Video-assisted reflection: improving OSCE feedback.

The clinical teacher Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-03 DOI:10.1111/tct.13354
Oliver Mitchell, Natalia Cotton, Kathleen Leedham-Green, Salem Elias, Brent Bartholomew
{"title":"Video-assisted reflection: improving OSCE feedback.","authors":"Oliver Mitchell,&nbsp;Natalia Cotton,&nbsp;Kathleen Leedham-Green,&nbsp;Salem Elias,&nbsp;Brent Bartholomew","doi":"10.1111/tct.13354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are commonly used to provide feedback to students on their performance in formative examinations. However, students are often unable to act independently on the feedback they receive. This study explored how the use of video-assisted reflection in OSCEs can enhance students' ability to reflect and engage in sustainable feedback.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one students undertaking a mock-final OSCE consented to have one of their examination stations filmed. Participants completed a series of reflective forms immediately after the OSCE, after verbal feedback from an examiner and finally, after watching the video of their own performance. Students were asked to predict their overall grade as well as list areas for improvement. Pearson r correlations examined the relationship between the examiners' grades and the candidates' self-predicted grades. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the length of reflections at each stage. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore students' beliefs on self-efficacy and how the video-assisted reflection altered their ability to act on feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The students' ability to self-assess and gauge their own performance improved significantly after undertaking the video-assisted reflection (p < 0.01). Furthermore, video-assisted reflection significantly increased the length of the student's reflections. In interviews, participants described multiple ways in which the video-assisted reflection improved their confidence and ability to act on feedback, highlighting a clear enhancement in self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Video-assisted reflection of recorded OSCE stations represents an effective approach to increase student self-efficacy and subsequently improve engagement in sustainable feedback practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74987,"journal":{"name":"The clinical teacher","volume":"18 4","pages":"409-416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/tct.13354","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The clinical teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are commonly used to provide feedback to students on their performance in formative examinations. However, students are often unable to act independently on the feedback they receive. This study explored how the use of video-assisted reflection in OSCEs can enhance students' ability to reflect and engage in sustainable feedback.

Methods: Twenty-one students undertaking a mock-final OSCE consented to have one of their examination stations filmed. Participants completed a series of reflective forms immediately after the OSCE, after verbal feedback from an examiner and finally, after watching the video of their own performance. Students were asked to predict their overall grade as well as list areas for improvement. Pearson r correlations examined the relationship between the examiners' grades and the candidates' self-predicted grades. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the length of reflections at each stage. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore students' beliefs on self-efficacy and how the video-assisted reflection altered their ability to act on feedback.

Results: The students' ability to self-assess and gauge their own performance improved significantly after undertaking the video-assisted reflection (p < 0.01). Furthermore, video-assisted reflection significantly increased the length of the student's reflections. In interviews, participants described multiple ways in which the video-assisted reflection improved their confidence and ability to act on feedback, highlighting a clear enhancement in self-efficacy.

Discussion: Video-assisted reflection of recorded OSCE stations represents an effective approach to increase student self-efficacy and subsequently improve engagement in sustainable feedback practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视频辅助反思:改进欧安组织反馈。
背景:目的结构化临床考试(OSCEs)通常用于对学生在形成性考试中的表现进行反馈。然而,学生往往无法根据他们收到的反馈独立行动。本研究探讨了视频辅助反思如何提高学生反思和参与可持续反馈的能力。方法:21名参加模拟决赛的学生同意拍摄他们的一个考点。参与者在欧安组织结束后,在考官的口头反馈之后,最后在观看了自己的表演视频之后,立即完成了一系列反思表格。学生们被要求预测他们的总体成绩,并列出需要改进的地方。皮尔逊相关性检验了考官的分数和考生自我预测的分数之间的关系。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较每个阶段反射的长度。研究人员进行了半结构化访谈,以探讨学生对自我效能感的看法,以及视频辅助反思如何改变他们根据反馈采取行动的能力。结果:在进行视频辅助反思后,学生自我评估和衡量自己表现的能力显著提高(p讨论:视频辅助反思录制的欧安组织站是提高学生自我效能感并随后提高可持续反馈实践参与度的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterising ableism to promote inclusivity within clinical teaching. When technology fails during simulation: Time for reflection? 'Comfort Club': Student-run volunteering on the neonatal intensive care unit. The hidden pandemic: Student perspectives on domestic violence education. Learning and satisfaction in a student-led clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1