院前护理中的同伴学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterising ableism to promote inclusivity within clinical teaching. When technology fails during simulation: Time for reflection? 'Comfort Club': Student-run volunteering on the neonatal intensive care unit. The hidden pandemic: Student perspectives on domestic violence education. Learning and satisfaction in a student-led clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1