Age of smile: a cross-cultural replication report of Ganel and Goodale (2018).

IF 1.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-10 DOI:10.1007/s41809-020-00072-3
Naoto Yoshimura, Koichi Morimoto, Mariko Murai, Yusaku Kihara, Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos, Veit Kubik, Yuki Yamada
{"title":"Age of smile: a cross-cultural replication report of Ganel and Goodale (2018).","authors":"Naoto Yoshimura,&nbsp;Koichi Morimoto,&nbsp;Mariko Murai,&nbsp;Yusaku Kihara,&nbsp;Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos,&nbsp;Veit Kubik,&nbsp;Yuki Yamada","doi":"10.1007/s41809-020-00072-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smiling is believed to make people look younger. Ganel and Goodale (Psychon Bull Rev 25(6):612-616, 10.3758/s13423-017-1306-8, 2018) proposed that this belief is a misconception rooted in popular media, based on their findings that people actually perceive smiling faces as older. However, they did not clarify whether this misconception can be generalized across cultures. We tested the cross-cultural validity of Ganel and Goodale's findings by collecting data from Japanese and Swedish participants. Specifically, we aimed to replicate Ganel and Goodale's study using segregated sets of Japanese and Swedish facial stimuli, and including Japanese and Swedish participants in groups asked to estimate the age of either Japanese or Swedish faces (two groups of participants × two groups of stimuli; four groups total). Our multiverse analytical approach consistently showed that the participants evaluated smiling faces as older in direct evaluations, regardless of the facial stimuli culture or their nationality, although they believed that smiling makes people look younger. Further, we hypothesized that the effect of wrinkles around the eyes on the estimation of age would vary with the stimulus culture, based on previous studies. However, we found no differences in age estimates by stimulus culture in the present study. Our results showed that we successfully replicated Ganel and Goodale (2018) in a cross-cultural context. Our study thus clarified that the belief that smiling makes people look younger is a common cultural misconception.</p>","PeriodicalId":55640,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41809-020-00072-3","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-020-00072-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Smiling is believed to make people look younger. Ganel and Goodale (Psychon Bull Rev 25(6):612-616, 10.3758/s13423-017-1306-8, 2018) proposed that this belief is a misconception rooted in popular media, based on their findings that people actually perceive smiling faces as older. However, they did not clarify whether this misconception can be generalized across cultures. We tested the cross-cultural validity of Ganel and Goodale's findings by collecting data from Japanese and Swedish participants. Specifically, we aimed to replicate Ganel and Goodale's study using segregated sets of Japanese and Swedish facial stimuli, and including Japanese and Swedish participants in groups asked to estimate the age of either Japanese or Swedish faces (two groups of participants × two groups of stimuli; four groups total). Our multiverse analytical approach consistently showed that the participants evaluated smiling faces as older in direct evaluations, regardless of the facial stimuli culture or their nationality, although they believed that smiling makes people look younger. Further, we hypothesized that the effect of wrinkles around the eyes on the estimation of age would vary with the stimulus culture, based on previous studies. However, we found no differences in age estimates by stimulus culture in the present study. Our results showed that we successfully replicated Ganel and Goodale (2018) in a cross-cultural context. Our study thus clarified that the belief that smiling makes people look younger is a common cultural misconception.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微笑的时代:Ganel和Goodale(2018)的跨文化复制报告。
微笑被认为能让人看起来更年轻。Ganel和Goodale(心理学报Rev 25(6):612-616, 10.3758/s13423-017-1306- 8,2018)提出,基于他们的研究结果,人们实际上认为微笑的脸更老,这种信念是一种植根于大众媒体的误解。然而,他们并没有澄清这种误解是否可以跨文化推广。我们通过收集日本和瑞典参与者的数据来检验Ganel和Goodale研究结果的跨文化有效性。具体来说,我们的目标是复制Ganel和Goodale的研究,使用分离的日本和瑞典面部刺激集,并将日本和瑞典参与者纳入被要求估计日本或瑞典面部年龄的小组(两组参与者×两组刺激;共四组)。我们的多元宇宙分析方法一致表明,无论面部刺激文化或国籍如何,参与者在直接评估中都认为微笑的脸更老,尽管他们相信微笑会让人看起来更年轻。此外,根据之前的研究,我们假设眼周皱纹对年龄估计的影响会随着刺激文化的不同而变化。然而,在本研究中,我们发现刺激文化对年龄的估计没有差异。我们的研究结果表明,我们在跨文化背景下成功地复制了Ganel和Goodale(2018)的研究结果。因此,我们的研究表明,认为微笑会让人看起来更年轻是一种普遍的文化误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
The effect of bilingualism and multicultural experience on social-cognitive processing: a meta-analytic review Interference of the inclusive language in the creation of the memory trace during the reading comprehension of texts Distributed embodiment of the Persian term dæqi:qæn in forward gestures The effect of linguistic medium on metaphor directionality: written standard Arabic versus oral colloquial Arabic Decoding orthography vs. mastering strategy: an exploratory study finds better opposite-orientation task transfer for monoliterates than for biliterates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1