Long-Term Quality of Life after Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Surgery with Nasoseptal Flap Reconstruction.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal Pub Date : 2021-04-29 DOI:10.5041/RMMJ.10435
Shadi Shinnawi, Ilya Kopaev, Shorook Na'ara, Ayelet Eran, Gil Sviri, Dmitry Ostrovsky, Ziv Gil
{"title":"Long-Term Quality of Life after Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Surgery with Nasoseptal Flap Reconstruction.","authors":"Shadi Shinnawi,&nbsp;Ilya Kopaev,&nbsp;Shorook Na'ara,&nbsp;Ayelet Eran,&nbsp;Gil Sviri,&nbsp;Dmitry Ostrovsky,&nbsp;Ziv Gil","doi":"10.5041/RMMJ.10435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) on the pituitary gland is considered safe and efficacious. The nasoseptal flap (NSF) is sometimes used to prevent or repair postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Few investigators have quantified long-term quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes regarding sinonasal measures after EETS, with or without involvement of the NSF. This study assesses whether the septal flap affects sinonasal QOL outcomes for patients receiving EETS for pituitary adenoma.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent EETS between 2013 and 2018. A total of 62 adults completed the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) at least one year after the surgery. Outcome measures were compared between patients who underwent EETS with and without septal flap reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the entire cohort, there were 14 patients (22.6%) who had septal flap reconstruction and 48 patients (77.4%) who did not. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, and duration between surgery and completion of the questionnaire were similar for both groups. The mean SNOT-22 scores in the no reconstruction (NR) group and the nasoseptal flap reconstruction (NSFR) group were similar (P=0.9). In terms of SNOT-22 subdomains (rhinologic symptoms, extranasal rhinologic symptoms, ear/facial symptoms, psychological dysfunction, and sleep dysfunction), no significant differences were found when comparing the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As compared with no reconstructive involvement, NSF utilization does not affect the QOL and nasal symptoms of patients undergoing EETS.</p>","PeriodicalId":46408,"journal":{"name":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092951/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) on the pituitary gland is considered safe and efficacious. The nasoseptal flap (NSF) is sometimes used to prevent or repair postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Few investigators have quantified long-term quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes regarding sinonasal measures after EETS, with or without involvement of the NSF. This study assesses whether the septal flap affects sinonasal QOL outcomes for patients receiving EETS for pituitary adenoma.

Methods and materials: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent EETS between 2013 and 2018. A total of 62 adults completed the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) at least one year after the surgery. Outcome measures were compared between patients who underwent EETS with and without septal flap reconstruction.

Results: For the entire cohort, there were 14 patients (22.6%) who had septal flap reconstruction and 48 patients (77.4%) who did not. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, and duration between surgery and completion of the questionnaire were similar for both groups. The mean SNOT-22 scores in the no reconstruction (NR) group and the nasoseptal flap reconstruction (NSFR) group were similar (P=0.9). In terms of SNOT-22 subdomains (rhinologic symptoms, extranasal rhinologic symptoms, ear/facial symptoms, psychological dysfunction, and sleep dysfunction), no significant differences were found when comparing the groups.

Conclusion: As compared with no reconstructive involvement, NSF utilization does not affect the QOL and nasal symptoms of patients undergoing EETS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻中隔瓣重建垂体腺瘤内镜手术后的长期生活质量。
内镜下经鼻蝶窦垂体手术(EETS)被认为是安全有效的。鼻中隔皮瓣(NSF)有时用于预防或修复术后脑脊液(CSF)泄漏。很少有研究者量化EETS后鼻窦测量的长期生活质量(QOL)结果,无论是否有NSF的参与。本研究评估鼻中隔皮瓣是否影响垂体腺瘤患者接受EETS治疗的鼻窦生活质量。方法和材料:这是一项对2013年至2018年期间接受EETS治疗的患者的回顾性研究。共有62名成年人在手术后至少一年完成了鼻窦预后测试-22 (SNOT-22)。结果测量比较接受EETS的患者与不接受鼻中隔皮瓣重建的患者。结果:在整个队列中,14例(22.6%)患者进行了鼻中隔瓣重建,48例(77.4%)患者未进行鼻中隔瓣重建。两组患者的人口统计学特征、肿瘤特征、手术结果以及手术和完成问卷之间的持续时间相似。无鼻中隔瓣重建组(NR)和鼻中隔瓣重建组(NSFR)的SNOT-22平均评分相近(P=0.9)。在SNOT-22亚域(鼻症状、鼻外鼻症状、耳/面部症状、心理功能障碍和睡眠功能障碍)方面,组间比较无显著差异。结论:与无重建受术者相比,NSF的使用对EETS患者的生活质量和鼻症状没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Integration of Bite Mark Microbiome Analysis with Forensic DNA Profiling: Advancements, Challenges, and Synergistic Approaches. Interpreting PPV and NPV of Diagnostic Tests with Uncertain Prevalence. Local Flap Reconstructions in Oral Cavity Defects: An Insight from 104 Cases. Navigating the Complexity of Alternating Hemiplegia in Childhood: A Comprehensive Review. Changes in the Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: 1980 to Date.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1