Multifaceted strategies to improve blood pressure control in a primary care clinic: A quality improvement project

Cirous Sadeghi, Hassan A. Khan, Gregory Gudleski, Jessica L. Reynolds, Smita Y. Bakhai
{"title":"Multifaceted strategies to improve blood pressure control in a primary care clinic: A quality improvement project","authors":"Cirous Sadeghi,&nbsp;Hassan A. Khan,&nbsp;Gregory Gudleski,&nbsp;Jessica L. Reynolds,&nbsp;Smita Y. Bakhai","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Approximately 80% of patients with hypertension in the Internal Medicine Clinic were uncontrolled (BP &gt; 130/80 mmHg), according to the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) hypertension guidelines, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) was to improve BP control &lt;130/80 from the baseline rates of 20%–30% and &lt;140/90 from the baseline rates of 40%–60% between ages of 18–75 years, within 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used the Plan-Do-Study-Act method. A multidisciplinary QI team identified barriers by fish bone diagram. Barriers included: 1) Physicians' knowledge gap and clinical inertia in optimization of medications, and 2) Patients' nonadherence to medication and appointments. The outcome measures were the percentage of patients with BP &lt; 140/90 and &lt; 130/80. Process measures included: 1) attendance rates of physician and nurses at educational sessions, 2) medication reconciliation completion rates and 3) care guide order rates. Key interventions were: 1) physicians and nurses' education regarding ACC/AHA guidelines, 2) patient education and engagement and 3) enhancement of health information technology. Data analysis was performed using monthly statistical process control charts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We achieved 62.6% (n = 885/1426) for BP &lt; 140/90 and 24.47% (n = 349/1426) for BP &lt; 130/80 within 12 months project period. We sustained and exceeded at 72.64% (n = 945/1301) for BP &lt; 140/90 and 44.58% (n = 580/1301) for BP &lt; 130/80 during the 10 months post-project period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overcoming physician clinical inertia, enhancing patient adherence to appointments and medications, and a high functioning multidisciplinary team were the key drivers for the success.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36839,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100060","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590086220300379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background

Approximately 80% of patients with hypertension in the Internal Medicine Clinic were uncontrolled (BP > 130/80 mmHg), according to the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) hypertension guidelines, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) was to improve BP control <130/80 from the baseline rates of 20%–30% and <140/90 from the baseline rates of 40%–60% between ages of 18–75 years, within 12 months.

Methods

We used the Plan-Do-Study-Act method. A multidisciplinary QI team identified barriers by fish bone diagram. Barriers included: 1) Physicians' knowledge gap and clinical inertia in optimization of medications, and 2) Patients' nonadherence to medication and appointments. The outcome measures were the percentage of patients with BP < 140/90 and < 130/80. Process measures included: 1) attendance rates of physician and nurses at educational sessions, 2) medication reconciliation completion rates and 3) care guide order rates. Key interventions were: 1) physicians and nurses' education regarding ACC/AHA guidelines, 2) patient education and engagement and 3) enhancement of health information technology. Data analysis was performed using monthly statistical process control charts.

Results

We achieved 62.6% (n = 885/1426) for BP < 140/90 and 24.47% (n = 349/1426) for BP < 130/80 within 12 months project period. We sustained and exceeded at 72.64% (n = 945/1301) for BP < 140/90 and 44.58% (n = 580/1301) for BP < 130/80 during the 10 months post-project period.

Conclusions

Overcoming physician clinical inertia, enhancing patient adherence to appointments and medications, and a high functioning multidisciplinary team were the key drivers for the success.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善初级保健诊所血压控制的多方面策略:一个质量改进项目
背景:内科门诊约80%的高血压患者未得到控制(BP >根据2017年美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)高血压指南,130/80 mmHg),导致发病率和死亡率增加。该质量改善(QI)的目的是在12个月内将18-75岁患者的血压控制从基线率(20%-30%)提高至130/80,从基线率(40%-60%)提高至140/90。方法采用计划-行动-研究-行动法。多学科QI团队通过鱼骨图识别障碍。障碍包括:1)医生在药物优化方面的知识差距和临床惯性;2)患者不遵医嘱和预约。结果测量指标为BP <患者的百分比;140/90和<130/80。过程测量包括:1)医生和护士在教育会议上的出勤率,2)药物和解完成率和3)护理指导订单率。主要干预措施是:1)医生和护士关于ACC/AHA指南的教育,2)患者教育和参与,3)加强卫生信息技术。数据分析采用月度统计过程控制图。结果BP <的检出率为62.6% (n = 885/1426);BP和lt分别为140/90和24.47% (n = 349/1426);在12个月内完成130/80的项目。我们维持并超过了72.64% (n = 945/1301)的BP <BP和lt分别为140/90和44.58% (n = 580/1301);在项目后10个月期间达到130/80。结论克服医生的临床惰性,提高患者对预约和用药的依从性,以及一支高效的多学科团队是成功的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension
International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 morbidity and mortality associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers use among 14,129 patients with hypertension from a US integrated healthcare system Reduced global longitudinal strain at rest and inadequate blood pressure response during exercise treadmill testing in male heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients Association of family history with incidence and gestational hypertension outcomes of preeclampsia Critical questions in cardiovascular risk: What nutrition labels should be used on food? Why is salt-sensitivity of blood pressure, a known cardiovascular risk factor, not treated?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1