Comparison of self-rating of cognition and depression in patients with major depressive disorder.

IF 9 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Mental Illness Pub Date : 2020-06-27 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1108/MIJ-02-2020-0005
Kishen Berra, Charles Nguyen, Peter Bota
{"title":"Comparison of self-rating of cognition and depression in patients with major depressive disorder.","authors":"Kishen Berra,&nbsp;Charles Nguyen,&nbsp;Peter Bota","doi":"10.1108/MIJ-02-2020-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to discover if there is a correlation between scores on the Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) scores of 43 patients with major depression.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>In total, 43 adult patients with major depression were evaluated during their regularly scheduled outpatient appointment in a mental health clinic.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There was an <i>R<sup>2</sup></i> value of 0.6544 between the patients' scores, a moderate-to-strong correlation which matches other observations that cognitive impairment increases in conjunction with severity of depression. This correlation lends further clinical support to the legitimacy of using the CPFQ as a simpler alternative to traditional neuropsychological testing, with further testing of the correlation between CPFQ and traditional neuropsychological testing results being a worthwhile potential field of study.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction is a frequent comorbidity in patients with depression, but while there is a brief and effective self- assessment for depression, the BDI, in common use, there is no equivalent test for cognitive dysfunction, and physicians are forced to rely on less accessible methods of neuropsychological testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":44029,"journal":{"name":"Mental Illness","volume":"12 2","pages":"31-33"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/MIJ-02-2020-0005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Illness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/MIJ-02-2020-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to discover if there is a correlation between scores on the Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) scores of 43 patients with major depression.

Design/methodology/approach: In total, 43 adult patients with major depression were evaluated during their regularly scheduled outpatient appointment in a mental health clinic.

Findings: There was an R2 value of 0.6544 between the patients' scores, a moderate-to-strong correlation which matches other observations that cognitive impairment increases in conjunction with severity of depression. This correlation lends further clinical support to the legitimacy of using the CPFQ as a simpler alternative to traditional neuropsychological testing, with further testing of the correlation between CPFQ and traditional neuropsychological testing results being a worthwhile potential field of study.

Originality/value: Cognitive dysfunction is a frequent comorbidity in patients with depression, but while there is a brief and effective self- assessment for depression, the BDI, in common use, there is no equivalent test for cognitive dysfunction, and physicians are forced to rely on less accessible methods of neuropsychological testing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重度抑郁症患者认知自评与抑郁的比较。
目的:探讨43例重度抑郁症患者的贝克抑郁量表(BDI)得分与认知与身体功能问卷(CPFQ)得分之间是否存在相关性。设计/方法/方法:共有43名患有重度抑郁症的成年患者在心理健康诊所的定期门诊预约期间接受评估。研究结果:患者得分之间的R2值为0.6544,与其他观察结果相吻合,认知障碍与抑郁症的严重程度相关。这种相关性为使用CPFQ作为传统神经心理测试更简单的替代方法的合法性提供了进一步的临床支持,进一步测试CPFQ和传统神经心理测试结果之间的相关性是一个有价值的潜在研究领域。独创性/价值:认知功能障碍是抑郁症患者常见的合并症,但是,虽然有一种简单有效的抑郁症自我评估,即BDI,在普遍使用中,没有等效的认知功能障碍测试,医生被迫依赖于不易获得的神经心理测试方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mental Illness
Mental Illness PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Factors Associated with Self-Reported Substance Use among Patients with Mental Illness in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study Biopsychosocial Profile of COVID-19 Patients Cared for in Public and Private Health Facilities in Kandahar Province, Afghanistan A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring Mental Health among Patients Suffering from Dengue in Pakistani Tertiary Care Hospitals Physical Activity and Exercise as a Tool to Cure Anxiety and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Stress Is Associated with Quality of Life Reduction among Health Professionals in Vietnam: A Multisite Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1