Production Time and User Satisfaction of 3-Dimensional Printed Orthoses For Chronic Hand Conditions Compared With Conventional Orthoses: A Prospective Case Series.

Tanja Oud, Yvette Kerkum, Peter de Groot, Harm Gijsbers, Frans Nollet, Merel-Anne Brehm
{"title":"Production Time and User Satisfaction of 3-Dimensional Printed Orthoses For Chronic Hand Conditions Compared With Conventional Orthoses: A Prospective Case Series.","authors":"Tanja Oud,&nbsp;Yvette Kerkum,&nbsp;Peter de Groot,&nbsp;Harm Gijsbers,&nbsp;Frans Nollet,&nbsp;Merel-Anne Brehm","doi":"10.2340/20030711-1000048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hand orthoses are often prescribed for persons with chronic hand and wrist impairments. This study assessed the feasibility, in terms of production time and user satisfaction, of 3-dimensional printed hand orthoses compared with conventional hand orthoses for this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective case series, both a conventional hand orthosis and a 3-dimensional printed hand orthosis were manufactured for 10 participants. Production time (in minutes) of each orthosis was recorded. Each orthosis was worn for one week, after which participants completed a self-designed questionnaire on satisfaction, scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Functionality and orthosis preference were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (standard deviation (SD)) production time for the 3-dimensional printed orthoses, of 112 (11.0) min, was significantly shorter compared with 239 (29.2) min for the conventional orthoses (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 71-182 min, <i>p =</i> 0.001). Satisfaction scores were similar for both orthoses, except for comfort item \"fitting method\", which was rated significantly higher for scanning compared with casting (median [IQR] score: 5 [0.0]; 4 [2.0], <i>p =</i> 0.034). Functionality and orthosis preference were rated similar for both orthoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As the production time was halved, user satisfaction similar, and scanning experienced as slightly more comfortable than casting, 3-dimensional printed hand orthoses seem feasible and potentially beneficial for use in people with chronic hand and wrist impairments.</p>","PeriodicalId":73929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1c/0b/JRMCC-4-1000048.PMC8054741.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/20030711-1000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: Hand orthoses are often prescribed for persons with chronic hand and wrist impairments. This study assessed the feasibility, in terms of production time and user satisfaction, of 3-dimensional printed hand orthoses compared with conventional hand orthoses for this population.

Methods: In this prospective case series, both a conventional hand orthosis and a 3-dimensional printed hand orthosis were manufactured for 10 participants. Production time (in minutes) of each orthosis was recorded. Each orthosis was worn for one week, after which participants completed a self-designed questionnaire on satisfaction, scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Functionality and orthosis preference were also assessed.

Results: The mean (standard deviation (SD)) production time for the 3-dimensional printed orthoses, of 112 (11.0) min, was significantly shorter compared with 239 (29.2) min for the conventional orthoses (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 71-182 min, p = 0.001). Satisfaction scores were similar for both orthoses, except for comfort item "fitting method", which was rated significantly higher for scanning compared with casting (median [IQR] score: 5 [0.0]; 4 [2.0], p = 0.034). Functionality and orthosis preference were rated similar for both orthoses.

Conclusion: As the production time was halved, user satisfaction similar, and scanning experienced as slightly more comfortable than casting, 3-dimensional printed hand orthoses seem feasible and potentially beneficial for use in people with chronic hand and wrist impairments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与传统矫形器相比,3d打印矫形器用于慢性手部疾病的生产时间和用户满意度:前瞻性案例系列。
目的:手部矫形器常用于慢性手部和手腕损伤的患者。本研究评估了3d打印手矫形器与传统手矫形器在生产时间和用户满意度方面的可行性。方法:在这个前瞻性的病例系列中,为10名参与者制造了传统的手部矫形器和三维打印的手部矫形器。记录每个矫形器的制作时间(分钟)。每个矫形器佩戴一周后,参与者完成一份自行设计的满意度问卷,以5分的李克特量表打分。还评估了功能和矫形器偏好。结果:3d打印矫形器的平均(标准差(SD))制作时间为112 (11.0)min,显著短于常规矫形器的239 (29.2)min(95%置信区间(95% CI) 71-182 min, p = 0.001)。两种矫形器的满意度得分相似,除了舒适项目“拟合方法”,扫描的满意度评分明显高于铸造(中位数[IQR]评分:5 [0.0];[2.0], p = 0.034)。两种矫形器的功能和矫形器偏好被评为相似。结论:由于生产时间缩短了一半,用户满意度相似,并且扫描体验比铸造更舒适,3d打印手部矫形器似乎是可行的,并且可能对慢性手部和手腕损伤患者有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EXPLORING THE FEASIBILITY OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA INJECTIONS FOR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCOPATHY: A PILOT STUDY. FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH POST COVID-19 CONDITION AFTER A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM ASSESSMENT: A PILOT STUDY. TIMELY MUNICIPALITY REHABILITATION AFTER HOSPITALISATION REDUCES READMISSION AND EARLY MORTALITY. LONG-TERM REPEATED BOTULINUM TOXIN A TREATMENT OVER 12 YEARS GRADUALLY CHANGES GAIT CHARACTERISTICS: SINGLE-CASE STUDY. INTRATHECAL BACLOFEN FOR NEUROFIBROMATOSIS RELATED SPINAL CORD INJURY WITH SPASTICITY - A CASE REPORT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1