Potential Implementation of Reactive Balance Training within Continuing Care Retirement Communities.

Jessica Aviles, Gwenndolyn C Porter, Paul A Estabrooks, Neil B Alexander, Michael L Madigan
{"title":"Potential Implementation of Reactive Balance Training within Continuing Care Retirement Communities.","authors":"Jessica Aviles,&nbsp;Gwenndolyn C Porter,&nbsp;Paul A Estabrooks,&nbsp;Neil B Alexander,&nbsp;Michael L Madigan","doi":"10.1249/tjx.0000000000000120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing reactive balance training (RBT) in continuing care retirement communities, as a part of typical practice in these facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RBT, a task-specific exercise program, consisted of repeatedly exposing participants to trip-like perturbations on a modified treadmill to improve reactive balance, and subsequently reduce fall risk. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with retirement community residents (RBT participants) and administrators, to assess the organizational context, perceptions of evidence for falls prevention, and facilitation strategies that could improve the likelihood of implementing RBT as a falls-prevention program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contextual factors such as leadership support, culture of change, evaluation capabilities, and receptivity to RBT among administrators and health leaders at the participating retirement communities could facilitate future implementation. The cost associated with RBT (e.g. equipment and personnel), resident recruitment, and accessibility of RBT for many residents were identified as primary barriers related to the intervention. Participants perceived observable health benefits after completing RBT, had increased awareness toward tripping, and greater confidence with respect to mobility. Across interviewees potential barriers for implementation regarding facilitation revolved around the compatibility and customizability for different participant capabilities that would need to be considered before adopting RBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RBT could fill a need in retirement communities and the findings provide areas of context, characteristics of the intervention, and facilitation approaches that could improve uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":75243,"journal":{"name":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","volume":"5 6","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000120","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing reactive balance training (RBT) in continuing care retirement communities, as a part of typical practice in these facilities.

Methods: RBT, a task-specific exercise program, consisted of repeatedly exposing participants to trip-like perturbations on a modified treadmill to improve reactive balance, and subsequently reduce fall risk. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with retirement community residents (RBT participants) and administrators, to assess the organizational context, perceptions of evidence for falls prevention, and facilitation strategies that could improve the likelihood of implementing RBT as a falls-prevention program.

Results: Contextual factors such as leadership support, culture of change, evaluation capabilities, and receptivity to RBT among administrators and health leaders at the participating retirement communities could facilitate future implementation. The cost associated with RBT (e.g. equipment and personnel), resident recruitment, and accessibility of RBT for many residents were identified as primary barriers related to the intervention. Participants perceived observable health benefits after completing RBT, had increased awareness toward tripping, and greater confidence with respect to mobility. Across interviewees potential barriers for implementation regarding facilitation revolved around the compatibility and customizability for different participant capabilities that would need to be considered before adopting RBT.

Conclusion: RBT could fill a need in retirement communities and the findings provide areas of context, characteristics of the intervention, and facilitation approaches that could improve uptake.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在持续照护退休社区实施反应性平衡训练的可能性。
目的:本研究的目的是评估在持续照护退休社区实施反应性平衡训练(RBT)的可行性,作为这些设施典型实践的一部分。方法:RBT是一项特定任务的锻炼计划,包括让参与者在改良的跑步机上反复暴露于类似绊倒的扰动中,以提高反应性平衡,随后降低跌倒风险。对退休社区居民(RBT参与者)和管理人员进行了半结构化访谈,以评估组织背景,对预防跌倒证据的看法,以及可以提高实施RBT作为预防跌倒计划的可能性的促进策略。结果:背景因素如领导支持、变革文化、评估能力和参与退休社区的管理人员和卫生领导对RBT的接受程度可以促进未来的实施。与RBT相关的成本(如设备和人员)、居民招聘和许多居民可获得RBT被确定为与干预相关的主要障碍。参与者在完成RBT后感受到可观察到的健康益处,对绊倒的意识增强,对行动能力的信心增强。在受访者中,实施便利化的潜在障碍围绕着不同参与者能力的兼容性和可定制性,这在采用RBT之前需要考虑。结论:RBT可以满足退休社区的需求,研究结果提供了背景、干预特征和促进方法,可以提高吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lifestyle strategies after intentional weight loss: results from the MAINTAIN-pc randomized trial. Associations of physical and social workplace characteristics with movement behaviors at work. Demographic, Clinical, and Psychosocial Predictors of Exercise Adherence: The STRRIDE Trials. Framework to Classify Physical Activity Intervention Studies for Older Adults Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine: 2022 Paper of the Year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1